Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

cool thx for clearing that up :D looks like the 32s all had pretty interesting results

I was sure that redbacks nur would be pulling more than he did which is why I thought i'd ask

-D

Redbacks car, from what I heard, is running a very "light" tune...

  • Replies 329
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Redbacks car, from what I heard, is running a very "light" tune...

correct and did you see the plumage of black smoke coming out of it mega rich = power loss

both mainline dynos

when i got my car back it made 239 rwkw @ Jaustech monday then made 235 awkw @ Willall on Friday 4kw difference Martin looked @ the dyno readout from Jaustech and set his dyno up exactly the same ramp rates

honestly they are Champs i rang him @ 4:30 asking can i get an AFR check and i need it ASAP he got me on within 30 mins and spent like 1hr as hose clamps blew off and what not then only charged $70 which he quoted

but i cant speak highly enough of Martin either rang on friday said can i get him to look @ my tune and said bring it down after lunch and spent time with me getting a hiccup out

Is there a video of the day at all with the cars being run? Would love to get a copy. Filmed the 32 on the dyno but the sounds clips before the cars even get an decent power happening.....didn't help the little sis took the camera for a camp the same weeked :P

great day thanks to everyone for behaving as executives we have heard nothing but praise

BIG thanks to Gareth for putting every car on Thank you Martin and Thanks to Paul

saudynoday2010.jpg

Some nice power outputs there Maz!!! :(

Glad to see the day was a success :)

*WARNING* NSFW - You may wet yourself.

OMG HI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :(

Ben, David has a PowerFC - in fact it is the R32GTR one out of the R that was written off in Targa Tasmania a few months ago (as his old one shat itself). And yes, it is tuned rich as FCUK atm while he fully runs in the motor. Mind you he is not out for HUGE power, as he has chosen response rather than massive numbers - he is running a pair of HKS 2530s - my favourite turbo :)

There is a school of thought that washing the oil off the bores with excess fuel will bed the rings in faster - just not at my school :)

Seriously though, some nice cars and power outputs there on the day. I did guarantee you 600+ Nigthcrawlr, thankfully it delivered!

Ben, David has a PowerFC - in fact it is the R32GTR one out of the R that was written off in Targa Tasmania a few months ago (as his old one shat itself). And yes, it is tuned rich as FCUK atm while he fully runs in the motor. Mind you he is not out for HUGE power, as he has chosen response rather than massive numbers - he is running a pair of HKS 2530s - my favourite turbo :)

yeah, i went with the brand new N1's for that very reason too, and even at 250kw it rocks my jocks.. just want to join that elusive 300kw club if at all possibly without rooting stuff up - will wait and see what martin says about rebuilding my xfer case before i get too serious tho

-D

EDIT - And if he has a pfc, turbos and a nur, whats he waiting for? lol... a full tune will be so much better for his power, response, engine cleanliness and wallett - get he wants to run it in but if he wants to run it in, just keeping it under 5000rpm with a nice tune for the first 5000k would be enuff wouldnt it?

Group buy on rebuilding transfer case?

depends. getting gearboxes out of gtr's is not a quick job, would cost a fair bit i'd imagine, and I dont have a spare xfer case so my car would be off the road while that gets done.. ;\

have to wait n see what martin says.. i know a lot of the parts used in the rebuild are relatively cheap but its very labour intensive from all accounts

-D

If you are in no dire need of your four wheel drive system to work as sharply as it did from the factory then keep going with your existing transfer case. Like every other part of the car they wear out, and the more power, the faster :)

We have several rebuilt cases that we had done (new frictions and steels) that we swap out from time to time on the cars. The parts are available from Nissan :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...