Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

sounds to me like you just want to be able to tell people you have a forged engine and that you built it yourself.....

as far as im concerned a standard rb25 thats been serviced and tuned well should hit 200000ks no worries, i'd also trust an unopened used engine more than a first time forged item some guy built in his shed.

your basically spending 5k+ for bragging rights?

lol. im not building this motor for "bragging rights" im doing it because i feel im some what capable of handling the task and the learning experience. fyi my current engine is on 187,800km's, not too far off 200,000 probally been thrashed 90% of its life cause the syncro's are pretty much gone and its got mild piston slap when cold. also my "shed" happens to be a nissan workshop.

I get exactly where you are coming from but you are pretty much guaranteed to fail which would be a pitty considering you would just be throwing your money down the drain.

I would highly recommend just getting a replacement donk, Nissan have built 1000's of these motors and I could pretty much put my hand on my heart and say they are the best at doing it. They may not be as strong as a forged motor but with the turbo and power you are after they will take any punishment you can throw at them! Building a motor yourself no matter what parts you use won't be a improvement it WILL be a step backwards.

I'm in Perth as well and have access to a very cheap NEO motor with low kms and not abused that would be perfect for what you need.

PM me if you are interested.

Cheers

Simon

yeah and you will still have to pay someone to torque the block with a torque plate and do the homing for you, then you'll have to measure everything VERY precisely to get the clearances right, checking weights etc, this isn't something you will get right with backyard tools especially the first time, my mate tried rebuilding gemini motors to get some practice (same idea as you) and they all either smoked from poor clearances or they rattled loose in a few weeks doing big ends etc, ok when you only spent $300 on a gemini motor, not ok when you spent $5k on brand name RB parts.

it sounds bad but I can almost guarantee you will butcher your first motor due to a simple mistake or poor tools

lol. im not building this motor for "bragging rights" im doing it because i feel im some what capable of handling the task and the learning experience. fyi my current engine is on 187,800km's, not too far off 200,000 probally been thrashed 90% of its life cause the syncro's are pretty much gone and its got mild piston slap when cold. also my "shed" happens to be a nissan workshop.

a 6 million dollar workshop recognised all over the country, with a floor scrubber that costs more then most peoples cars do!!!

yeah and you will still have to pay someone to torque the block with a torque plate and do the homing for you, then you'll have to measure everything VERY precisely to get the clearances right, checking weights etc, this isn't something you will get right with backyard tools especially the first time, my mate tried rebuilding gemini motors to get some practice (same idea as you) and they all either smoked from poor clearances or they rattled loose in a few weeks doing big ends etc, ok when you only spent $300 on a gemini motor, not ok when you spent $5k on brand name RB parts.

it sounds bad but I can almost guarantee you will butcher your first motor due to a simple mistake or poor tools

we'l see, im not taking this build lightly. im well aware that everything must be precise and i plan on taking my time on this motor insuring everything is 100% and every bolt is torqued to specification. keep in mind i dont require the motor just yet as my current engine seems happy enough at the moment despite the knock when cold, im sure it will last until the new motor is complete.

Measuring will be pretty minimal as i have all specifications and the main bearing grades are stamped on the bottom of the block, big end's on the rods and piston grades stamped on the top of the block. shouldnt be too much of a problem

Edited by XxNinjaxX

You require alot of experience inorder to hand hone with a drill. Its very easy to create tapers and incorrect cross hatch angles. For a quick roughen up after a glazed bore its okay. But it was a real art back in the day before automated machines.

I believe the latest machines are virtually totally computer controlled based off load sensors built into the head, it can build a graphic drawing of the bores shape and will automatically take out, out of round and tapered sections. You end up with a perfect bore, the exact cross hatch angle and almost no human involvement in the process. When its done you just check it for roudness and piston to bore clearance. I guess the less human interference there is, the less risk of stuff ups.

I think the first process was with some diamond cutting stones that machine the bore close to size, then finer stones for final finish then some nylon pads that give the plateau finish. Quite amazing but no doubt expensive.

You require alot of experience inorder to hand hone with a drill. Its very easy to create tapers and incorrect cross hatch angles. For a quick roughen up after a glazed bore its okay. But it was a real art back in the day before automated machines.

I believe the latest machines are virtually totally computer controlled based off load sensors built into the head, it can build a graphic drawing of the bores shape and will automatically take out, out of round and tapered sections. You end up with a perfect bore, the exact cross hatch angle and almost no human involvement in the process. When its done you just check it for roudness and piston to bore clearance. I guess the less human interference there is, the less risk of stuff ups.

I think the first process was with some diamond cutting stones that machine the bore close to size, then finer stones for final finish then some nylon pads that give the plateau finish. Quite amazing but no doubt expensive.

Ive seen a couple of those machines in action, impressive stuff, but yes very expensive.

But yeah, I wouldnt be trusting myself on a freshly bored bore with a hand help hone, unless it was just for a factory style freshen up. its very easy to take too much meat out of the bores and have crap clearances

yeah for 300ish bucks its not really worth doing it yourself.

Everything else I do though (deburring oil galleries/returns, cleaning the casting dags out of the ports etc)

real port work I would leave to professionals as its very easy to go backwards.

I would just pay the money for someone who can use a CNC style boring/honing machine along with torquing up the block correctly, too much guess work with a human I mean you want it to be better than stock don't you?

Yeh exactly. That is the best way.

Its amazing just how advanced some machinery is these days.

Soon enough it will be one machine that bores, hones and decks the block. Along with almost anything else you would need to do...The only process I couldnt see it doing would be tunnel boring.

They can CNC an entire engine block out of billet these days with those new 10 axis CNC machines so I am sure that is possible, not that you would do it because its so expensive but it can be done.

Edited by Rolls

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...