Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I will have to look into this sometime.. cbf taking my subframe out yet though.. someday and hopefully before then someone else has done it... What about cutting them because theyre pretty much the exact opposite of yours instead of going in the go out. like a little bump

..well I think the bump faced upwards I can't remember actually

Edited by 30edR32
  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

These looks promising.. Not that you can see the otherside of them but I'm assuming theyre flat, although they still need the standard collars so I don't know if they will make jack all difference ah sorry scratch that its late and im going blind... it says "standard lower sub-frame collars/brackets" so you can leave the top ones off I'm guessing

http://www.racemod.com.au/images/products/...rame_mounts.jpg

Well they have the same ones for R32

Edited by 30edR32

Does this mean that setting the pineapples to all round position is the best for NOT lowering the subframe?

http://www.whiteline.com.au/instruction/203a_KCA349.pdf

What other ideas are there for a daily driver type of car?

Edited by Harey
Does this mean that setting the pineapples to all round position is the best for NOT lowering the subframe?

http://www.whiteline.com.au/instruction/203a_KCA349.pdf

What other ideas are there for a daily driver type of car?

thats right... by inserting pineapples... your actually making it worse.. they can be anywhere from 10mm to 15mm thick.. for a street driven car.. the only real option is not lowering your car excessively.. but if its a street driven car, you'd probs be hard pressed to be in a situation where your pushing it hard enough for the negative effects to show.. its really only on a racetrack where your really going to notice it...

its one of those comprimises you have to make... im of the opinion that if you have a performance car... performance comes first.. streetabilty comes second.

thats right... by inserting pineapples... your actually making it worse.. they can be anywhere from 10mm to 15mm thick.. for a street driven car.. the only real option is not lowering your car excessively.. but if its a street driven car, you'd probs be hard pressed to be in a situation where your pushing it hard enough for the negative effects to show.. its really only on a racetrack where your really going to notice it...

its one of those comprimises you have to make... im of the opinion that if you have a performance car... performance comes first.. streetabilty comes second.

But the pineapples can be inserted underneath the subframe. Yes it wont push the subframe up much but it definitely wont lower it (when the pineapples are installed in the all round position ie underneath subframe).

mounting the pinapples like that isnt going to give much of an increase in handling, they are just acting as a spacer for the nut.. the initial idea of the pinapples was to change the alignment of the cradle... nose down for less squat for drifting etc.. tail down for more squat for drags etc..

the handling increase comes from mounting them top and bottom and taking hardening up the crumbling cradle bushes.. but to get the best handling, you have to fully lock or eliminate those cradle bushes..

if you want a comfortable drive, leave them alone.. if you want to tighten up the cradle for better handling but less comfort.. get alloy lock rings..

it all comes down to what you want to achieve and what your prepared to do...

some guys even take it further than Simon...

DSC00399.jpg

would you recommend the alloy lock rings for a street car.. you say less comfort but that doesnt bother me too much.. aslong as its not going to damage anything.. and any good good alloy lock rings? links or pictures would be sweet.

Thanks

are you meaning these

http://www.jappartsuk.com/store/uploads/im..._large/1159.jpg

or

http://www.jappartsuk.com/store/uploads/im..._large/1158.jpg

Edited by 30edR32

the second ones are the slip on lock rings.. they are very easy to install.. and yes id recomend them.. they are fine on the street when the pay off is more control.. coilovers decrease comfort ten fold over what the rings do.

the first pic are replacement alloy bushes... you'd need to remove the subframe, get the old bushes pressed out, and then put those ones in..

these ones are better

IMAG0063.jpg

DSC02760.jpg

because they allow the subframe to sit hard against the chassis.

ahk.. yeah I'm not really too worried about whats the easiest option.. just the best I've already had the rear subframe out to change bushes and it wasn't fun.. guess I'll do it again though. And if those on a street car aren't gunna damage things, whered you get them from?

mounting the pinapples like that isnt going to give much of an increase in handling, they are just acting as a spacer for the nut.. the initial idea of the pinapples was to change the alignment of the cradle... nose down for less squat for drifting etc.. tail down for more squat for drags etc..

the handling increase comes from mounting them top and bottom and taking hardening up the crumbling cradle bushes.. but to get the best handling, you have to fully lock or eliminate those cradle bushes..

if you want a comfortable drive, leave them alone.. if you want to tighten up the cradle for better handling but less comfort.. get alloy lock rings..

it all comes down to what you want to achieve and what your prepared to do...

Sorry I wasnt saying pineapples are the best thing to do, just saying that the pineapples dont have to lower the subframe. It depends how you install them.

i had alloy lock washers in mine and i hardly noticed any more NVH... not compared to adding super low and stiff coilovers, exhaust, low profile tyres and wide rims..

cradle lockers sill have the rubber to act as a vibration absorber.

trust me fit solid alloy bushes and you'll feel everything haha.

Yeah seen Nigles subframe.. IMO way over the top and not needed but he likes to tinker so more power to him.

Pineapples dont do anything when fitted on the base of the subframe..not sure why they even recommend it.

cradle lockers sill have the rubber to act as a vibration absorber.

Pineapples dont do anything when fitted on the base of the subframe..not sure why they even recommend it.

They do the same thing the cradle lockers do, they just stiffen up the subframe movement to a lesser extent. Saves pulling the subframe off and more inclined for a street car that NVH is important on.

I dont understand why people suggest putting pineapples in the squat position when the ultimate is to solid mount the subframe which does not alter the diff pinion angle anyway??

Edited by Harey

because its an outdated theory. From s14/r33 onwards the cradles have anti squat built into the subframes via pinion angle change.

30edR32 looks ok. whats the material used?

not a fan of the designs where its just a straight through hole. i like the ones that i had made and designed with a mate (i might be biased) because it retains the step washer that nissan use. as well as the front plates.

They're duravar UHMW polyethylene.. meant to be stronger than polyurethane ..if they are what they say they are then theyre stronger as -ene has more carbon bonds than -ane, but thats a different subject all together

Edited by 30edR32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...