Jump to content
SAU Community

What Is The Difference...?

POWR34

By POWR34,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Simon-S14 Grand Master

Simon-S14

Posted
Posted

a lot of missinformation in that thread.

the compression ratio is the same between the neo and older rb25's.

turbo is different. head has solid lifters and different cams. intake manifold is a better design.

rods are suppose to be GTR rods.. but ive never yet had that confirmed. pistons are the same as is the block.

lachlanw Veteran

lachlanw

Posted
Posted

one has 206 kw . one has 184 . nuff said .

what exactly do you want to know ?

lots of random stuff

neo head has bigger exhaust valves than gtr, combustion chamber is a lot smaller , top feed injectors , new cas . no coil bracket . coils bolt straight to head . takes gay lil oil filter . has bigger exhaust housing on turbo .

bubba Grand Master

bubba

Posted
Posted
RB25DET NEO runs hot burn technology, basically the gases burn at a higher temp which causes less emissions-not sure how that works but it does-closer to EU standards

Which is why the Neos seem to have an 80-82deg thermostat as opposed to the earlier 76.5deg ones.

GTScotT Grand Master

GTScotT

Posted
Posted
one has 206 kw . one has 184 . nuff said .

You do realize that the above information is irrelevant dont you? That 22kw would be like pissing in the wind for the R33 motor to make with the most minor of changes to the ecu.

As per OP, major differences with the neo is the head and intake. The neo head has a smaller dome in the and will not work with such things as RB26 pistons etc. The intake manifold is said to be more efficient and uses top feed injectors which are cheaper to outsource.

End result of similarly modified motors is relatively similar :cool:

aleks Community Regular

aleks

Posted
Posted
a lot of missinformation in that thread.

the compression ratio is the same between the neo and older rb25's.

turbo is different. head has solid lifters and different cams. intake manifold is a better design.

rods are suppose to be GTR rods.. but ive never yet had that confirmed. pistons are the same as is the block.

Pistons are definately N1 so they are not the same. Oil pump is a N1 with a small crank collar.... can't remember rods.

wasnt me Collaborator

wasnt me

Posted
Posted

bit off topic. but i didnt realise the r33 and r34 gear boxes were a bit different. i got this from a nissan review of thr r34

quote.

Shot peening is applied to the first, second, third and fifth gears of the manual transmission for improved strength and durability to accommodate the higher engine torque. A double cone synchronizer is also provided in the first gear position, in addition to those previously used in the second and third gear positions, for smoother, easier shifting. Moreover, a pull-type clutch for easier operation has been adopted in the manual transmission on turbocharged models.

aleks Community Regular

aleks

Posted
Posted (edited)

I don't know the full history of my engine, it has about 120 000kms on it. It had a genuine head gasket, bearings and timming belt in it So it doesn't look like the engine has been pulled apart.

I realise the difference between the pistons, my pistons have the thinker top ringland. (should of said N1 type pistons)

Also is "n" with a single dot above it are the markings for N1?Because my oil pump also has this marking.

I could be wrong.... would be keen to hear from someone who has actually pulled a Neo apart.

I'll be able to throw up a few pictures on here in a week.....

Edited by aleks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Dose Pipe Sutututu
      R34 GT-T cycling ABS pump

      By Dose Pipe Sutututu · Posted

      Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • TurboTapin
      CD009 RB Conversion

      By TurboTapin · Posted

      Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • GTSBoy
      33 GTR Broken front wheel knuckle

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • MBS206
      33 GTR Broken front wheel knuckle

      By MBS206 · Posted

      Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • Bennym35
      New guy

      By Bennym35 · Posted

      The roof is wrapped
×
×
  • Create New...