Jump to content
SAU Community

Best Skylines Of Sau


Darmanin10
 Share

Recommended Posts

this ones a little different, im pretty sure hes on SAU but i got these photos from JDMST

IMG_3458.jpg

IMG_3461.jpg

Fucking mad as!

The poke fitment (Mexican) with the wheels is huge and it'd look better with bolt on flared guards.

But still looks awesome.

From memory the owner is on SAU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im all for phat wheels and bigger offsets, flat drag style wings etc.......but this doesnt look good....sry my opinion, esp in Burgundy (worst colour for any car ever) the wing looks like an after thought, the wheels despite having huge dish are uglier than a Porsche phone dial on a hunday........esp after seeing the last few 34's and the Nismos (/drool) this car just looks like someone is poking fun at skylines....

sry...i dont normally apologies for my thoughts, but there is alot of love in that car, and im sure to alot of people it looks awesome.

its the comedy car i'd take a photo of a car show to spread the laughs :thumbsup:

I agree with you, don't think that car really belongs in this thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

R34 GTR N1, nuff said

Resized to 94% (was 1024 x 680) - Click image to enlargeTerry-98.jpg

Resized to 94% (was 1024 x 680) - Click image to enlargeTerry-96.jpg

Resized to 94% (was 1024 x 680) - Click image to enlargeTerry-101.jpg

Resized to 94% (was 1024 x 768) - Click image to enlargeTerry-62.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
    • Yes that sounds right. Cars currently in the shop for the engine work. Will need to remeasure .. but yes I think I must be targeting 45cm from fender. 
×
×
  • Create New...