Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dyno tune will be a while still when I'm ready to adjust the cam gears.Until then its road tuned

N1GTR.. Technically the only thing new about this is the actuators, and I'm sure if you purchaced -9 from gcg etc. they would put on the same 8.8psi actuator like what I got. Otherwise, same -1 / -9 / Gtss unit.

I think response can be tweaked further with the tune and also with boost control as there is no creep and very minimal spike(1psi) as is right now, so definately some gain to be have there, even if minimal.....and then there are cam gears

Have only been driving it a few days, but it does pull a touch harder on 13psi, But so far I'm satisfied that I have turbs capable of 300rwkw with stock like response.

Aaaaaah my bad!

Here's what I thought you meant;

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarrett/products/turbochargers.html#medium

GT2854R - 471171-9

GT2859R - 707160-9

GT2859R - 780371-1

GT2860R - 707160-5

GT2860R - 707160-7

GT2860R - 739548-9

GT2860RS - 739548-1

GT2860RS - 739548-5

GT2871R - 472560-15

GT2871R - 743347-1

GT2871R - 743347-3

GT2871R - 707160-10

GT2871R - 780371-2

GT2871R - 743347-2

GT2871R - 743347-4

GT2871R - 771847-1

GT2876R - 705330-1

GT2876R - 705330-2

This is the last dyno tune I had, -9's, nismo pump, 555cc injectors, nismo AFM's, cam gears, stock engine.

post-12712-0-13533100-1318426627_thumb.gifpost-12712-0-59905300-1318426635_thumb.gif

Figures in all wheel killerwasps.

Since then I have fitted a different boost controller and the wastgates are now set to open at 16PSI with controller off.

Needs another tune to set boost controller and get rid of the drop in boost pressure. 22PSI tune to follow.

I'll let you guys know....

Aaaaaah my bad!

Here's what I thought you meant;

http://www.turbobyga...ers.html#medium

GT2854R - 471171-9

GT2859R - 707160-9....Gtss

GT2859R - 780371-1....Gtss with act

GT2860R - 707160-5.....2530

GT2860R - 707160-7....R34 N1

GT2860R - 739548-9

GT2860RS - 739548-1

GT2860RS - 739548-5

GT2871R - 472560-15

GT2871R - 743347-1

GT2871R - 743347-3

GT2871R - 707160-10....Gtrs

GT2871R - 780371-2....Gtrs with act

GT2871R - 743347-2

GT2871R - 743347-4

GT2871R - 771847-1

GT2876R - 705330-1

GT2876R - 705330-2

post-42272-0-02044400-1318454661_thumb.png

:thumbsup:

I guess they didn't say anything about injector duty.

I was seeing roughly 90% on a cold night with 22psi peak in the midrange through to 17psi or so at the top end. Rich enough to see black out the back on full boost :whistling:

Stock fuel reg too....

Should be okay, guess I'll find out.

Well since there is NO info on this here I just thought i'd put this up and update as I go along.

The comparision below is results for the -1 turbo which is the -9 that comes with a 8.8psi actuator from Garrett, compared to stock R33 Gtr turbos.

post-42272-0-01856100-1318371152_thumb.png

The top window is the -1/-9 which reaches the same level of boost(13.3psi) about 200-300rpm later than the stocks, and the car drives basically the same as before.

The ONLY thing changed was the boost level was raised only one notch on the controller (profecb2) to get the same level for comparision....start/gain etc was left the same and the pfc tune was untouched.

My boost control kit reads 1psi low for some reason, hence 13.3psi

Ignore the scale on the bottom as this would be different due to the length(secs) of each log

Well with two turns in on the actuators I was able to get it down to stock like response, well on paper at least....To me it feels even better than stock coming into boost

post-42272-0-75110700-1318977532_thumb.png

Top -1/-9, bottom is stock

Is boost creep the only thing to look for with too much preload? I want to shorten them some more :yes:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This coupled with 6-9 speed autos with ridiculously short gearing is why these modern shitbox cars always seem so fast off the line. If it wasn't for those things, Raptors would not seem fast. The problem we have is there is a driveability gap between a more gentle take off and a wheelspinning sideways launch. The difference between ankle flex required to achieve one and ankle flex required to achieve the other is about 0.5°.
    • Yeah I think I'm also with the opposite here. It's 'hard to keep up with traffic' because in the real world I'm accelerating with 15% throttle and they are pinning it. It feels like I'm being an overt dickhead at anything above 15% throttle, so the car sounds like I'm being an overt dickhead to keep up with/get ahead of traffic when I'm really just trying to drive with traffic. There would be no issue 'keeping up with traffic' if we used the same level of throttle input/aggression to drive around. People really do just drive around with their foot nearly pinned in econoboxes.
    • To be fair it's the other way around. 300kw is boring in a modern Golf or BMW. They are so competent / well-engineered / devoid of emotion that you have to go stupid fast to feel anything. Whereas the <300kw RB still makes all the right noises and it feels good to drive. Can pull off at the lights with the turbo whooshing and the blow-off pssshing and feel like the coolest kid on the block. Just don't look to the side where you'll see the bored housewifes in their shitbox Yaris/Corolla/Camry that kept up because you didn't go fast at all
    • 300kW is so boring in a Skyline, you'll get spanked by someone's mum's Golf with Alibaba pipes, and an email tune.
    • Wow! how times change 2017 $15k seems expensive... now $30-$50k is the price.  
×
×
  • Create New...