Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 407
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Thanks guys :banana: Will post up more from that gig soon.

A car pic from me (something different)..

IMG_8339a_resize.jpg

IMG_8337_resizez.jpg

runs off and hides......

I will stick to shooting people..

Anyways so did a quick pre-wedding shoot yesterday (30mins was the limit) for my closest friends.. They are getting married next year in Jan. The photo-shoot was just at a local park so nothing special at all in terms of location. Its going to be another incredible wedding with lots of beautiful bright colours. Cant wait for that one..

Just two for now:

IMG_8851_resize.jpg

IMG_8843a_resize.jpg

Nice Sidd! Yeah stick to shooting people :banana: Hahaha kidding.

Car looks like it will never move from there as if its stuck haha, friggin low. Love it.

I was awaiting your call on friday night but you never called. And now i see why you didn't call hahahaha (fashion shoot with pr0n chicks).

Did you shoot anything really tight at the e-shoot? I feel like a lot of emotion is captured in tight shots e.g. headshots etc.. I wanna see 'em, process them and post! Do it, do it!

Edited by FST513

Sorry man by the time I finished it was about 9.30pm.. was too late to come over.

I will swing past sometime this week. You home thursday night?? I have nearly finished processing the wedding photos. 16gbs left i think to process :P

In regards to the shoot above, yea still gotta process all the photos. But first I gotta finish the wedding photos. Will make a blog post soon.

Thanks for the kind words.

Edited by siddr20

Yeah i'll be home thursday night. That's my Xbox night :P

Just let me know.

Well thats good. You still have 10GB of mine to edit/cull haha.

I will send them to you tomorrow via express post.

Some new shots from the latest Project 365

October%2017th,%202010.jpg

October%2013th,%202010.jpg

October%2014th,%202010.jpg

Also - Does anybody know why in PS CS5 on a Windows PC(vista Ultimate) when i use the eyedroppers in either Levels or Curves they don't actually work?

It's like i'm sampling nothing. It works perfectly fine on my Macbook pro with CS5. I'm not n00bing out or anything, it just does nothing!!

Love that 1st seascape shot!! oh and the pic of your dog!!! great photos as always dude :P

Oh and no idea why it doesnt work. Did google help you?

Thanks Sidd :O

Google doesn't help me either. I've tried searching and searched on Adobe forums/support and i can't get the answer i want. I adjust white balance with the eye droppers. Thats why the first seascape has a kind of pink cast (from stacking Cokin filters)...

I don't understand why it doesn't work, but yet with CS3 and CS4 it works? Maybe because its running in 64 bit mode (this is standard settings). Maybe i have to change it to 32 bit to allow it to work for PC? Also, my actions from Nik Software don't work in CS5 unless its run in 32bit mode...

Hhmmmm....

Owen - That picture tells the entire story exactly how it is. Love it.

Also - Does anybody know why in PS CS5 on a Windows PC(vista Ultimate) when i use the eyedroppers in either Levels or Curves they don't actually work?

It's like i'm sampling nothing. It works perfectly fine on my Macbook pro with CS5. I'm not n00bing out or anything, it just does nothing!!

My $ is on Vista, because Vista is gay and can cause all sorts of weird problems

Nope, not selecting a random area or haven't forgotten to click on the layer/mask. It just doesn't do anything. You push the sliders in and then it just resets it to default, doesn't change the white balance. And i KNOW the WB on most shots is off, but it just won't let me fix it!

Yep. Vista is as gay as Matt.

I'm not running 64bit Vista. This is why i use Apple and don't care about PC's anymore.

I think it's time to sell off my PC and pick up an iMac. P00!!!!!

Edited by FST513

Fcuking bush basher Pig Matt! Go clap some sticks together!

Apple envy is FTW!

Owen - I hate to say but today is Sunny as hell and extremely hot... You better get that black light fixed mate!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have wasted too much time on this, more than I am willing to admit. I hope someone can set the record straight for me.  I want to replace my Nismo (non GT pro, non GT) standard 2 way in my R33 GTST with a 1.5 way... Ideally I want to get an ATS 1.5 way Carbon LSD, but I don't want to reuse my 29 spline 5x1 axle stubs, and new 30 spline 5x1's are impossible to get a hold of ($$$), and I don't want to drop the cash on going to 6x1 stubs and axles ATM. Which leads me to the Nismo GT Pro 38420-RSS15-B5 or RSS20, as they come with new axle stubs meant for the diff, and is "Convertible" from a 2 way or 1.5 way to "Other ways", but that is where I am stuck as the documentation is a bit all over the place.  To sum up what I have found I believe the all the Nismo GT Pro PN's are convertible from 2 way, 1.5 way, and 1 way; but Nismo sells 2 skus (2 & 1.5) so people do not have to disassemble to convert it.  I found this thread on 350z but it left the question unanswered. https://my350z.com/forum/engine-and-drivetrain/620032-nismo-gt-pro-lsd-1-5-vs-2-way-and-torque.html  Essentially the way I think it all works out is like follows...  2 way  1 way  and 1.5 way would be the center pinion shaft in the 1 way block, but with the with the center flipped 180*. So the ramped side of the pinion would face the 1 way gate and act like a ramp.    I can only get my hands on the 2 way in the states, and I am not trying to get stuffed on tariffs by ordering from Japan or anywhere else. I want to confirm that if I get the 2 way I can convert it to the 1.5.     
    • Hi everyone, I have purchased my first GTR and I want to do a single turbo conversion to it. I've been doing as much research as i can and there are a few things that I can find and need to know. I need to run a coolant feed, coolant return, oil feed and oil return for my turbo setup. Here's what I know so far: On the hot side of the rb26 there is coolant feed, oil feed and oil return. Coolant return will be going around the front of the engine to where the thermostat is located. I will need to block off the rear oil return port. I will be running a turbosmart boost solenoid so any of the factory boost stuff wont be needed. Now onto what I don't know: 1. What do I do with the coolant / vacuum hardlines that run around the back of the motor?. 2. What do I block off or loop or move or remove?. I will be running the OEM intake manifold. 3. Is there anything in particular I need to buy for the cold side of the rb26?. I already have the intercooler and pipes sorted. If you have any pictures or information it would be appreciated. Thanks....  
    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
×
×
  • Create New...