Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What valve do you have on order?

This one Valve

I may indeed not need it now. I may even bring my problem back... ARC do a catch can that returns to the dipstick that uses a check valve also..

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

right where to start.lol.

we have had alot of issues in the uk with the rb30,s on track whether it be an rb25 head or 26. on the road mine blows nothing, on spirited driving it blows nothing,zero, on track it throws it into the catch can. i run a tomei oil pump. back restrictor is blocked of fully, front one runs a .65 restrictor, yes you read that correctly. i run mines cam baffles and silkolene 15/50 pro oil. my cam cover pipes go to a catch can, from there the vent pipe goes down to another catch can near the sump. from that catch can the other pipe comes back up and vents to atmo behind the drivers headlight. the main catch can behind the drivers headlight also has a drain to sump on it..this has sorted all the track blowing oil out issues. i have done leak down, compression tests the lot. if you run an rb26/30 on track hard with over 1.6 bar boost or 650bhp it will blow oil out end of, what you have to do is control it and return it back to sump..its seems the 26 is suited for track and the 30 just isnt, we have a dozen or more here with the same problem including the original ripps uk001 engine. to4z powered. at castle comble the other year it blew a gallon of oil into the tank after 20 laps...?.this one was built by rob himself is very famous. was fitted to a white 33gtr that ran 10,s in nz. bernie uk

p.s if i build another i would put a .25 restrictor in the front and block the rear.i have just done a comprssion test on mine with the cam covers of,even without it running just turning over the cams are soaked with oil thats pumped up..

Edited by rockabilly
..its seems the 26 is suited for track and the 30 just isnt, we have a dozen or more here with the same problem including the original ripps uk001 engine. to4z powered. at castle comble the other year it blew a gallon of oil into the tank after 20 laps...?.this one was built by rob himself is very famous. was fitted to a white 33gtr that ran 10,s in nz. bernie uk

I really don't see how a RB26/30 can be any different to a RB26 in terms of oil control. Same head, same restrictors, same oil pump etc...

Also I am not sure about all these one-way valves that are being mentioned - keep it open so it can 'vent' as well as drain..

Vent the sump to the back of the head (it may not act as a drain but more likely relieves sump pressure and allows the oil to travel back down to the sump via the factory oil drains more easily). And have a decent drain back from the catch can to the sump. This will act both as a drain when it needs to, and also as another sump vent when its empty.

Running too small a restrictor at the front surely can't be good for valve spring temps and valve train in general?

I run a 1.5mm front and a big baffled 9L sump and the theory is that even if it does chuck oil out to the catch can it flows straight back down to the sump again.. so who cares. (but yes, avoiding it getting to the catch can in the first instance is the better solution I agree.)

good pionts mate, we have built many engines and i too cannot find why the 30 blows oil out. the only design differnce in the two is the windage trays?. one has them and the other does not. i suppose running toyo 888 on track wont help .lol..

OP, do you run a windage tray?

At 8000rpm the breeze coming off the crank counterweights is around 300klm/h. What that wind can do to oil returning from up top shouldn't be underestimated. It can even disturb oil that's lying in the bottom and make it airborn.

I'm suprised more of you guys with high hp big buck engines aren't running dry sumps? It sure makes life easy, and negates The major downfall of a high revving RB.

Edited by Marlin

I run the Windage trays on my Rb30. So I can safely say they don't fix the issue. I machined the girdle to suit. No oil squirters. As for the check valve, I have had the best result from not using one. I also agree it will stop the crankcase venting with a check valve installed. I can understand however why an off the shelf kit has one as they still use the standard emissions savy PCV and vac lines which would want to suck oil up from the sump.

I have a track day on Sat so will be a good test of the current setup which seems to make a world of difference.

I have a fair wack of oil in the inlet still. I wonder if the previous crankcase pressure was not doing any favours for the turbo oil returns also. You almost need to run a vac line to the sump...through a third catch can ----> that would be even better than just a vent/Filter. It would encourage the head oil to drain and the turbo oil returns.....hmmmmn

So from what I can see. Having a crankcase breather and catch can sump return-----other wise known as an 'open loop' or 'atmo' oil/air separator system is the key to oil control in GTR with over 400kwatw.

Some very good info in this thread. Seems the understanding of our issue is moving to the next level. Also seems like the rear head drain setup that Spool sell should be called a breather/oil return.

Matt

Edited by BoostdR
I'm suprised more of you guys with high hp big buck engines aren't running dry sumps? It sure makes life easy, and negates The major downfall of a high revving RB.

.....and how would I run my Aircon compressor then? :)

I have a fair wack of oil in the inlet still. I wonder if the previous crankcase pressure was not doing any favours for the turbo oil returns also. You almost need to run a vac line to the sump...through a third catch can ----> that would be even better than just a vent/Filter. It would encourage the head oil to drain and the turbo oil returns.....hmmmmn

Some people do this by venting the catch can to the exhaust system. The speed of the exhaust gases suck the fumes from the catch can. If your sump is vented to the catch can this might help create the vacuum you're looking for.

I haven't done this myself, am only repeating what I think I have read elsewhere so someone might correct me in this..

Some people do this by venting the catch can to the exhaust system. The speed of the exhaust gases suck the fumes from the catch can. If your sump is vented to the catch can this might help create the vacuum you're looking for.

I haven't done this myself, am only repeating what I think I have read elsewhere so someone might correct me in this..

:) I will steer clear of this one, it has smoke screen written all over it...lol

at 90 degrees on track i see the following, running tomei pump as it came, acl race bearings

1000 rpm 3 bar

2000 rpm 4 bar

3000 rpm 4.7 bar

4000 rpm 5.6 bar

5000 rpm 6.5 bar

6000 rpm 7.4 bar

7000 rpm of gauge 8 bar,but i have a capillary too that shows 8.5 bar

but this piont things are moving fast and its difficult to concentrate on a stupid little gauge in the corner. :):banana::bunny:

Edited by rockabilly

Yeh you can vent your catch can breather into the exhaust via a 1 way check valve. So back fires wont pressurise your catch can and engine. The fitting needs to be welded at a angle similiar to how you would merge a wastegate outlet to your exhaust. The exhaust flow rushing past creates a vacuum and that opens the 1 way valve and draws any oil/air into your exhaust....However having alot of oil in the can will only lead to copious oil fumes. Only good if you have the oil control sorted and it alleviates the need for air filters on the can.

Best setup is individual lines from cam covers to can and a crankcase vent from inlet side of sump to can and a return from can to exhaust side sump. The way the crank spins, it creates a vacuum on the exhaust side encouraging oil drain (oil return holes are on this side) and return from the head, while the inlet side is what vents the crankcase of blowby pressure. The direction of flow is the same as the crank's clockwise rotation. Similiar principle to windage. Its why crankscrapers always face the crank at a tangent to its swinging arc, from the inlet side. Or why the louvers on windage trays are bent up towards the exhaust side.

Hopefully this will help. :)

post-12828-1285104912_thumb.jpg Please excuse my lame paint skills.

Edited by r33_racer
.....and how would I run my Aircon compressor then? :)

By running the exact same setup as we run on Berry's time attack R34 that's how! :thumbsup:

The complete kit is available from High Octane, retains air con :)

Yeh you can vent your catch can breather into the exhaust via a 1 way check valve. So back fires wont pressurise your catch can and engine. The fitting needs to be welded at a angle similiar to how you would merge a wastegate outlet to your exhaust. The exhaust flow rushing past creates a vacuum and that opens the 1 way valve and draws any oil/air into your exhaust....However having alot of oil in the can will only lead to copious oil fumes. Only good if you have the oil control sorted and it alleviates the need for air filters on the can.

Best setup is individual lines from cam covers to can and a crankcase vent from inlet side of sump to can and a return from can to exhaust side sump. The way the crank spins, it creates a vacuum on the exhaust side encouraging oil drain (oil return holes are on this side) and return from the head, while the inlet side is what vents the crankcase of blowby pressure. The direction of flow is the same as the crank's clockwise rotation. Similiar principle to windage. Its why crankscrapers always face the crank at a tangent to its swinging arc, from the inlet side. Or why the louvers on windage trays are bent up towards the exhaust side.

Hopefully this will help. :)

post-12828-1285104912_thumb.jpg Please excuse my lame paint skills.

at 90 degrees on track i see the following, running tomei pump as it came, acl race bearings

1000 rpm 3 bar

2000 rpm 4 bar

3000 rpm 4.7 bar

4000 rpm 5.6 bar

5000 rpm 6.5 bar

6000 rpm 7.4 bar

7000 rpm of gauge 8 bar,but i have a capillary too that shows 8.5 bar

but this piont things are moving fast and its difficult to concentrate on a stupid little gauge in the corner. :):D:)

This is with a .65mm restrictor? Are your measurements in metric?....just to make sure

metric?. my gauge reads in psi i just converted it for you guys.. believe me when i did a compression test this week and the cam covers were of as i was checking valve clearances at the same time, with the cas disconnected and wot the oil that was being pumped to the cams was unbelievable. i suspect with a 1.5 mm in there and 8000rpm there would be a gallon a miniute in them covers, no cam baffle will help that, its no wonder they breath. if i built another i might even reduce it more, its frightening how much oil get up there from such a small hole, god forbid i left both the oil feeds in, the sump would empty..lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...