Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi LAD`S & LASS`ES,

OK RIDE HEIGHT`S WHAT you HAVE,

PLEASE PHOTO`S OF FRONT & REAR`S,

Type of SHOCK`S & spring`s PLEASE,

I will start with FRONT`S just need to fit rear`s to day & will POST ,

Ohlines with rsr spring`s,Stock & Ohlines now Ohlines is 35mm shorter then stock ok,

post-36964-1274849083_thumb.jpgpost-36964-1274848817_thumb.jpg

Cheer`s Chuckie.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/
Share on other sites

Is your car green, Bob? If so, it's more of a twin to my car than Hugh (66yearold)'s or his son's - neither are s1 RS-Four's converted to manual!

Mine's lowered on the Sydneykid Bilstein/Whiteline set-up, no idea of front and rear ride heights, I'll have to measure them later.

Old photo:

NewWheels2.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5255688
Share on other sites

Ok ,

Back`s in & ride height is 380mm :) ,

Rear Shock`s are NISMO,

so here`s rear height & pic of Shockie,

Side on of car too ,

post-36964-1274856319_thumb.jpgpost-36964-1274855998_thumb.jpgpost-36964-1274855154_thumb.jpg

Cheer`s Chuckie,

PS,SIDE ON PHOTO`S Would be BEST as we all see what car look`s like , :P:(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5255865
Share on other sites

Yep my car's dark green like yours (not so keen on the light green) got an R33GTR box and looking for some R33 or R34 GTR rims!

Is your car green, Bob? If so, it's more of a twin to my car than Hugh (66yearold)'s or his son's - neither are s1 RS-Four's converted to manual!

Mine's lowered on the Sydneykid Bilstein/Whiteline set-up, no idea of front and rear ride heights, I'll have to measure them later.

Old photo:

NewWheels2.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5256926
Share on other sites

Looking good there SABBAi mine is opposite to yours 340 rear and 330 front, I am thinking of changing it to 340 all round, bit worried about to much camber and killing my tires.

I hadn't even given the cv joint a thought

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5258629
Share on other sites

Not sure what my car is at, but it's low and i had it up on the hoist today. The inside of my tyres are f**ked due to the camber! as are my front CV boots, Just more money i can spend on the car without adding to it's appeal. yay haha

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5258997
Share on other sites

i'll point it out again in this thread, tyre wear is due to bad toe settings (excessive in or out)

you can have tyres last a long time with alot of camber

So i ha a quick look, what do i need to get to adjust toe setting?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5259414
Share on other sites

I agree about the incorrect toe killing tires really quick because thats how i killed my first set they only lasted a year and totally bald.

if you have the right camber setting's your tires will last a lot longer then if your running a lot of camber from lowering your car, in time the inner corner of your tires will be worn and the outer will still have plenty of tread left, if you where running correct camber all of your tires would wear evenly,

well that how i understand it, correct me if i am wrong

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5260415
Share on other sites

I agree about the incorrect toe killing tires really quick because thats how i killed my first set they only lasted a year and totally bald.

if you have the right camber setting's your tires will last a lot longer then if your running a lot of camber from lowering your car, in time the inner corner of your tires will be worn and the outer will still have plenty of tread left, if you where running correct camber all of your tires would wear evenly,

well that how i understand it, correct me if i am wrong

I know it will shag out the inner edge of tyres quicker than a sensible camber setting.

I am assuming the significant negative camber is being used for cosmetic reasons but I can't understand why a proper alignment wasn't done and all variables were checked and adjusted when new rims or suspension height changes were made.

To me it seems obvious that if you don't check and set all aspects you will get excessive tyre wear.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5260565
Share on other sites

I know it will shag out the inner edge of tyres quicker than a sensible camber setting.

I am assuming the significant negative camber is being used for cosmetic reasons but I can't understand why a proper alignment wasn't done and all variables were checked and adjusted when new rims or suspension height changes were made.

To me it seems obvious that if you don't check and set all aspects you will get excessive tyre wear.

my comment wasn't directed at you wolverine, i was questioning mike's comments about the correct toe, I am no suspension expert but that was how i understood it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5260594
Share on other sites

i'll point it out again in this thread, tyre wear is due to bad toe settings (excessive in or out)

you can have tyres last a long time with alot of camber

???????????????????????????????????????????? assuming you rotate the tyres often and have totally neutral toe, what's your solution with negative camber (say, 3 degrees negative all round), to wear out the middle of the tyre?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5260669
Share on other sites

of course if you run a lot of camber you'll get uneven tyre wear. that's pretty self explanatory.

my statement is that you can get plenty of life out of your cambered wheels if you have good toe settings. it is to do with camber thrust, which i won't go into detail, but this may explain it to most

When a wheel is set up to have some camber angle, the interaction between the tire and road surface causes the wheel to tend to want to roll in a curve, as if it were part of a conical surface (camber thrust). This tendency to turn increases the rolling resistance as well as increasing tire wear. A small degree of toe (toe-out for negative camber, toe-in for positive camber) will cancel this turning tendency, reducing wear and rolling resistance.
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5260670
Share on other sites

???????????????????????????????????????????? assuming you rotate the tyres often and have totally neutral toe, what's your solution with negative camber (say, 3 degrees negative all round), to wear out the middle of the tyre?

you're missing my point i think, and i'm a little confused as to what you're trying to ask?

if you're running 3 degrees negative camber of course you're going to suffer from tyre wear to the inner edges, and if you rotate them you'll end up with worn shoulders on both sides with more tread in the middle - which is the norm.

if you want your tyres to wear dead even, then run zero static camber (which i wouldn't recommend) but even still they won't wear dead even due to independent suspension and dynamic camber (camber changes under load).

my original point is, if you want to get the most out of your tyres with a little negative camber, run a couple of degrees toe out

i hope that's helped?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5260679
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes that’s what im trying to decide. Should I do stock gtt box or enclosed or open pod. 
    • Also, I note OP is in Melbourne, which begs the question... are you aware of how illegal your car will be with a turbo, and intercooler and any sort of filter change? I don't know how you can get past the "2 intake mods" "rule" that seems to exist in Vic. Fully engineered might or might not get you there.
    • If you have a turbo... then the ducting holes I used to feed the pod are not available because your intercooler likely uses them. If you have an intercooler, your IAT's are going to be goverened by how good your intercooler setup is. I'm yet to really see anyone check IAT with a snorkel/boxed pod/proper CAI versus and unshielded pod. It would be interesting! But I suspect that the differences would not be so noticeable as if you were N/A as the intercooler is where the air is being cooled.. and out in front where the FMIC would be is a pretty good spot for it.. When I was turbo I pushed the stock GTT box as far as I could and made some pretty good power out of it, and noticed on the street I never made the same power/boost. Then I did a before and after run with a pod filter versus the box and picked up about 9PSI from the same boost duty cycle and about 50KW instantly. I never ran the stock box again, and recently removed it for my N/A setup. The box is restrictive to a degree - Even with the V8 setup I noticed I picked up power by removing the box completely, so punching holes from the bottom of it to get air from the passenger guard *helps* but the most effective one in my case was simply having the ducts, a pod, and no box around it. In my experience, *more* air was better than cold air. The air (with ducts) will be cooled off as you start moving, and especially if you start moving fast (a race track). It actually moves around quite a bit as you can see.  
    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
×
×
  • Create New...