Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Someone over here in WA just finished their RB30 with EFR8374...

Apparently went 470-480rwhp on a dyno dynamics on at 1.5bar on pump 98. Full boost at 3500rpm

he is pleased with the initial result, but looking forward to some track time to truly evaluate the setup... compared to the -5s he ran previously

madevelopments in the UK just finished up this 2.2L evo, 98ron pumpgas, EFR 9180 1.05 a/r @ only 1.4bar boost:

SimonEFR14barevo9001_zps408c0d8f.jpg

also one of the R34 GTR's i mentioned previously will be dyno tuned next week. RB28 with twin EFR 6758:

1016025_492900630791348_1113246872_o.jpg

1053428_491524577595620_1075480050_o.jpg

1016702_492900624124682_967654255_n.jpg

1262458_525932380821506_1765524763_o.jpg

I agree the 6758's look like quite largish frame turbo's when comparing to the baby framed -7/9/5's and 10's. Obviously the 6758's also make more power than the good "OLD" GARRETTS though also.

The compressor covers look so busy with all thd gadgets as well. Personally I really dont see the point in going twin 6758's with sll the extra custom piping and what not when you can keep it simple and go a 9180.

Josh

  • Like 1

Geoff, I see both boost controllers are connected but in reality only one will be in use and T'd to both turbos correct?

I could be wrong but they look fairly larger than the 6258, more than I would have thought anyway! I would have seen the 67s do nicely on a 30 (or even stroked 30) but does he expect some lag/high rpm kind of power? What's his expectations? 750-800whp?

Is that the car going to WTAC? Or is this another?

Edited by NismoSTune

Those 6758's look like a physically large turbo.

Please post results of that thing as soon as you have a graph please ,Geoff. :D

diameter wise - the EFR's use relative large a/r compressor housings with the integrated BOV so its bigger dia than the garretts youre used to seeing

lengthwise - the EFR's are long, due to the high-flow aerodynamic IWG port and long bearing (overbuilt):

1077465824_5GkwA-L.jpg

i will share results when they're finished, however just got a text message their AEM V2 ecu crapped out and they have to send it back. Next day air commencing today... hes pissed but hoping to get it back early next week.

Geoff, I see both boost controllers are connected but in reality only one will be in use and T'd to both turbos correct?

I could be wrong but they look fairly larger than the 6258, more than I would have thought anyway! I would have seen the 67s do nicely on a 30 (or even stroked 30) but does he expect some lag/high rpm kind of power? What's his expectations? 750-800whp?

Is that the car going to WTAC? Or is this another?

you can run (1) or (2) BCSV's, ive been told by BW it makes no difference. However I was recently talking to some experienced drag racer friends they tell me it works best when seperate BCSV's are used... so i dont know which is best yet but as more cars come together we will have answers

the 6758s are identical housings and dimensions to 6258, the only difference is the larger compressor wheel size. Truthfully, I prefer the twin 6258's on RB engines - i think thats a perfect compliment and balance between spool and power. The 6758 will make more power, he wants 800+whp (street drag racer) so 6258 was a touch too small.

BTW - this is not 9krpm/danh tran's twin 6758 WTAC car, although they are getting close:

1381477_634829979870776_72190535_n.jpg

I agree the 6758's look like quite largish frame turbo's when comparing to the baby framed -7/9/5's and 10's. Obviously the 6758's also make more power than the good "OLD" GARRETTS though also.

The compressor covers look so busy with all thd gadgets as well. Personally I really dont see the point in going twin 6758's with sll the extra custom piping and what not when you can keep it simple and go a 9180.

Josh

Im a single turbo guy too - probably never see twins on my RB26... but theres no denying that these twins have lower inertia, so can spool a little earlier and flow more @ 53lb/min so can make a little more power than the 9180.

Edited by Full-Race Geoff

diameter wise - the EFR's use relative large a/r compressor housings with the integrated BOV so its bigger dia than the garretts youre used to seeing

lengthwise - the EFR's are long, due to the high-flow aerodynamic IWG port and long bearing (overbuilt):

1077465824_5GkwA-L.jpg

i will share results when they're finished, however just got a text message their AEM V2 ecu crapped out and they have to send it back. Next day air commencing today... hes pissed but hoping to get it back early next week.

you can run (1) or (2) BCSV's, ive been told by BW it makes no difference. However I was recently talking to some experienced drag racer friends they tell me it works best when seperate BCSV's are used... so i dont know which is best yet but as more cars come together we will have answers

AEM!!! urgh. Why not pectel sq6?

Then again I run a vipec lmao.

dual boost controllers eh? is there no chance of having one lead/lag and causing issues? I'd imagine its 1 more thing that can go wrong but I don't know.

theyd be wrired in parallel or series?

What do you guys recommend for an rb26 with vcam? I am tossing up between a .92 iwg setup or a 1.05 ewg setup with twin 44mm gates.

Car will be running e85 and I eventually plan on going a 2.8L bottom end but for now im after something that will come up to 20-25psi of boost around 4k

I am leaning towards the 1.05 ewg twin 44mm gate setup as I think vcam will be able to bring it on early enough but interested to hear what you guys think?

Thanks,
Brett

Edited by reaper

1.05 7670

Sorry I should have specified. I'm aiming for the 400-450awkw mark on 25 psi and would eventually like to see 500awkw on 30 psi so I was looking at the 8374's

bit of a catch 22 in my eyes...


the 7670 is more likely meet your spool expectations but will probably max out by 450kw.

the 8374 is likely to exceed 500kw but I am skeptical that you would have it all in by 4k.

Hmm maybe I am being a little unrealistic. The video of the full race r14 seemed like it was on full song around the 4500 mark with an 8374 and 1.05 rear. I figured with vcam id be able to fatten up the mid range a little and get it on a little quicker.

What should I be expecting in terms of response?

Obviously the .92 iwg 8374 would be the more responsive one but i'm a little worried it wont make 500awkw on 2 bar

Just need to find a happy medium I guess but it'll definitely need to be one of the 8374's to reach the peak power I want

Edited by reaper

8374 is what you want. it comes on hard around 3600rpm and full boost above 4k+ rpm. That is a great turbo for the RB26.

chris on here runs the 0.92 8374 on an RB30 if you would like to compare his results, i think lith posted the chart recently. i liked the 1.05 i ran also, since youre on e85 and can run some boost the 1.05 might be a better choice... but the simplicity of the 0.92 IWG is really nice

edit: 7670 is too small for rb26. works great on rb25 tho

Edited by Full-Race Geoff

What difference in spool are you seeing between the .92 and the 1.05 Geoff? I do like the simplicity of an iwg setup however im a little worried the .92 will become a restriction before I hit my target.

Thanks for your help.

- Brett

Are there any 7064 and 7670 .83 T3 results available? Preferably on 2L motors.

Google tells me people either have larger EFR's with the .83 open or twin scrolls on the smaller ones. I am specifically considering T3 framed turbos ONLY at this stage.

What difference in spool are you seeing between the .92 and the 1.05 Geoff? I do like the simplicity of an iwg setup however im a little worried the .92 will become a restriction before I hit my target.

Thanks for your help.

- Brett

Im not a good enough driver to notice or appreciate the change in response that shows up in the lab. EFR's spool so fast it sorta feels the same to me. On the dyno it really doesnt show a big difference in spool, maybe 100-150rpm? driving the car its also not a huge issue. The performance of these is a drastic improvement compared to the traditional turbos we're accustomed to

The real decision maker - is what are your power/boost targets and whether you want IWG or EWG? the 1.05 can carry boost up top, in the high RPMs whereas the 0.92 a/r does great on an rb26 under 2bar but the a/r gets too small after 28-30++psi..

Are there any 7064 and 7670 .83 T3 results available? Preferably on 2L motors.

Google tells me people either have larger EFR's with the .83 open or twin scrolls on the smaller ones. I am specifically considering T3 framed turbos ONLY at this stage.

we've done a lot of 7064 and 7670 on the T3 - mostly with Honda VTEC engines like K20 and K24. These have higher ve and rpm range than most, what engine are you asking about, RB20?

Edited by Full-Race Geoff

It would be for my built SR. Is cammed and forged. Ideally I want to see 500whp when pushed, am not sure the 7064 will get there despite the compressors advertised flow.

Yet I am also worried the 7670 might not have enough poke down low.

How is the EFR8374 with the t3 housing?

great turbo, there was a 2JZGTE with this turbo on the cover of dsport 2 months ago.. since the cylinder pairing is not sensitive we've seen it used on some interesting applications with great results, such as a 5 cyl 2.5L and the audi/lambo V10 (in twins)

It would be for my built SR. Is cammed and forged. Ideally I want to see 500whp when pushed, am not sure the 7064 will get there despite the compressors advertised flow.

Yet I am also worried the 7670 might not have enough poke down low.

for 500whp, go with the EFR7670. If you want some balls down low make sure its twinscroll config :) that turbo does not disappoint!!

Edited by Full-Race Geoff
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did this end up working? Did you take some pictures?
    • And finally, the front lower mount. It was doubly weird. Firstly, the lower mount is held in with a bracket that has 3 bolts (it also acts as the steering lock stop), and then a nut on the shock lower mount itself. So, remove the 3x 14mm head bolts , then the 17mm nut that holds the shock in. From there, you can't actually remove the shock from the lower mount bolt (took me a while to work that out....) Sadly I don't have a pic of the other side, but the swaybar mounts to the same bolt that holds the shock in. You need to push that swaybar mount/bolt back so the shock can be pulled out past the lower control arm.  In this pic you can see the bolt partly pushed back, but it had to go further than that to release the shock. Once the shock is out, putting the new one in is "reverse of disassembly". Put the top of the shock through at least one hole and put a nut on loosely to hold it in place. Put the lower end in place and push the swaybar mount / shock bolt back in place, then loosely attach the other 2 top nuts. Bolt the bracket back in place with the 14mm head bolts and finally put the nut onto the lower bolt. Done....you have new suspension on your v37!
    • And now to the front.  No pics of the 3 nuts holding the front struts on, they are easy to spot. Undo 2 and leave the closest one on loosely. Underneath we have to deal with the wiring again, but this time its worse because the plug is behind the guard liner. You'll have to decide how much of the guard liner to remove, I undid the lower liner's top, inside and lower clips, but didn't pull it full off the guard. Same issue undoing the plug as at the rear, you need to firmly push the release clip from below while equally firmly gripping the plug body and pulling it out of  the socket. I used my fancy electrical disconnect pliers to get in there There is also one clip for the wiring, unlike at the rear I could not get behind it so just had to lever it up and out.....not in great condition to re-use in future.
    • Onto the rear lower shock mount. It's worth starting with a decent degrease to remove 10+ years of road grime, and perhaps also spray a penetrating oil on the shock lower nut. Don't forget to include the shock wiring and plug in the clean.... Deal with the wiring first; you need to release 2 clips where the wiring goes into the bracket (use long nose pliers behind the bracket to compress the clip so you can reuse it), and the rubber mount slides out, then release the plug.  I found it very hard to unplug, from underneath you can compress the tab with a screwdriver or similar, and gently but firmly pull the plug out of the socket (regular pliers may help but don't put too much pressure on the plastic. The lower mount is straightforward, 17mm nut and you can pull the shock out. As I wasn't putting a standard shock back in, I gave the car side wiring socket a generous gob of dialectric grease to keep crap out in the future. Putting the new shock in is straightforward, feed it into at least 1 of the bolt holes at the top and reach around to put a nut on it to hold it up. Then put on the other 2 top nuts loosely and put the shock onto the lower mounting bolt (you may need to lift the hub a little if the new shock is shorter). Tighten the lower nut and 3 upper nuts and you are done. In my case the BC Racing shocks came assembled for the fronts, but the rears needed to re-use the factory strut tops. For that you need spring compressors to take the pressure off the top nut (they are compressed enough when the spring can move between the top and bottom spring seats. Then a 17mm ring spanner to undo the nut while using an 8mm open spanner to stop the shaft turning (or, if you are really lucky you might get it off with a rattle gun).
    • You will now be able to lift the parcel shelf trim enough to get to the shock cover bolts; if you need to full remove the parcel shelf trim for some reason you also remove the escutcheons around the rear seat release and you will have to unplug the high stop light wiring from the boot. Next up is removal of the bracket; 6 nuts and a bolt Good news, you've finally got to the strut top! Remove the dust cover and the 3 shock mount nuts (perhaps leave 1 on lightly for now....) Same on the other side, but easier now you've done it all before
×
×
  • Create New...