Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey every one new owner of a sereis 1.5 r33.

Just had my car on the dyno the other day and my results were not what i expected. From what ive seen of the cars on this site and the type of mods my cars output is somewhat lacking. with 154rwkw @10psi. im thinking theres something other than the obvious wrong. Below is a list of the mods and what need attention.

PFC

Modified factory plenum to face forward

FMIC

exhaust and dump

pod filter

Now i know the coil packs need to replaced so that explains why it cannot boost over 10psi, ive just seen some other power outputs at this level of boost with roughly 180rwkw can the coil packs also effect the power outpout at lower boost levels as well. shouldnt there still be sufficient spark?

Was wondering other peoples thoughts on my situation.

Kind regards

Chris

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/311183-new-owner-of-r33-power-question/
Share on other sites

What do you expect afrs to tell you? They could be spot on but there could be a lack of timing...

How do you know it needs coilpacks?

Does it break down and splutter during the run?

If so how can you expect it to be making power.

Its amazing what healthy fuel and ignition systems can do.

You'll notice coil packs breaking down by a sharp stutter in the power delivery - usually higher in the rev range ~4500-5000rpm. If this isn't occurring I would think the coilpacks are fine.

154rwkw for 10psi is pretty low , you should expect at least 175rwkw - but each dyno is different and depends on values put in. Is the torque & power curve fairly linear/expected shape?

Before getting a retune make sure everything is in good condition. Change fuel filter, spark plugs (typical copper ones) and check for boost leaks.

Pretty sure its the coil packs, if you wind up the boost any more than 10psi it will cough and splutter.

Im thinking it might be timing also, it seems doughy and lifeless below 4500, above 5000rpm it really picks up in response. but that was after the tune. (Im hoping once i go back after the coil packs have been replaced, it will make difference

I knew the coil packs were possibley on there way out before the tune, but it was a new car and i wanted to get it checked over before is started driving it, The person who owned it before me wound the boost controller open all the way, and when i got it, the car was running 1.5bar, so im thinking the turbo may also be damaged being stock and all.

THanks for yourt reponsees so far

My S1 R33 made 155rwkw with chipped ECU, turbo back exhaust, K&N panel filter, and 12psi. I went to another dyno and made 190rwkw without changing a thing... Soooooo many variables that affect a dyno reading. Smoothness of curve is going to tell you more about how it's performing.

I had a 'cough and splutter' problem back with my stock ECU (search 'overboost protection'), but re-gapped the spark plugs to 0.8mm and the problem disappeared (@ 10psi). AM ECU should also solve this problem.

I had a Cat back exhaust, and 12ish psi running through my R34 GTT (remember, its 206kw from factory, up abit on the R33's) and it pulled 161rwkw.

My answer, every dyno is different. Does it feel fast to you? Feel good to drive? If so, focus more on that then a piece of paper.

IMO the one real test for power is the 1/4 mile. Track it, get your trap speed, and then work out whether its down on power from where it should be.

My S1 R33 made 155rwkw with chipped ECU, turbo back exhaust, K&N panel filter, and 12psi. I went to another dyno and made 190rwkw without changing a thing... Soooooo many variables that affect a dyno reading. Smoothness of curve is going to tell you more about how it's performing.

I had a 'cough and splutter' problem back with my stock ECU (search 'overboost protection'), but re-gapped the spark plugs to 0.8mm and the problem disappeared (@ 10psi). AM ECU should also solve this problem.

he is running a PFC, so ecu isn't an issue

looks like you have some sort of issue going on there judging by the dyno graph (depending on a few things). are you running a boost controller or is the 10psi just what it is climbing to on it's own?

to be honest, i would put it down to being one of a few possible things.

1: tired engine

2: crap tune

3: the foward facing plenum (wouldn't be the whole cause, but certainly won't be helping the situation and may be part of the cause of the tired engine as you will get uneven airflow which can result in major leaning out in cylinders 5 and 6 and running rich in 1 and 2. the plenums are designed to have air come in from the side so having it come in from the front is going to give drastically different flow characteristics than what it was designed to have)

I had a Cat back exhaust, and 12ish psi running through my R34 GTT (remember, its 206kw from factory, up abit on the R33's) and it pulled 161rwkw.

My answer, every dyno is different. Does it feel fast to you? Feel good to drive? If so, focus more on that then a piece of paper.

IMO the one real test for power is the 1/4 mile. Track it, get your trap speed, and then work out whether its down on power from where it should be.

you also have to remember that all stock power outputs are measured at the flywheel, so you will never have a stock car make on a dyno what the power is quoted to be. also you were running 12psi through the stock dump/front pipe and cat, which is an area of substantial restriction so you wouldn't be making as much power as a 33 with a turbo back exhaust, and probably not much more power than if you dropped the boost back down to 10psi. also the stock side mount cooler suffers from heat soak pretty quickly. even though it is bigger than a 33 one it is still small.

a basic rule you can use is, the power in kw at the flywheel (so power quoted by the manufacturer) will equal the power in HP at the wheels. so if a car has 200kw at the flywheel, it will have around 200hp at the wheels, or about 150kw at the wheels. it isn't exact but it is pretty close to.

you also have to remember that all stock power outputs are measured at the flywheel, so you will never have a stock car make on a dyno what the power is quoted to be. also you were running 12psi through the stock dump/front pipe and cat, which is an area of substantial restriction so you wouldn't be making as much power as a 33 with a turbo back exhaust, and probably not much more power than if you dropped the boost back down to 10psi. also the stock side mount cooler suffers from heat soak pretty quickly. even though it is bigger than a 33 one it is still small.

a basic rule you can use is, the power in kw at the flywheel (so power quoted by the manufacturer) will equal the power in HP at the wheels. so if a car has 200kw at the flywheel, it will have around 200hp at the wheels, or about 150kw at the wheels. it isn't exact but it is pretty close to.

Oh yeh sorry didnt mean to confuse you. I know stock power outputs are at the flywheel, I more meant it as in the 20odd kw flywheel advantage will of course equate to a generally slightly higher figure at the wheels then an R33.

Yeh my car had 215rwhp, so 215 engine Kw is possibly close to what it really had. Either way at the track it ran 160km traps which was ok imo

he is running a PFC, so ecu isn't an issue

looks like you have some sort of issue going on there judging by the dyno graph (depending on a few things). are you running a boost controller or is the 10psi just what it is climbing to on it's own?

to be honest, i would put it down to being one of a few possible things.

1: tired engine

2: crap tune

3: the foward facing plenum (wouldn't be the whole cause, but certainly won't be helping the situation and may be part of the cause of the tired engine as you will get uneven airflow which can result in major leaning out in cylinders 5 and 6 and running rich in 1 and 2. the plenums are designed to have air come in from the side so having it come in from the front is going to give drastically different flow characteristics than what it was designed to have)

Yeah i thought as much, ill have to do a comp check next time i have a day off, im also looking at replacing the plenum with one from plasmaman

As far as the tune goes, im not fussed about out right power, i just want a nice responsive engine. hopefully when i get a new set of coil packs in it he can run out the sluggishness.

Thanks for all your help so far will update once i get the coil packs in.

Chris

Edited by toorock which
isnt the boost climbing a little to slow? its the standard turbo? i remember you

would sneeze on the throttle and mine would be at 10psi.

that depends on whether he has the boost set at 10psi, or whether he is using the stock actuaotr setup and it is simply creeping up to 10psi. if he is using the stock setup then that is fine. if he is using a boost controller to set it to 10psi then there is something wrong

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...