Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have just had issues with this importer myself!!

My thread

Hopefully this guy starts losing business!!

sorry to hear u having same drama as me with this dodgy seller, i have lodged a formal complaint with Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal and thereafter will take it to small claims tribunal if need be, if a satisfactory outcome is not achieved, i will at least ensure he loses x10 amount he ripped me off for by trying to make a quick buck.. keep up the pm n shame so at least others sau users arent a victim

Edited by BWRGTR
  • 5 months later...

small claims? lol just call your bank and lodge a dispute under Items not received as ordered.

if the bank says nah we cant give you your money threaten with "FOS" Financial Banking Ombudsman.

anything under $500.00 the Bank should get the Money Back.

...

Oh I forgot to mention I work for FOS.

its the quickest way to get your money back.

ohhhh my bad for bringin up a dead thread.

  • 1 month later...

small claims? lol just call your bank and lodge a dispute under Items not received as ordered.

if the bank says nah we cant give you your money threaten with "FOS" Financial Banking Ombudsman.

anything under $500.00 the Bank should get the Money Back.

...

Oh I forgot to mention I work for FOS.

its the quickest way to get your money back.

ohhhh my bad for bringin up a dead thread.

Might be an Old thread, but thats a GREAT bit of advice man!

  • 2 weeks later...

This guy offering you $50 to call it even is about as close as you'll get to an admission of guilt from him I think. He's basically trying to bribe you with $50 so that you'll forget about the $420 he ripped you off. Did he think this one through properly before making such a ridiculous offer? How could he on any reasonable grounds be only $50 responsible for something which cost over $400 all told? If he honestly didn't think he did anything wrong he wouldn't (and shouldn't) have offered you a token $50 refund. This guy knows he's done something wrong and is trying to cheap his way out.

This guy offering you $50 to call it even is about as close as you'll get to an admission of guilt from him I think. He's basically trying to bribe you with $50 so that you'll forget about the $420 he ripped you off. Did he think this one through properly before making such a ridiculous offer? How could he on any reasonable grounds be only $50 responsible for something which cost over $400 all told? If he honestly didn't think he did anything wrong he wouldn't (and shouldn't) have offered you a token $50 refund. This guy knows he's done something wrong and is trying to cheap his way out.

if this is the case dont accept that offer from the merchant. it give the bank and the financial ombudsman service no right to pursue the matter as it was technically handled directly with the merchant in agreement of settlement.

may help in a situation like that

if this is the case dont accept that offer from the merchant. it give the bank and the financial ombudsman service no right to pursue the matter as it was technically handled directly with the merchant in agreement of settlement.

may help in a situation like that

is that for all states FOS ?

small claims? lol just call your bank and lodge a dispute under Items not received as ordered.

if the bank says nah we cant give you your money threaten with "FOS" Financial Banking Ombudsman.

anything under $500.00 the Bank should get the Money Back.

...

Oh I forgot to mention I work for FOS.

its the quickest way to get your money back.

ohhhh my bad for bringin up a dead thread.

is there a timeframe for the claim to be made? the small claims i lodged was with victoria office as the trader is vic based only to be told later, i will have more luck lodging in nsw (where i was living).. i didnt bother as it looked like i would be going around in a circle

This guy offering you $50 to call it even is about as close as you'll get to an admission of guilt from him I think. He's basically trying to bribe you with $50 so that you'll forget about the $420 he ripped you off. Did he think this one through properly before making such a ridiculous offer? How could he on any reasonable grounds be only $50 responsible for something which cost over $400 all told? If he honestly didn't think he did anything wrong he wouldn't (and shouldn't) have offered you a token $50 refund. This guy knows he's done something wrong and is trying to cheap his way out.

yeah, he even offered to give me a good price if i bought more stuff from him in the future, what sort of idiot will do that? as it stands, i still have the panel sitting somewhere as it looked shit when fitted.. he is a trader on sau so i posted on all his thread to warn others who may look at dealing with him and pm'd other members who posted in the thread.. its gonna cost him more than what he ripped me off for in lost business and ill make sure of that.. if it was an individual who ripped me off and not a business, i would chaulk it down to bad call, however i was dealing with a business (even a trader on here) and it had a business policy covering refund/returns, which at the end of the day was worth jack shit

if this is the case dont accept that offer from the merchant. it give the bank and the financial ombudsman service no right to pursue the matter as it was technically handled directly with the merchant in agreement of settlement.

may help in a situation like that

nope did not accept the $50 offer, pretty much told him to shove it up his ass

  • 2 weeks later...

is there a timeframe for the claim to be made? the small claims i lodged was with victoria office as the trader is vic based only to be told later, i will have more luck lodging in nsw (where i was living).. i didnt bother as it looked like i would be going around in a circle

nope did not accept the $50 offer, pretty much told him to shove it up his ass

not really a time frame. with internal bank disputes you have 60 days to make the claim. any disputes lodged after that will be declined. we have people making complaints through FOS for situations that have happened years ago, but keep in mind, those situations are generally large ones..

yeh good. mate PM Me i'll try and give you some help..

Im interested to hear how this is worked out. Cant stand dodgey bastards deliberatly ripping off people and getting away with it. Especially when they are a trader on our site

chances are if the bank resolves it, the "dodgey bastard" will still get away with it.. funds will just be reimbursed by the bank itself. it sucks i know but at least the OP is no longer out of pocket

  • 1 month later...

this has given me something to think about, i know that dodgy things can happen on eBay, but the way this has been worded, has given me a reminder of when i bought some items off a guy, i went away and asked the misses to keep the payments going each time, she forgot to do so, and as such came back to a some what angry message from the guy, but as the money had not been payed and just sat in the bank, i was able to do the remainder of the payment to him to which he was happy, but i could clearly see that to him i was doing the dodgy to him in a way.

  • 2 weeks later...

Mate, shoot me the business name of this cretin so I can be certain I won't do any business with him, and can advise mates likewise. He owes a replacement or refund. No question. You can also lodge a complaint with fair trading in Vic, and possibly even NSW. If he runs a business he has to follow the law. This would probably even fall under the trade Practices Act for misleading a customer if he has lied at all, like saying you aren't entitled to a refund or replacement, and possibly even shown a pic of the item in good nick and then sending on as damaged.

Keep on his back, and claim any extra costs as well if it comes to it. I've just had a major win over my insurance company in ACT for a rental house I have there. Storm damaged roof - hail 18 months before my current claim and they fixed it and said they would have the entire tile roof checked to ensure it was fine. Then wind storm lifted ridge cap in the current claim and they said it was due to poor maintenance. They then lied that they had a report from the roofer that said the roof was in perfect condition after the hail repair. It was BS of course as my tenant, a contract painter said the only attention they paid was to the hail damaged areas and they left, no detailed checks. I demanded the document and any others relating to that repair under Right to Information (FOI) and advised that I would have the mortar tested at a NATA test facility as the house is only 13 years old, not the 25 they alleged. I had the house built btw. So after screwing around for many months now and failing to produce the report they have folded and asked for the repair invoice to pay me. Of course they said another builder inspected the roof who said it could be due to previous hail damage, not poor maintenance so they have to cover it. I don't care that they have to pretend someone else screwed up, as long as they meet their obligation.

BTW, Tiles are shit roofing material. Colorbond all the way. Stinkin' southern builders have quoted 20K extra to do colorbond on one house I built so they didn't have to do it, yet up here in Gods country tiles cost more. Go figure that out.

Stay on his ass brother.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...