Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 407
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Thanks guys :banana: Will post up more from that gig soon.

A car pic from me (something different)..

IMG_8339a_resize.jpg

IMG_8337_resizez.jpg

runs off and hides......

I will stick to shooting people..

Anyways so did a quick pre-wedding shoot yesterday (30mins was the limit) for my closest friends.. They are getting married next year in Jan. The photo-shoot was just at a local park so nothing special at all in terms of location. Its going to be another incredible wedding with lots of beautiful bright colours. Cant wait for that one..

Just two for now:

IMG_8851_resize.jpg

IMG_8843a_resize.jpg

Nice Sidd! Yeah stick to shooting people :banana: Hahaha kidding.

Car looks like it will never move from there as if its stuck haha, friggin low. Love it.

I was awaiting your call on friday night but you never called. And now i see why you didn't call hahahaha (fashion shoot with pr0n chicks).

Did you shoot anything really tight at the e-shoot? I feel like a lot of emotion is captured in tight shots e.g. headshots etc.. I wanna see 'em, process them and post! Do it, do it!

Edited by FST513

Sorry man by the time I finished it was about 9.30pm.. was too late to come over.

I will swing past sometime this week. You home thursday night?? I have nearly finished processing the wedding photos. 16gbs left i think to process :P

In regards to the shoot above, yea still gotta process all the photos. But first I gotta finish the wedding photos. Will make a blog post soon.

Thanks for the kind words.

Edited by siddr20

Yeah i'll be home thursday night. That's my Xbox night :P

Just let me know.

Well thats good. You still have 10GB of mine to edit/cull haha.

I will send them to you tomorrow via express post.

Some new shots from the latest Project 365

October%2017th,%202010.jpg

October%2013th,%202010.jpg

October%2014th,%202010.jpg

Also - Does anybody know why in PS CS5 on a Windows PC(vista Ultimate) when i use the eyedroppers in either Levels or Curves they don't actually work?

It's like i'm sampling nothing. It works perfectly fine on my Macbook pro with CS5. I'm not n00bing out or anything, it just does nothing!!

Love that 1st seascape shot!! oh and the pic of your dog!!! great photos as always dude :P

Oh and no idea why it doesnt work. Did google help you?

Thanks Sidd :O

Google doesn't help me either. I've tried searching and searched on Adobe forums/support and i can't get the answer i want. I adjust white balance with the eye droppers. Thats why the first seascape has a kind of pink cast (from stacking Cokin filters)...

I don't understand why it doesn't work, but yet with CS3 and CS4 it works? Maybe because its running in 64 bit mode (this is standard settings). Maybe i have to change it to 32 bit to allow it to work for PC? Also, my actions from Nik Software don't work in CS5 unless its run in 32bit mode...

Hhmmmm....

Owen - That picture tells the entire story exactly how it is. Love it.

Also - Does anybody know why in PS CS5 on a Windows PC(vista Ultimate) when i use the eyedroppers in either Levels or Curves they don't actually work?

It's like i'm sampling nothing. It works perfectly fine on my Macbook pro with CS5. I'm not n00bing out or anything, it just does nothing!!

My $ is on Vista, because Vista is gay and can cause all sorts of weird problems

Nope, not selecting a random area or haven't forgotten to click on the layer/mask. It just doesn't do anything. You push the sliders in and then it just resets it to default, doesn't change the white balance. And i KNOW the WB on most shots is off, but it just won't let me fix it!

Yep. Vista is as gay as Matt.

I'm not running 64bit Vista. This is why i use Apple and don't care about PC's anymore.

I think it's time to sell off my PC and pick up an iMac. P00!!!!!

Edited by FST513

Fcuking bush basher Pig Matt! Go clap some sticks together!

Apple envy is FTW!

Owen - I hate to say but today is Sunny as hell and extremely hot... You better get that black light fixed mate!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...