Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The rb30 'forklift' (thanks paul) will pick up and crush an rb26 in every aspect of performance let alone the rb25 :D

The r35gtr has increased capacity for every logical reason, easy and effortless power delivery.

My previous rb26 feels like a 2 stroke in comparison haha.

Anyways, will be good to get your take on it when you kick your rb30 in the guts

shouldnt be too far away. Elite dan built the new dump pipe today. all thats left is to plumb in the gate and a cuppla minor things and we are hopefully away.

I'm hoping you're right marko. :thumbsup:

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hopefully you'll obtain the same sense of satisfaction 'stacking crates' as we do. :(

Mark, don't u mean " stacking cars" hehe

To date, not 1 car has fallen off my forks...to hell with it, I'm looking at stackings motorbikes, much more challenging

Get my context :O

Mark, don't u mean " stacking cars" hehe

To date, not 1 car has fallen off my forks...to hell with it, I'm looking at stackings motorbikes, much more challenging

Get my context :D

LOL, they do get a fright when they try to "flex their muscles" and you start gaining on them :banana:

It's a horse!!!!

yes...30 bottom ends give you an instant increase in length...your Mrs will be walking like John Wayne tomorrow.

Marko Polo...my lowly RB26 made 550AWKW with 26psi using 98 from the BP the other night.

Edited by Swiper the Fox
yes...30 bottom ends give you an instant increase in length...your Mrs will be walking like John Wayne tomorrow.

Marko Polo...my lowly RB26 made 550AWKW with 26psi using 98 from the BP the other night.

U got that right paul, chicks flock for the bigger bottom end.

Btw that is a great result...550awkw from a baby rb26 hehe

wasted in a forklift....rb30s belong in tow cars :)

Duncan, I am truly disappointed in you...how about I give u a taste of the big bottom end?

Stevo, robbie ward will put these guys in place :) I might just send him a pm to stir the pot

Duncan, I am truly disappointed in you...how about I give u a taste of the big bottom end?

Stevo, robbie ward will put these guys in place :) I might just send him a pm to stir the pot

Whats Stevo ever done that was any good? Robbie Ward however...RB legend!

yes...30 bottom ends give you an instant increase in length...your Mrs will be walking like John Wayne tomorrow.

Marko Polo...my lowly RB26 made 550AWKW with 26psi using 98 from the BP the other night.

At what revs?

For those that give a tinkers toss.

18 lb of boost. 7000 rpm, 470 hp. tons of fuel in it, but quite happy to run it there for a bit just to make sure all is well. It brings boost on 1000 rpm sooner than the 25.

Cant wait for 25 lb. :)

At what revs?

you will have to ask Mrs Line that question as ive already ran it past Noel and he insisted a gentleman never speaks.

Oh you were refering to my car...sorry...

it was at idle with the choke pulled out about 3/4 of the way.

Edited by Swiper the Fox
Duncan, I am truly disappointed in you...how about I give u a taste of the big bottom end?

I'm going to assume we are still talking about cars :|

but that sounds like a fair swap - you can take my tow car for a drive and I can make sure your gtr works ok.

For those that give a tinkers toss.

18 lb of boost. 7000 rpm, 470 hp. tons of fuel in it, but quite happy to run it there for a bit just to make sure all is well. It brings boost on 1000 rpm sooner than the 25.

Cant wait for 25 lb. :)

whats that in metric? don't you guys have that yet??

i love how much more easily the 3l make solid useable power. 3.4l will be the next big trend. there is indeed no substitute for cubes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...