Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Great work...do the before and after graphs use the same ramp rates etc as the power curve with the cams seems to do a bit of darting around at the start and plays catch up to the std cam curve. Not doubting the result, as the cams do seem to make comfortably more grunt, just trying to understand if the cams actually allow comfortably more grunt at 3,000 & 3,500rpm which seems real surprising

Wow T67 and 3076 are pretty mirrored power wise but the T67 makes more torque, very interesting. Is the T67 something you could use in a street car? Or to laggy? The TD06 be better? I had sold my self on a TD06 but thinking T67 now for more potential in the future.

Great work...do the before and after graphs use the same ramp rates etc as the power curve with the cams seems to do a bit of darting around at the start and plays catch up to the std cam curve. Not doubting the result, as the cams do seem to make comfortably more grunt, just trying to understand if the cams actually allow comfortably more grunt at 3,000 & 3,500rpm which seems real surprising

Same ramp rate. Probably different start RPM but if anything the standard cam curve should have an advantage. It's all fair and reasonable testing, we were all surprised how well it all worked.

Boost was on heaps earlier so there was a fair bit more boost between 3000-3500rpm which helps make the extra grunt.

Same ramp rate. Probably different start RPM but if anything the standard cam curve should have an advantage. It's all fair and reasonable testing, we were all surprised how well it all worked.

Boost was on heaps earlier so there was a fair bit more boost between 3000-3500rpm which helps make the extra grunt.

:thumbsup: Oh well, lets hope Tomei have done their homework with the Poncams on the Rb20. I am not expecting anything near your result as franly I will be amazed if the 20G can flow any more then the 306rwkws its currently flowing

Wow T67 and 3076 are pretty mirrored power wise but the T67 makes more torque, very interesting. Is the T67 something you could use in a street car? Or to laggy? The TD06 be better? I had sold my self on a TD06 but thinking T67 now for more potential in the future.

looks like the t67 would be just like the 3076 on the street , until about 3500rpm where the 67 walks away by 25~ hp :P . That sort of power in a little rwd 32 would be a handful at the best of times! 120klm/h in 5th gear would get interesting real quick!

Lol i don't intend to run a high comp motor much longer, so knowing 8cm works well on an SR means I'd rather chase the response

Status can feel free to comment now lol

Other options are 3071, 3040 and FP3073 in no particular order. FP is 2 grand worth, the others id aim to buy used under a grand or kando it

so whats goin on with the motor..?

Doing a quick rebuild on my DET. Luckily the person I sold it to determined it was to far for for his looking and brought it back.

Basic built etc. Haven't you seen FB?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I’m here solo don’t have any hands to help so haven’t hit it with a timing light 
    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
×
×
  • Create New...