Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have these Poncams for sale. They are for a series 2 R33. Poncams bolt straight in, no solid lifter conversion required. I bought them from Nengun brand new 6 months ago and now my plans have changed so they are no longer needed. They are brand new.

$700

Postage available at buyers expense.

Call or text me (Josh) 0409 064 864 or email [email protected]

Cheers.

post-47146-1280117957_thumb.jpg

post-47146-1280117966_thumb.jpg

post-47146-1280117971_thumb.jpg

post-47146-1280117974_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/330378-r33-s2-tomei-poncams/
Share on other sites

When I bought them from Nengun there was only an option for Series 1 or 2 so they'd be for later Series 2 when the sensor changed as that's the only difference between the S1 and S2 Poncams.

Edited by josh.s
  • 2 weeks later...
part number perhaps? just to be sure which ones they are

They are definitely series 2, I had to buy a late model sensor to fit them, but never got around to actually putting them in.

Still for sale.

Edited by josh.s
so for these cams to work in a Series 1.....i would have to get a R34 NEO CAS and get the workshop to rewire it?????

Hey champ, I have the correct CAS for it that I can include for a bit extra. It's only 4 wires so it only takes a few minutes to wire up.

To everybody asking about the part number there is only one part number listed on Nengun for an RB25 and it ends in 20. After that it asks you to choose which series you're buying for. I will say it again, they are for a SERIES 2 R33 SKYLINE so pleeeease stop asking. Just in case anybody missed it the first time around:

R33 Skyline Series 2 Tomei Poncams 256deg 8.5mm lift. They are for the late series 2 R33 cam angle sensor which is the same as the R34 sensor.

If you STILL don't believe me, then you can request closer photos, but only if you think you might actually buy them. I'm not wasting my time if you're not genuinely interested...

  • 1 month later...

Well I have no explanation for that as I have a Series 1 CAS on my car and it is a different fitment to what the Poncams would accept. I bought a Series 2 CAS and it was the correct fit.

These are still for sale. I need these gone as the box is just gathering dust.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...