Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

we have a stock rb25 with a holset hc1 at 18 psi makeing 402whp on a dynojet

we re looking for anyone that has 400+ hp to share info with us

-hopefully we can find alot

we re planing to push ours harder but slowly -each time we up the boost i ll post the video

here s videos of ours

this is on e85 and methanol injection

1000cc and walbro 255lph hp

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

find info out about what exactly?

plenty of people have made near on 400rwhp on stock motors. and that's without E85 & meth.

all that info is easily accessible with the search or reading the dyno thread.

honestly taking into account E85 AND meth, your result is poor.

18psi at 5200, thats one laggy turbo...400rwhp although its good it aint huge hp. I know of cars making high 400's on E85 with full boost at 3800rpm (running low 20's psi). Either way keep us all informed it will be interesting to see it at mid to high 20 psi what power it produces.

Yeah, 5200 is no surprise.

The HC1 is an old horse Cummins truck turbo. There were two sizes... I'm assuming its the larger given how bad the response is on E85, which means its capable of around 450-500rwhp going off some US results...

it doesn't appear they were using any special fuels either (85 or meth)

find info out about what exactly?

plenty of people have made near on 400rwhp on stock motors. and that's without E85 & meth.

all that info is easily accessible with the search or reading the dyno thread.

honestly taking into account E85 AND meth, your result is poor.

i did some research but found it on dynopacks and dynodynamics

we live in fresno ca which is central california(usa)

there s no one withthin 200 miles from here with a high hp rb motor

most r all heresay

-and a dynopack reads 22+% higher than our dynojet

find info out about what exactly?

plenty of people have made near on 400rwhp on stock motors. and that's without E85 & meth.

all that info is easily accessible with the search or reading the dyno thread.

honestly taking into account E85 AND meth, your result is poor.

that s what i said

compare this power to our hondas it s a over price pig...

we have test motors with honda making 100whp per cylinder

-i think it should at least handle 550whp...

400rwHP.... That is roughly every second skyline on this forum. It seems that your turbo leaves you sinking in no mans land.

Two threads for you to read:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Pr...html&st=100

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/40...html&st=360

Those threads are about cars making 500+WHP on E85. Specifically look at the PT5557 results on E85 on a stock SR20, 500+WHP.

The PT thread has all the proof you will need. End.

that s what i said

compare this power to our hondas it s a over price pig...

we have test motors with honda making 100whp per cylinder

-i think it should at least handle 550whp...

Theres a guy on here username 180or200 thats making 580rwhp on an unopened RB25 on E85. He has been making that for a couple of years so 550rwhp is definately achieveable with the right tune and mods. He's using a Garret 3582 .8 rear with high 20psi boost.

Good luck with it all and keep us informed.

400rwHP.... That is roughly every second skyline on this forum. It seems that your turbo leaves you sinking in no mans land.

Two threads for you to read:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Pr...html&st=100

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/40...html&st=360

Those threads are about cars making 500+WHP on E85. Specifically look at the PT5557 results on E85 on a stock SR20, 500+WHP.

The PT thread has all the proof you will need. End.

The link to the 400rwkw thread is not really applicable, they are all built motors.

Just Nistune ECU with 800cc injectors. It was noisy and rough, had broken ring lands on 3 pistons and chewed out valves due to float. Should really run forgied pistions and stronger valve springs to do any thing like that. and its 431rwHP instead of 428 lol.

Just Nistune ECU with 800cc injectors. It was noisy and rough, had broken ring lands on 3 pistons and chewed out valves due to float. Should really run forgied pistions and stronger valve springs to do any thing like that. and its 431rwHP instead of 428 lol.

how high did u rev to float the valve springs?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...