Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

check paulr33`s FAQ and it might be in there. i think he has said b4 around 100 is where powerfc brings on the warning light unless its been changed by the tuner. ideally below 30. mine doesnt go above 20 unless i cant get 98

mine never really got over 40 from what ive noticed on the hand controller, but this batch of fuel iv noticed it hit 50, 80 a couple of times and once was 92. i still have well over half a tank of fuel left tho so i cant really just change it straight up. got a 4 hour trip to do in it this weekend and and most of that fuel will still be in it...

i always fill from the same bowser at the same servo, shell v-power

mine never really got over 40 from what ive noticed on the hand controller

You've got a hand commander, pull a few degrees timing out of it.

Go Settings, IGN/INJ, reduce the timing by say 5 degrees.

Next time you turn off and re-start it's back to where it was as these are only test settings.

or try a proper octane booster, one that works. You can substitute methanol/toluene if you know what your doing. I know methanol works, a litre in half a tank would probably fix it. Or top the tank up with E85 and have a 50/50 mix.

rolls im not sure what you mean so ill answer to the best of my ability

in low rpms in most gears the knock is very sparatic and climbs easilly over 40, iv i labor it it goes up to 90ish, but if i drop back a gear and rev it out it stays quite low.... not sure here what to do. im about to head out so ill drop 2 degrees out of it and see how it goes, realy hoping its just bad fuel :down:

I mean at what level (number) does it translate to the motor actually knocking or having preignition, obviously it isn't knocking all the time so there must be some threshold +-25% or something where it is actual preignition.

i think your a little confused. pre ignition and detonation are two different things with different causes. also theres no set number that defines knock, you can have a tiny part of the mixture knocking which generally wont do much damage or make much noise (resulting in a low knock number if everythings working properly) or you can have most of the mixture pinging which is obviously bad and would generally produce much higher knock readings. everyones opinion is different but for power fc's most people considering anything under 30-60 safe.

OP, 40 isnt very high at all, like i said either pull a couple of degrees of timing or fill the tank. 90 isnt even all that bad if its at lowish rpms.

Yes I realise they are different things but Im fairly sure a knock sensor will pick up pre ignition as well as detonation, perhaps it does only pick up the later Im not sure. Either way I thought that detonation was pretty much an all or nothing thing, either most of the mixture detonates or it doesn't, is it possible for just a tiny bit to do so?

I guess my real question is how does the scale translate to actual detonation, is there a certain amount of noise (eg 40) where there is zero detonation, and a certain amount where the entire mixture is detonating (255) obviously these would be inexact figures with large spread but I was wondering if there was any documentation by Nissan on what levels generally translate to.

apexi set the engine check light to flash at a level 60 which they believe is enough to warn you

anything over 60 i would be getting it checked by a tuner. the usual culprits when you exceed 60 knock are

too much boost

penis fuel

too much timing

intake temp too high (poor pod, poor intercooler, no intercooler, poor intake, too much boost)

fix one of those to resolve the issue and/or back out timing at the same timing

taking out timing using temp ignition adjust always removes the knocking

i pulled 8 degrees out of it and seen almost no change.... is it possible that my power fc has reset and lost its tune?

its not boost a its only low rpm driving, reving it out its fine, nothing in the intake has changed so im leaning towards fuel

if you've pulled 8 degrees with no change to knock levels then its likely its not actually knocking, possible but unlikely. could be a dud sensor or something rattling in the engine bay near the sensors

are you absolutely sure you pulled 8 degrees? set 1 of your monitor values to ign timing and see what it reads before and after changing the temp adjust

Yes I realise they are different things but Im fairly sure a knock sensor will pick up pre ignition as well as detonation, perhaps it does only pick up the later Im not sure. Either way I thought that detonation was pretty much an all or nothing thing, either most of the mixture detonates or it doesn't, is it possible for just a tiny bit to do so?

I guess my real question is how does the scale translate to actual detonation, is there a certain amount of noise (eg 40) where there is zero detonation, and a certain amount where the entire mixture is detonating (255) obviously these would be inexact figures with large spread but I was wondering if there was any documentation by Nissan on what levels generally translate to.

Knock sensors usually cant pickup pre igniton afaik as its not a metallic knock as such, more an extremely fast, high pressure burn while the pistons coming up, can melt holes in shit. suppose they might pickup a knock at the end of it as the piston reaches the top if its still burning and pings as a result of the pressure, but its fairly different to your normal pinging from too much timing.

its very possible for only a tiny bit of the mixture to ping for all sorts of reasons. poor atomisation, poor chamber design, uneven pressures, hot spots etc can all cause it.

as i said theres no set number for whats knock and what isnt. even if you know exactly whats happening in the chamber at what pressure and burn rate etc do you call it knock instead of just a clean burn? all combustion makes noise, hence why you always have some sort of knock reading when driving, i've never seen a power fc display a max of 1 after a drive. it all comes down to whats safe and what isnt, and again theres no set number and even if there was it'd be different for every engine, ecu, knock sensor etc. you can only go off other peoples and your own experience and opinions, which as i said usually equates to somewhere between 30 and 60 being the safe limit with a power fc. personally i dont even look twice at anything under 60 on my car, but i dont need it as a reliable daily and the motor is just a slapper so i'm not as careful as others might be.

each to their own

Edited by JonnoHR31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
×
×
  • Create New...