Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

give me some thoughts and tell me which picture you prefer, I'm 50/50 and can't decide which one to print.

if you have a clear favorite, tell me what it is about the processing and pic you like, or what it is you don't like about the other.

[Group%201]-DSC_0990_DSC_1010-21%20images.jpg

[Group%201]-DSC_0990_DSC_1010-21%20images_blue.jpg

  • Replies 174
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yea i like the 1st one better.. 2nd one looks fake PP.

Also there are a few spots which is still in colour and havnt been converted to black n white. Look at rear of the car, near the wing.. You can see a patch under it which you forgot to select ;)

Edited by siddr20

Much better, if the first one didn't have that extra car it would have helped.

I'm bored, might head off to take some pics around the hood tonight instead of beer. well.. before fewer beers :thumbsup:

Much better, if the first one didn't have that extra car it would have helped.

Cheers dude. Yeah my bad with the parking in the first photo... Also need better weather, better gear and moar skills. Excuses excuses :thumbsup:

Took some photos of my gf yesterday. Her best friend is trying to get a portfolio done for her makeup, so we decided to have a bit of a fun shoot and try a few things out. I'm surprised my gf accepted the shoot.

The following shot is just a test pic i took and a test photo for me to edit etc.. I do love this shot tho.. Maybe its the stupid, but funny expression by my gf.

Makup: By Danni.I

Model: my gf

Location: my home studio

Lighting: Two Alien Bee Strobes (used a large octa box, and a beauty dish).

IMG_2884_resize.jpg

-----------------------------

Will most likely use these two shots for the final set. Still got hundreds to go thru.. Just opening up random pics and processing them.

oh behind the scene shot:

40226_10150271684010457_605520456_14419537_7912315_n.jpg

^ sorry linked off facebook.

IMG_2793_resize.jpg

IMG_2854_resize.jpg

awesome lighting, nice shots, gf isn't bad either :D haha

can you explain the beads on head thing? I don't get it, but i see it everywhere. Am I missing something?

Still got lots of photos to go thru, so hopefully find a better shot in there somewhere.

From a photographers point of view, its to make your subject stand out. Show others something different than a normal head-shot. Its all about being creative i guess.

From a make-up artists point of view - well this is their creation, showing others that they can do something bold/striking, yet creative and effective for a photoshoot.

My gfs friend is just starting to make her portfolio, so i guess its a good start for her.

I made a thread over weekend, it got deleted when the server died. Took some pics of Benm's car on friday night. only one of my remote triggers was working. hopefully just batteries. Here's some pics.

CC appreciated as alwasy :D

DSC_3705_small.jpg

DSC_3720_small.jpg

DSC_3734_small.jpg

DSC_373733_small.jpg

DSC_3761_small.jpg

Made him a wallpaper too.

wallpaper_small.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...