Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was just wondering if anyone had any idea as to how sensitive those breath tests are that Vic Pol use??

I wanna go to the supermarket but I tend to load my Carbonara full of white wine, most of it however should have cooked out.

My dilemma though is I'm on my P plates and can't have any booze in my system

even if they do get a reading they take u back to the station and test u there. That will give the ultimate reading. If u werent drinking and the intial breath test came up as positive the 2nd one will prove ur innocence and ur on ur merry way. But if u go to the station and u test positive... ur f*ked.

Also i was watching one of the cop shows on tv (not sure which state it was in) and they mentioned that if you believe the breat test at the station is wrong then you can choose to have a blood test done, at the least it will give you extra time for it to wear off, whilst you in the sells you best do some exercise lol.

That article was good. It's what I thought as I have never had anyone with a positive reading from eating food/mouth wash etc. I have even faulted our PBT's a couple of times recently as have tested some people that I could slightly smell the alcohol and they admitted having couple of drinks and the PBT showed nothing.

You can choose to have a blood test but the alcohol levels decrease MUCH faster in your breath than blood. If you were say 0.07 with breath and had blood taken a hour later you would most likely be 0.08+.

In most cases people's alcohol level are on the rise. They keep rising generally for about 1-2 hours before decreasing. Unless it's just mouth alcohol.

You can choose to have a blood test but the alcohol levels decrease MUCH faster in your breath than blood. If you were say 0.07 with breath and had blood taken a hour later you would most likely be 0.08+.

In most cases people's alcohol level are on the rise. They keep rising generally for about 1-2 hours before decreasing. Unless it's just mouth alcohol.

is it illegal to have an open alcoholic drink inside a car? Ive heard mixed responses. Can you clarify?

As long as you are not over the limit there is no law stating you can't have an alcoholic beverage whilst driving.

That's news - quite interesting.

I thought you are not allowed to eat/drink/use mobile phone/GPS while driving.

So technically I can eat my breakfast while stuck in the daily traffic jam. :)

That's news - quite interesting.

I thought you are not allowed to eat/drink/use mobile phone/GPS while driving.

So technically I can eat my breakfast while stuck in the daily traffic jam. :)

No, the question was can I have an open alcohol container in the car.

Many people believe it is illegal, so if your mate is in the passenger seat with a can, you are breaking the law. That is wrong. It is not illegal. And also, it's not illegal to have a drink while driving as long as you are always in control of your vehicle. Trying to eat 5 weetbix out of a bowl may convince a cop that you were not always in complete control of your vehicle and they may book you. Would be a fair assumption too, and you'd be hard pressed convincing a magistrate otherwise.

And you are also allowed to use your GPS, phone and stereo as long as it is in a proper mounting system and you do not have to hold it.

And to answer the OP, I'd be amazed if you registered. Ethyl-Alcohol has a boiling point ~75c. So assuming your food reached this temperature when cooking (almost certain) and stayed there for more than a few seconds, there would likely be no alcohol left in it. Even if you used half a bottle of wine, there would have been ~ 35gm of alcohol in there. If we assume only half evaporated during cooking (likely to be more if it was boiling for more than 20-30 seconds) there would be ~17g left. If you then ate the ENTIRE meal, you would have 17gm of alcohol in your system which is 1.7 standard drinks. If it took you 30 minutes to eat the meal, and then watched TV for an hour, you would be unlikely to register a reading on a bretho.

Again, these calculations are really, really conservative ie, it's unlikely ANY alcohol would be let in the sauce, let alone 17gms, and of course it's unlikely you ate the entire meal you prepared.

its impossible to fully distill off the alcohol, and the alcohol is usually added in the last 10mins or so of the cooking time.

i cbf to dig up physical property data on the thing but i reckon it still requires quite a high amount of energy to boil off, whats the output of the stove? Lets do a quick energy balance.

its impossible to fully distill off the alcohol, and the alcohol is usually added in the last 10mins or so of the cooking time.

i cbf to dig up physical property data on the thing but i reckon it still requires quite a high amount of energy to boil off, whats the output of the stove? Lets do a quick energy balance.

From the US Department of Agriculture

Alcohol Burn-off Chart Preparation Method Percent Retained alcohol added to boiling liquid & removed from heat 85% alcohol flamed 75% no heat, stored overnight 70% baked, 25 minutes, alcohol not stirred into mixture 45% Baked/simmered dishes with alcohol stirred into mixture: 15 minutes cooking time 40% 30 minutes cooking time 35% 1 hour cooking time 25% 1.5 hours cooking time 20% 2 hours cooking time 10% 2.5 hours cooking time 5%

Based on this, I'd say 40% retain would be close. So that equates to ~15gm of alcohol assuming half a 750ml bottle of 13% wine was used. Eat 1/3 of that and you have ~5gm of alcohol in you, which is 0.5 standard drinks. 15 mins to eat the meal and 15 mins on the couch and it's gone.

From the US Department of Agriculture

Alcohol Burn-off Chart Preparation Method Percent Retained alcohol added to boiling liquid & removed from heat 85% alcohol flamed 75% no heat, stored overnight 70% baked, 25 minutes, alcohol not stirred into mixture 45% Baked/simmered dishes with alcohol stirred into mixture: 15 minutes cooking time 40% 30 minutes cooking time 35% 1 hour cooking time 25% 1.5 hours cooking time 20% 2 hours cooking time 10% 2.5 hours cooking time 5%

Based on this, I'd say 40% retain would be close. So that equates to ~15gm of alcohol assuming half a 750ml bottle of 13% wine was used. Eat 1/3 of that and you have ~5gm of alcohol in you, which is 0.5 standard drinks. 15 mins to eat the meal and 15 mins on the couch and it's gone.

all this talk about alcohol is making me thirsty!

Thanks gdogzgtr for the answer!

Thanks for the answer Graeme. I always wondered about that because a friend got in trouble for me having an open bottle of spirits in his car a few years ago, but I've never got in trouble when my partner is drinking in my car.

Cowboy- wow...thanks for the indepth answer. are you a chef or did you steal that off the net??

I use an electric frying pan, so when it's on high it's something like 120c

its impossible to fully distill off the alcohol, and the alcohol is usually added in the last 10mins or so of the cooking time.

errr no...

the wine is used to deglaze the pan should be maybe 100ml's at most if cooking for 4 and this should be added to the pan while hot to strip the flavours from the bottom of the pan... it is not for the taste of the wine at all

the wine hits BOILING point instantly and will have 0% alcohol within a few seconds

I don't deglaze my pan with it, what a waste of perfectly good wine.

I add it in the last 5-10 minutes, and I usually use about half a bottle, it makes the cream go much further and it makes my tea smell excellent.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...