Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • chaos

    7164

  • Ska

    5791

  • BelGarion

    3645

  • Nexus9

    3590

Top Posters In This Topic

First, there are some serious challenges facing this process, Mr Smoothline The first one, in our view, is the fear factor. SAU negotiations and Constituants rights are extremely sensitive issues. A referendum that relates to such issues is fraught with the danger that it could act as a lightning rod for unjustified animosity and negativity toward SAUl people who are trying to resolve the issue surrounding their status as Queenslanders. This concern alone presents a great challenge to government. They must consider only questions that will not foment discontent and fear.

What is our position on the question? Given the above, the SAU Chamber of Commerce believes that the only questions that could be valid for a referendum are those surrounding the issues of process. Even then, the questions would have to be so broad as to provide only the most general of guidelines for government. We, in fact, can see only one real question that can give government strong guidance from the public, and that question would simply be: is the process working?

smoothline as you can see I've copped a hiding for fighting with noobs.

Apart from that i've been good. We really have to get a group photo of everyone sometime just for the memories.

I'm also thinking of the sticker on Smooth's car. "I'm fast, I'm safe, I'm smooth" So disturbing looking at that picture.

Having gone through some of the legal discussions over what finality and certainty mean, I understand that point. If we are looking, as we are, to get guidance from SAU Heirachy on basic principles, not the details in terms of the basic principles — I think everybody understands that in negotiations details are as details become — would you not agree that finality and certainty are concepts that people understand in regular language?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I can see between the water jacket and cyl 3 there wasn't a hard line of combustion gas. It certainly appears that the issue is coming from there. Yes, checked the tension. All at 100ft lbs where I set them 5 years ago. These blocks can crack but generally when they have been over bored. Mine is only 0.5mm oversize at 89.5mm. They break between cylinders around the 91mm mark. No sign of that with mine. My gut feeling is the head gasket lifted a while back when the studs stretched and i bandaided it by retorquing the studs. It's finally let go.
    • My Nismo 1.5 churps a bit on reverse turns when cold, but besides that feels like a stock diff.
    • Yes, but, I paid cash and I'm pretty sure the receipt was in the bin 10 minutes after I got home Note to self, keep all receipts
    • Bunnings would have just handed you your money back on that one!
    • So, version 4 intake is on its way I was looking at these a while ago but at around $200 or more it was a little pricey for something that might not work, but, I had it in my watch list, but, I got a message saying it was on special, and I had a code thingie to use, it eventually came in at $120 delivered, so BAM, BUY NOW.....LOL I'll need to have a look when it arrives but I feel it will "look" better than what I currently have, as it comes with a PCV fitting, so I will be able to get rid of the alloy pipe that goes to the throttle body with the PCV fitting  Well, that's what the voices in my head are telling me  Oh, and this happened today Yeap, it was a Trojan, and it was cheap, so I headed back to the hardware store and actually spent a little bit more on a heavy duty,  one that was actually recommended by a plumber mate, a Cyclone one with a fibreglass handle that is actually rated for clay The broken shovel will eventually be "modified" into a short handle shovel
×
×
  • Create New...