Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

chasers tune on a knife edge sometimes.... racepace tune could have been safer

I actually thought opposite, my car was tuned stupidly safe.. Made the power but it was just stupidly laggy, they gave me a pretty dyno sheet to say i made power but it was all uptop and useless downlow.

My favorities from driving peoples cars, and graphs and talking to people..

Status Tuning - Dr.Drift

well as i said before i went with status tuning and couldnt be happier with the service and the tune !! my car feels so much smoother but gets up to speed alot quicker its great.

i went from 171rwkw to 188rwkw which will make me happy untill iv dont my suspention and breaks then my target is atleast 235rwkw,

anyway here is the dyno sheets.

oh yeah its a series 2 r34 gtt with

blitz FMIC

jjr belmouth dump pipe

cusco 3" high flow cat

drift pod filter (makes no diff)

running 12.1 psi boost

post-70954-1283477222_thumb.jpg

thanks again trent the car felt great on my way home !!.

woh... you had some wavy ass curve going on there initially ey? :banana:

Nistune? is this the first time tuned or has it been tuned before?

no first time nistune ! on the first run trent said that dip is were i would feel the change the most .

right oh, looks fantastic now, you'll definitely notice it that's for sure.

do you have an aftermarket catback exhaust?

yeah its a 3" jasma (very quiet ) trent said if i get rid of the center mufler i would get more power but for what it would cost it wont be worth it !!, also he said iv im chasing more power down the track its better to have the quiter exhaust so i dont get hastled by the cops .

well as i said before i went with status tuning and couldnt be happier with the service and the tune !! my car feels so much smoother but gets up to speed alot quicker its great.

i went from 171rwkw to 188rwkw which will make me happy untill iv dont my suspention and breaks then my target is atleast 235rwkw,

anyway here is the dyno sheets.

oh yeah its a series 2 r34 gtt with

blitz FMIC

jjr belmouth dump pipe

cusco 3" high flow cat

drift pod filter (makes no diff)

running 12.1 psi boost

post-70954-1283477222_thumb.jpg

thanks again trent the car felt great on my way home !!.

Good work,

Hopefully i can nistune my car soon =D

Any other differences apart from a smoother drive? I.e. Do you feel a big power difference mid-top range?

Cheers!

Heres my tune from Trent, this is my 2nd tune from trent with a new turbo, been thrashing my car for 2 years now with trents 1st tune and and this 2nd tune and still going strong!

geraus1.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

i went from 171rwkw to 188rwkw which will make me happy

On the stock ecu you made 171rwkw and made a 18rwkw increase from nistune?

I'm not very well informed about skylines as I own a s15 but that power figure is impressive for a stock ecu.

I have pretty much the same mods on my s15 and make something along the lines of 145rwkw :starwars:

Oh and will be heading to Status/Chequered Tuning when they have free spots!

On the stock ecu you made 171rwkw and made a 18rwkw increase from nistune?

I'm not very well informed about skylines as I own a s15 but that power figure is impressive for a stock ecu.

I have pretty much the same mods on my s15 and make something along the lines of 145rwkw :P

Oh and will be heading to Status/Chequered Tuning when they have free spots!

Yeah it had a boost increase already to 11 psi so the base peak was good to start with but look at 3000 and 5000 rpm.

3000rpm gained 20rwkw and 30nm

5000rpm gained 45rwkw and 70nm

that's where the differences really show.

Good work,

Hopefully i can nistune my car soon =D

Any other differences apart from a smoother drive? I.e. Do you feel a big power difference mid-top range?

Cheers!

hell yeah since trent did his work she just keeps pulling strong its a great feeling

before the tune if i wound out 4th gear it would run out of legs but that just isnt there anymore its a totaly different car i love it

thanks again trent

hell yeah since trent did his work she just keeps pulling strong its a great feeling

before the tune if i wound out 4th gear it would run out of legs but that just isnt there anymore its a totaly different car i love it

thanks again trent

Lol winding out 4th only on a private road of course :P

Yeah it had a boost increase already to 11 psi so the base peak was good to start with but look at 3000 and 5000 rpm.

3000rpm gained 20rwkw and 30nm

5000rpm gained 45rwkw and 70nm

that's where the differences really show.

oh wow a nice torque and power gain!

I'm very impressed with the tune and skylines in general :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...