Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The Bayside blue R34 GTR has SSR Professor SP1's. Notice how the stud pattern blends into the spoke design. Same wheels as mine.

SP1's have a flatter spoke design whereas the Meisters spokes curve more.

The 3 Piece Work Meister will have the stud patterns separate from the spokes making the rim "look" smaller.

^ thanks for confirming!

whilst i am here, i may as well post another pic of my gtr hehe...here is a pic with the funky rear tail lights illuminated :) now with better quality image!

post-8728-0-29196500-1334114131_thumb.jpg

Edited by Marko R1

^ thanks for confirming!

whilst i am here, i may as well post another pic of my gtr hehe...here is a pic with the funky rear tail lights illuminated :) now with better quality image!

Fitment of filling out the guards look good.

What wheel size, offset and type of wheels you running?

Fitment of filling out the guards look good.

What wheel size, offset and type of wheels you running?

wheels are 19x9.5 +30, axis wheels which have a lot of dish & surprising as light as japanese wheels when i looked the at wheel weight chart

wheels are 19x9.5 +30, axis wheels which have a lot of dish & surprising as light as japanese wheels when i looked the at wheel weight chart

Yeah right.

9.5 wide wheels sit so nice on a R32 GTR, fills it out nicely.

Welldone!

P.S. Since when do you venture out of the "Aussie Delivered R32 GTR's" thread? :laugh:

Yeah right.

9.5 wide wheels sit so nice on a R32 GTR, fills it out nicely.

Welldone!

P.S. Since when do you venture out of the "Aussie Delivered R32 GTR's" thread? :laugh:

haha this is true - most of my time these days is in the ADM thread - when i had my black gtr though, i lived & breathed in the forced induction "rb30 thread" - things change i guess :)

haha this is true - most of my time these days is in the ADM thread - when i had my black gtr though, i lived & breathed in the forced induction "rb30 thread" - things change i guess :)

Haha!

That's cool, all good man!

above r34 is a ztune not s tune, the rims are a custom offset lm gt4 made only for the r34 ztune but cant remember what the offset is exactly

i think mark was referring to the R32 S-tune in the pic he posted.

i find myself mistaking people's attachments for signatures in the new layout

Edited by alex182

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...