Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Just wanting to know if anyone had seen these speakers before, they were in the front. My brother thinks they are the factory speakers, but I think he's wrong. I'd say they would have been installed in Japan as Carrozzeria is a rebrand of Pioneer in Japan (I think).

I tried a google search for the model number but came up with nothing.

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/33758-have-you-seen-this-speaker/
Share on other sites

Wouldn't surprise me.. Over the years the 33 shipped with a crap load of different speaker options.. I've seen alpines, blaupunkt, mine came with clarion splits (although really really crappy ones! lol), all factory.

Cool, thanks guys. Looking at the connectors on the speakers and the wiring going to them, it looks to me that they are indeed stock...

just because the speakers are using the original wiring doesnt mean the speakers themselves are standard. I highly doubt those speakers were in the car when it was driven from the showroom.

they are made by pioneer. though all the sites that had any info on them were japanese.

so i suppose they were only sold mainly in japan??? not to sure.

they have been replaced by the TS-E series speakers p_ts-e1795.jpg

Pioneer site :

Pioneer carrozzeria

they arent stock ones. i had 4" stockers and they were TERRIBLE, so old and crusty

but mine had a carrozerria cd head unit and carrozerria sat nav - tv combo

head unit was cool only 35 watts tho, replaced with a full alpine deck out with subs and speakers, much better

with nissan in japan people are more keen on stereos than they are here in aus u can get brand packages in japan or even extra options installed when u are getting the car.

you can also buy aftermarket speakers after you have bought the car. And also saying that the Japanese are "more keen" on car stereos... well..... i dunno about that.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...