Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if you went for a twin scroll GT3071R with a 0.78 housing you could get close to 300kw with cams and it would have a stupid amount of response. but this will be an expensive route as you need a twin scroll exhaust housing and you need twin gates to do it properly.

Another turbo that people haven't suggested is ether a TD06SL2-20G for just under 300kw or a T67 for over 300 with standard cams. Both these will need external gates as both the Trust and T3 flanged housings are external gate housings.

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

reason i ask is volk34 had his car on the same dyna pack dyno as you a couple weeks back and made 210kw. then today at the SAU-SA dyno day at willals

his car made 162rwkw. thats a 48kw difference between his 2 dyno runs

sorry to use your car as an example volk

There is something else going on there, in the past with the older version there was around 10% difference between dyna pack dynos and other drive on chassis dynos due to no correction for wheel slippage, but the newer versions seem to be pretty much the same as most mainlines.

Your talking about a 24% difference which sounds to me like something else is wrong. Also 162 would be just under what would be expected from a standard auto R34 (don't know what car his is) or is about right for a stock untouched R33. so what mods is he running, has his car been tuned? is it running more boost? was it running the same boost in Willals dyno?

Edited by D_Stirls
There is something else going on there, in the past with the older version there was around 10% difference between dyna pack dynos and other drive on chassis dynos due to no correction for wheel slippage, but the newer versions seem to be pretty much the same as most mainlines.

Your talking about a 24% difference which sounds to me like something else is wrong. Also 162 would be just under what would be expected from a standard auto R34 (don't know what car his is) or is about right for a stock untouched R33. so what mods is he running, has his car been tuned? is it running more boost? was it running the same boost in Willals dyno?

i think he has a auto r34 gtt. as for the other stuff i cant comment because i dont know.

"loksta6" you are now on notice and will receive an official warning..........followed by a ban if this slander towards a business continues.

Your post has been deleted but have attached a link to your warning fyi.

If anyone has an issue with a business, take it up with them but KEEP IT OUT OF HERE!!

thanks for all of your responses, as i had suspected gt3076 with .86 will be the one. i have all suporting mods and an eye out for some poncams. hopefully see and introduce myself next dyno day :P thanks.

i am pretty much going the same way mate

I'd get the .82 again if I was to buy another turbo. Response difference between .63 and .82 would only be a couple of hundred rpm max. And your going down the E85 route so the better flowing rear will make a world of difference when you start running higher boost levels. Come to think of it. Just get the 1.06 :D

after doing a bit more of a research your right Luke......63 and .82 rear housings dont have a world of difference in regards to response.....1.06 is in a league of its own isnt it??? :D

.63 rear housing should see me 300rwkw on 25??? mind you its going to be internal gated

ahh internally gated's a different story. get the .82.. you'll run into overboost issues with the smaller housing and IW.

FWIW mine is ex gated type .63 and makes 360 rwkw so the housing can flow more then 300 rwkw thats for sure.

While on the topic of turbo upgrades, I was looking into mix matching housings, staring with my 2530 ...

I'm thinking of upgrading the compressor side of my HKS GT2530 turbo.

The turbine side of the 2530 atm is a 76 trim (53.8 major - 47.0 exducer) wheel and 0.64AR T3 housing which I was going to keep.

Thinking of throwing on, on the compressor side ...

Garrett T04S upgrade kit

wheel: 59 / 76 / 60 trim

housing: AR70 (rated to 550hp)

Now the 2530 is internally gated. I'm looking for a responsive daily driven turbo for 250+awkw, with enough poke for track days and time attacks.

There is another T04S compressor kit, which may be too big for the 76 trim turbine ...

Garrett T04S upgrade kit

wheel: 61.4 / 82 / 56 trim

housing: AR70 (rated to 600hp).

Thoughts?

What you are in effect making is a GT2876R, they are a crap miss-matched turbo as the small turbine can't produce enough drive to drive the compressor wheel to full efficiency. The biggest i would go with a NS111 turbine wheel is a 71mm compressor which will give you in effect a GT2871R.

If you remember Ryan was running a GT2871R on his R33 and he was making 250 kw with stupid response. I would keep the T3 housing and buy a GT2871R CHRA and make up what Ryan was running

Garrett elude to the miss-match of the GT2876 when they state on the website;

* Best suited for unique applications such as asymmetric turbo installations

* Not recommended for general performance applications

Edited by D_Stirls
What you are in effect making is a GT2876R, they are a crap miss-matched turbo as the small turbine can't produce enough drive to drive the compressor wheel to full efficiency. The biggest i would go with a NS111 turbine wheel is a 71mm compressor which will give you in effect a GT2871R.

If you remember Ryan was running a GT2871R on his R33 and he was making 250 kw with stupid response. I would keep the T3 housing and buy a GT2871R CHRA and make up what Ryan was running

Garrett elude to the miss-match of the GT2876 when they state on the website;

Thanks for that. Now I've got a better starting point to go shopping :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...