Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yes. If you do a direct comparison on a Turbo with and without antisurge. The antisurge will have less boost response and less power all over. Because a percentage of air is always going though the antisurge slots bypassing the optimum point where the air should be going (tips of the inducer on the wheel) instead its entering from the sides.

Do you know how a spray gun works? The air flowing past the slot should promote more air to be pulled into the compressor from the surge slot using a venturi effect, this would only work up to a certain pressure obviously where the air would flow back the other way.

I would like to smoke test the front of one while its strapped down the the dyno, you should be able to see the air being sucked into the surge slots not blowing out. Perhaps someone with a map sensored car can do it for us?

Do you know how a spray gun works? The air flowing past the slot should promote more air to be pulled into the compressor from the surge slot using a venturi effect, this would only work up to a certain pressure obviously where the air would flow back the other way.

I would like to smoke test the front of one while its strapped down the the dyno, you should be able to see the air being sucked into the surge slots not blowing out. Perhaps someone with a map sensored car can do it for us?

The air flowing past the slot would create a vacuum in the slot and thus pull air out of the turbo blades...

Scotty not sure if your agreeing with me or not or if that comment was meant for me. But that's exactly what I'm saying, the slots will we sucking in air the whole time to Turbo isn't surging. And will spit out surging air then recirculate it back to the compressor.

I'm thinking of going the oil only 20g, mirror copy of the trust item.

Can anyone give me a reasonable against argument to make me buy the water and oil item? As ive now got a 6boost to hang the thing off, i just want less clutter and less bolts that need to be turned over and over when removing/refitting the thing and obviously less cost in getting 4AN hoses in the right length for the water.

Can anyone sway me as to why I shouldnt get the oil only item? NB all the T67s we see are oil only, while the usual 20g items are oil and water.

FYI kando also make their oil only CHRA with a smaller hub centre on the wheel and advertise it as increased flow. Does anyone want to say NAO to that? I fear larger surface area may mean slower spool. My intention is widest powerband and 270-300kw.

Can anyone explain why on the kando ebay store it says that the td07/t67 is supposed to be for a 1.8L to 3L engine

when the smaller (i think) td06 is ment for a minimum 2.5L?

I'm planning on getting a td05 or td06 for my rb20 in the near future but if the td07 is ment for smaller application i might consider it.

Robert thats not really how it works.

Please look up the member Roy and study his setup. For a long time he had a staple TD06 20G 8cm highmount RB20, hes now done a bit more like E85 and a plazmaman plenum and has hit the magic 300 mark.

First pick your power goals and then pick your turbo to suit. Kando now give the option of T3 external gate TD05H's which I think would be a good thing on the RB20.

First pick your power goals and then pick your turbo to suit. Kando now give the option of T3 external gate TD05H's which I think would be a good thing on the RB20.

yeah this is the turbo I'm pretty set on as it will give good power and still have decent response, I know the td06's are ment to be monsters but on the 20 the lag will just be to annoying for the street.

yeah this is the turbo I'm pretty set on as it will give good power and still have decent response, I know the td06's are ment to be monsters but on the 20 the lag will just be to annoying for the street.

For a solid 240kw I would say this should hit the spot:

http://www.ebay.com....=item4165d4ffdc

plus

http://www.ebay.com....=item416678841f

Get a gate plumbed off the rear housing and hang it off the stock manifold. Beauty!

i was thinking this...but i would prefer a 3" inlet?

http://www.ebay.com....#ht_2574wt_1270

but i should fully read stuff first, your post basically gave be the best of both worlds :P

cheers mate ;)

Edited by RBert

The one I posted is the exact same turbo, except it has a 3" inlet and Ive posted the CHRA and housing separate (just because they didnt have a 3" one listed in one piece).

Realistically it doesnt matter if u get the 3" or the 2.4"...... But if u go the 2.4" ull be able to use the stock intake pipe for teh epic stealth ;) just need to make a heatshield to cover the gate.

Re your 6boost idea... a twin scroll 6boost is epic........... WHEN USED WITH A TWIN SCROLL TURBO lol. The kando range are not twin scroll, so it will do you no justice. if you want to get a twin scroll and highmount the turbo that is also a good idea, but adds another 1200+ of expense when you could get a similar result from the stock manifold and be very stealth. Imagine ripping people at the drags and looking like your running something pretty ordinary, dickkk scchhhhwwwiing.

If I had an RB20 powered car I would probably do the exact setup we are talking about. Stock manifolds, TD05H 18G with a gate off the housing. Stealthed up and stock position. Like I said 230-240kw and it would be pretty responsive/solid. Ive recently done a TD05H 18G SR20DE and that is a weapon. Faster than a 260rwkw 3076R SR20DET (both S13s).

Get the housing nice an hot, bake it in the oven or BBQ, I think Scott just used a blow torch to heat up mine. The cool it slow bury it in sand or something, I'm sure Scott will fill you in soon anyway..

In other news, where's that 300kw club :whistling:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...