Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys just wondering what is the better option. I know people say that there is minimal if any top end hp difference but ive also herd that cats also help with the exhaust flow through turbulence etc. Is this true? and if it were wouldnt a high flow cat be alot better for the car all round rather than a de-cat? Just wondering because ive just purchased a decat and wondering whether it was the right choice to go for a straight through 3" pipe (not counting the high flow muff before the cannon at the back)?

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/317509-decats-vs-catpipes/
Share on other sites

Remember exhaust characteristics are different for an N/A and a turbo car. A dump pipe on a turbo car should theoretically be as big as possible, you want the best flow possible period. However, on an N/A car it is different, it is more complex, an exhaust restriction can help with down low power but reduce top end and vice versa.

Whereas a nice large dump pipe on a turbo will give better response and top end, its a win win. Up to a point obviously where any increase in flow doesnt make any difference.

In summary to your question, the decat pipe will be better performance wise on your turbo car.

Your cat must be very restrictive to cause such a change, most cars would barely notice a difference. When you remove it, the exhaust is flowing a lot better meaning more boost, meaning more air for the engine causing it to run lean.

Define running like shit? loss of power? If its extremely lean you will loose power.

Edited by Harey
so explain why my car runs like shit when i run open dump pipe but runs tops when i put a cat on?

soz 4 highjacking ur thread

probably coz it hasnt been tuned for that set up.

yeah exactly right,

when i had my cat taken off and a decat put on the tune was very lean and the car made 260rwkw on the same boost, which was down from 285rwkw with the cat, but with a little tweaking of the Nistune to correct the mixtures. the car was able to make 320rwkw with an extra pound of boost.

i went to a decat because my cat was restricting flow because the guts of it had come loose and was moving around in there.

if you got an aftermarket ECU get it retuned, if its stock. then maybe the extra flow is just too much for the ecu to handle?

A good high flow cat will be quite expensive, around the $500~+ range. Metalcat comes to mind but the postives outweigh the negatives, probably a small 10-15rwhp possibly to be made by running straight through but the legality of being found out with no cat and having your car slapped with a major defect and towed away makes up for that.

I was running a decat. I put my cat back in, and did feel the car seemed to run better or soother with it on. It was down a little in power....but the car felt better to drive.

Yup it could do that. Are you running the standard ecu?

All you are doing is improving your exhaust flow, which has to be a good thing, it just means sometimes the ecu is not ready for it and needs to be adjusted.

Had my car around three years now and when I first got it I used a holesaw with extension to core out my cat and the whole insides disintegrated and just simply fell out (alot easier than trying to bash it out. that’s if it’s in pretty good condition like mine was). I found that when I first did it my exhaust note changed ever so slightly (more aggressive but probably more due to gaskets constantly blowing out at the time) and boost response is slightly better and went to rev limiter fine on stock boost. HOWEVER since I have now fit FMIC and played with the boost a bit it definitely starts to lean out around 5000-5500 and above.

(I’m only running 8-8.5psi due to R&R as I have a massive CAI which was causing compressor surge and R&R. Its now partially blocked until I get Haltech and tune. And yes I have cleaned my AFM, gasket gooed, taped and cleaned my coils and re-gapped to .8.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...