Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I was driving my R33 home from work today and noticed when accelerating from 80 - 100 in 5th under heavy load there was a chatter coming from the engine bay somewhere. Not too sure what it is but I did notice that my A/F ratio is running pretty rich (13 - 13.5)

I took off the pod recently and put back the stock airbox however I think the SAFC was tuned with the pod on.

Any thoughts on what the sound might be?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/325312-chatter-noise-under-load/
Share on other sites

14.7 is stoich, but you only use that for cruise. when it comes to putting load on in a turbo car then you want things to be 12 or less (anything higher than about 12.5 at high boost and rpm is going to have a short life), however at 80 to 120kmh in 5th gear you are pretty low in the revs so 13.5 probably wouldn't be too far off the mark.

what did the noise actually sound like? was is like a marble in a tin can? if so then that is most likely pinging, which is bad. however if it starts doing it more often in other gears and rev ranges then you may have a broken manifold stud and the sound is the gasket vibrating.

if the sound was more like it was misfiring then it's either your coils or spark plugs

It may be pinging as Marc said. If so, you can top up your fuel with extra toluene (methylbenzene) just to check.

Alternatively, octane booster can be used; but 1x bottle will make little difference. 2x bottles are needed to check.

If pinging ceases, then your state of tune will need to be rectified.

thanks for the replies guys,

when driving home on some nice road it didn't really sound like marbles in a can. oddly enough the only sort of sound I can compare it to was two pieces of paper hitting each other really quickly. It also isn't a constant noise.

Ill put some octane booster in over the weekend to see if it helps.

Might also go through the engine bay to see if anything is loose.

  • 2 weeks later...

Well I finally got one of the NVH guys at work out over lunch to listen to the chatter.

Found out that the sound of coming from the gearbox/gear stick.

When I am accelerating in 5th gear and push the gear stick up and to the left the chatter sound becomes worse but when the gear stick is pulled slightly downward it goes away.

We were thinking it may be gear boot related. Has anyone else had this issue before?

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...