Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Posting up question for a mate.

He is running the following parts:

Balanced RB30 Crank w/ machine press fitted crank collar

Ross Harmonic Balancer

N1 Oil Pump

JPC Billet Gears

This is what it looks like after only 5000k's.

post-2140-1285644532_thumb.jpg

This siezed the motor completely. Once the oil pump was taken off it turned over.

Anyone had similair problems as this is the second set of oil pump gears that has been destroyed?

After the first time he fitted the balancer and upgraded to billet gears as he wanted to make sure it didn't do another oil pump.

Any suggestions on what could be the problem?

Cheers

Jamie

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/338445-oil-pump-problems-on-rb2530/
Share on other sites

what sort of balancing was done on your crank/rods and pistons?

ive had a similar problem on my first pump, which was only a standard rb25 pump, standard balancer etc.. and shattered the pump in a similar matter, only the outside ring was also broken into about 9 pieces, but my oil pump continued to work for a few weeks after the time i think i broke and use to lock up every now and then.. which could explain the outside ring being in so many pieces

i have mainly had things suggested that youve already had done.. the harmonic balancer and billet gears, aswell as very good balancing, its hard to make out but your pump seems to have the same unusual wear mine has on the inner gear where it gets driven, as well what looks like heat marks, someone suggested to me that there may not of been enough clearance between the crank collar and the oil pump drive

The last thing i have had suggested briefly that i dont understand at all, was something about checking the clearance of the block for the oil pump, i think they mean making sure that the block that the oil pump sits against is flat, but i may be wrong

hopefully we can get some experts in here with alot more experience and point us down the right direction and maybe enlighten us to anything we may of missed

Jarrod

I had the same problem with my 25/30 i had the n1 on mine and the gears let go but did not damage the housing. I now have the JPC billet gears in my pump and one of there crank collars and i have done power cruise in my car with no problems. I do know that manual cars do brake oil pumps more often then autos as there is more on/off throttle with manuals and if u do bash the limiter more often then that doesnt help the gears. The fact that you have done 2 sets of gears tells me that there must be something wrong with the balancing of the engine or the balancer my not be for a RB30.

Thanks guys, I'll pass on the suggestions.

A bit more info:

Crank was balanced by someone that has plenty of experience.

Forged pistons and rods were used.

Both pump gears and the collar were bought from JPC to avoid possible issues with collar/gear tolerances.

When the crank was pulled they checked the grub screws on the collar to make sure the collar hadn't moved.

It was all still good and hadn't moved since assembly.

I have been told that it was hard to remove from the crank and that the collar had almost fused itself to the inner gear.

  • 7 months later...

JPC gears were binned, they looked rubbish for the money and will not use or recommend them again.

Suspect problem was the collar to gear clearance. Either way when JPC supply the gears and collar together there should be no issue when used on a balanced crank.

My mate had the crank built up instead of using a collar and then rebalanced, welded collar has been built up to suit standard n1 gears by a reputable machine shop in Brisbane.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...