Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Boys and Girls,

In the market for a new boost controller as I'm only running a GFB bleed valve at the moment.

Did a search through the form for what people think of various controllers and didnt really find alot of info.

So im just looking for what people have used and found to be good etc etc.

Car is 32 GTR, forged, bigger turbos, lost of boost etc etc.

Note:I'm running PFC with Z32 AFM to be added soon and would greatly prefer stay with the FC.

Cheers,

Mitch.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/314165-boost-controller/
Share on other sites

best controller to use to date (for me) is the AVCR.

have also seen excellent results from the greddy profec B spec 2 and blitz dual SBC.

personally think eboost2 is best at holding boost (from what ive seen)

and hate anything HKS (havent seen one work to a satisfactory standard yet professionally tuned or not)

FYI PFC boost control kit is similar to the AVCR for use.

GL

The ACV-R is not, it is older tech now by many years.

All you need to do is find a dual-stage solenoid one.

Anything like a Blitz Dual SBC, HKS EVC 4,5,6 - are all excellent choices in the dual solenoid department.

Like most things, totally comes down to whoever is setting it up understanding the finer details. Setting up a EBC isn't rocket science but sometimes people set the gain incorrectly and get poor boost curves and so on.

having extensively used EVC 3 4 5 and 6 I have to disagree and say they dont belong on that list.

cars i have seen them work well on were cars that could run actuator pressure faultlessly, and the only car ive seen run highboost successfully with an evc was an evo9 with a 1.5 bar actuator. funnily enough it was running....... 1.5 bar.

other cases were cars running mild boost ups that would run consistent boost levels off straight actuator pressure. anyone experiencing a pressure drop off the actuator could never tune it out with the evc, and thats professional tuners inclusive (no names).

to run big boost id be looking at a eboost2. i know of one running a flat 27psi from threshold to redline on a 15yo 10 pound actuator.

I have the PFC boost control kit, it does the job, doesnt spike, I havent had a problem with it

I do agree its probably older technology and theres better out there but if you want to keep your interior free of extra gauges, units whatever then the PFC Boost control kit is good cause you can just control it through your hand controller... if you dont have a handcontroller then yeh probably go with something else lol

having extensively used EVC 3 4 5 and 6 I have to disagree and say they dont belong on that list.

cars i have seen them work well on were cars that could run actuator pressure faultlessly, and the only car ive seen run highboost successfully with an evc was an evo9 with a 1.5 bar actuator. funnily enough it was running....... 1.5 bar.

other cases were cars running mild boost ups that would run consistent boost levels off straight actuator pressure. anyone experiencing a pressure drop off the actuator could never tune it out with the evc, and thats professional tuners inclusive (no names).

to run big boost id be looking at a eboost2. i know of one running a flat 27psi from threshold to redline on a 15yo 10 pound actuator.

Like i said - always comes down to whoever is setting it up most of the time.

I know 3 friends that ran them without issue. One currenty in a car now... works fine!

Most of the time, yes, but not when I'm working on it >_<

As for the eboost2, I cant honestly be totally sure as Ive only seen it in one car, but it was definitely most impressive. Yet reference some of the BIG drag cars with BIG boost and they also run the eboost2, so that's saying something. I don't mean 30 pounds either lol.

forget about solution mode, what do you want the boost controller to do?

if you just want a single fixed boost, then just skip everything and pick the most suitable sized actuator spring

no need for controllers, wires, etc etc, if you want to bleed more out / run 2 stage then go from there

forget about solution mode, what do you want the boost controller to do?

if you just want a single fixed boost, then just skip everything and pick the most suitable sized actuator spring

no need for controllers, wires, etc etc, if you want to bleed more out / run 2 stage then go from there

I would like to be able to run 2 stage, have high low settings, i've heard some of the models can change boost settings in each gear >? 

scramble boost is a pretty cool little trick but it isnt necessary.

Cant really fauly the Blitz SBC R for the price at the moment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...