Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ohhh me too! The line is very blurry for me between what consitutes a Pro Class and vice versa.

Another option would be too cut the number of sessions for the pro guys and increase the sessions for the open and clubman cars.

Its obvious the pro cars cant utilise all the time they are given but the other guys would relish more track time.

Who is Jamie Coote?

It's Murray's car, Josh is his son, and they had the young Kiwi fella Earl Bamber driving, who, by all accounts is the next big thing if given half a chance and super easy to get along with and mega quick.

I want to see the hammerhead at Lakeside! JapNats is coming...

Edited by hrd-hr30

I want to see the hammerhead at Lakeside! JapNats is coming...

It would be awesome! :)

And Harry, that car was originally going to be Marray's new gravel rally car, but he got a little excited about this Time Attack thing and it kind of changed course. haha

Who is Jamie Coote?

It's Murray's car, Josh is his son, and they had the young Kiwi fella Earl Bamber driving, who, by all accounts is the next big thing if given half a chance and super easy to get along with and mega quick.

hmm, sorry I thought it was josh's car (too many knocks had me calling him jamie not josh. sorry).

and yeah earl drove the wheels off it. all round awesome effort on what I imagine was not a massive budget, just lots of know how.

I want to see the hammerhead at Lakeside! JapNats is coming...

Unless its sprints you might get protests from other competitors having to run door to door with blades sticking half a metre out of each side of the car.

because they're not semi slicks.

If a tyre is DOT certified doesn't that make it road legal somewhere in the world; thus a semi? (serious question not a sacastic remark)

If you're going to the extremes of saying that even they're if DOT approved it's not a 'true' semi, I would raise what is the point of these ultra ultra soft 1 lap qualifying wonder tyres, except as a supplier you're going to get more people buying more of them to be competitive ... /sarcasm

Point is that the big boys are most likely going to have some sponsorship with tyres so the relevance is lost in out-right times. It's more so in the Open Class, where by 'joe citizen' is likely to gain better times with more track lapping (especially the Interstaters without local track knowledge) with a DOT R6 or Z214 as they are a more consistent tyre which are more readily available in the different sizes required by non off the shelf circuit sprint cars. This is compared to the way it currently is with he/she who has the most money to throw new uber tyres at their car each session (on top of their car build) will more than likely go quicker, just by virtue of always having better grip.

Maybe another Class between Open/Club would be good with the driver limitations of Clubsprint, to help separate the larger budgets of the "Pro Class" Open Teams with the backyarders that want to run non-road tyres. The separation of Workshop Class from the Privateers in their own cars could be just in the Classification of the Results, ie still running them in the same manner, just that the abilities of those punching above their weight would be very clear and would encourage more people to look at Open Privateer. Likewise push more of the "Open Workshop" Teams into Pro and run more Pro Grouped Sessions with less time, as currently they are not utilising all the time they currently have available.

The organisers have a year to make their decisions on next year (which I'm sure they'll be doing) and they have to make decisions that are best for the event and their sponsors, which is critical for the event to run rather than getting person X or Y to compete.

If a tyre is DOT certified doesn't that make it road legal somewhere in the world; thus a semi? (serious question not a sacastic remark)

If you're going to the extremes of saying that even they're if DOT approved it's not a 'true' semi, I would raise what is the point of these ultra ultra soft 1 lap qualifying wonder tyres, except as a supplier you're going to get more people buying more of them to be competitive ... /sarcasm

Point is that the big boys are most likely going to have some sponsorship with tyres so the relevance is lost in out-right times. It's more so in the Open Class, where by 'joe citizen' is likely to gain better times with more track lapping (especially the Interstaters without local track knowledge) with a DOT R6 or Z214 as they are a more consistent tyre which are more readily available in the different sizes required by non off the shelf circuit sprint cars. This is compared to the way it currently is with he/she who has the most money to throw new uber tyres at their car each session (on top of their car build) will more than likely go quicker, just by virtue of always having better grip.

Maybe another Class between Open/Club would be good with the driver limitations of Clubsprint, to help separate the larger budgets of the "Pro Class" Open Teams with the backyarders that want to run non-road tyres. The separation of Workshop Class from the Privateers in their own cars could be just in the Classification of the Results, ie still running them in the same manner, just that the abilities of those punching above their weight would be very clear and would encourage more people to look at Open Privateer. Likewise push more of the "Open Workshop" Teams into Pro and run more Pro Grouped Sessions with less time, as currently they are not utilising all the time they currently have available.

The organisers have a year to make their decisions on next year (which I'm sure they'll be doing) and they have to make decisions that are best for the event and their sponsors, which is critical for the event to run rather than getting person X or Y to compete.

The tyres that the "big boys" are using are exactly what you and I can buy off the shelf. They're not specials, or super-duper softs, they just used in a way that makes them wear very quickly, ie, no running in, heat cycling, or love. They're simply fitted, lightly warmed, pressures corrected, then raped. One, maybe two laps, and they're past their best.

Yes, fastest to use the whole track and make the track as long as possible, keeps momentum going.

Also about the discussion comparing Superlap car times to V8 Superstars and GT3's, not sure if mentioned on this thread but these cars run on slicks, which are much better, and at least a second faster. Plus if these Jap cars ran on V8 Superstar budget and had top level V8 Supercar driver they would all be faster. Cyber's 1.28.8 is amazing and Eastern Creek tin top record, imagine on slicks and local track knowledge, gun driver?

John your time was awesome mate for an un-tested car. in open you would have got 2nd place which is a pretty good measure of the car! Much respect for having the balls to put the car in Pro class (which is fair since it's a workshop owned car) but we know you don't have the resources or sponsor dollars of some of the pro guys. but the line is pretty blurred between pro and open anyway.

1:35 for the car debut with a completely new set-up is very good going.

yeah I agree. with a V8SC budget we could all go faster but not sure the driver is giving much away. I watched a few of the cyber in-car laps with their data engineer (including the 1:28) and got to say he is not lacking for talent which is amazing considering how few laps he's done at EC. he has a few little tricks in that cyber car that help get it moving fast.

Check out a video of our fastest lap on youtube, 1:35:23.

great lap so smooth and precise, not an easy task in a heavy, powerful RWD

just watching the Scorch video back to back with this you can see where the time is... the S15 just looks that much lighter, harder and peakier in its setup... almost like a GT1 car... if you could get some more weight out of the 300zx you'd be right up there I reckon

congrats JP - awesome time from the big slot car! Its great to see things like the Z32 out there that aren't the first or most obvious choice for the basis of a Time Attack car doing so well. Lap looked great too - surprisingly smooth.

And a big congrats to Mark in his R35 too - how good is this???

11 12 Mark Hansen Mercury Motorsport Nissan R35 GTR PRO S2 1:33.5560

12 12 Tarzan Yamada Mercury Motorsport Nissan R35 GTR PRO S1 1:34.3370

Edited by hrd-hr30

Mark clarified elsewhere that transponders were fluffed about Harry. Mark did a 36 from memory, still nothing to sneeze at, and I bet he's looking forward to spending more time in it and getting his head around downforce....... not a natural feeling I guess! :)

because they're not semi slicks.

cool vid from the Scorch Racing S15. Note the G meter... seems better in right handers - not ideal for an anti clockwise track. Also did its fast time on the second flying lap.

Notice his boost reading is blurred out too..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...