Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the way i worked it out was its probably revving to about 7000, maybe a bit less like most ppl do...

the graph doesnt show RPM but it does show rod speed.. so if 180kmh is close to 7000, 90kmh is close to 3500.

its a few rpm off but close enough, boost is definitely well and truly on before 4000. a good achievement.

no way 3500 is 90km :no:

Anyway out of curiosity and boredom I just laid my dyno sheet next to battery's..

Im sure many of you have done this already.. but im posting it.. :D

Not alot in it really, they are running almost identical boost , I have a fair bit more midrange torque and an extra 20kws at 5k, but nose over after 6k where they are both pulling 300kws,

Then he keeps pulling past 7 and smashes me..

Just remembering though I have alot less mods under the bonnet <<read excuse for losing... :Pbatterydynosheet.jpgtune300.jpg

Im not gunna bother comparing anything to Simons freak of nature....

well know how many revs it is if we know where the run ends.. speed and RPM are always relative. you will do double the speed at double the revs in the same gear etc.

nice comparo too :) i cant wait to pop a 20G on my SR

Aaww don't be sad Simon you know your my hero.

Its more the fact I can't be bothered converting all your dynosheet figures to something legible. :laugh:

I think u were making the same as me at 5Ooorpm

On low boost mine is about the same as yours at 5000rpm, high boost close to 30kw more

You guys need to screw more boost in... 2bar or bust :)

Edited by SimonR32

Yeah you can see my 20g making more on the green line but that was 21.5 psi which is 4psi more than the blue line and the gains were insignificant..As Roy said the little comp just can't push any harder ,its giving all she can give..especially on my setup..If I get a better manifold and plazmaman plenum and better cooler it could possibly push for a little more.. But looking at the comparison I would sooner just get a T67 than push this any further.

Not sure why battery didn't push more in..

Got a scanner Artz? I think I could use my broken ass Photoshop skills to overlay onto the same image..

Just re did all my cooler piping in 2.5"(was a mix of 2.25/2.5" before) and now i'm thinking maybe I should move to a bigger Throttle body, not sure if there is much point cause the stock one is still bigger than the 2.5" piping ??

Haha I was putting mine over a picture of yours on the computer, I was gunna trace it but gave up..its almost identical though with yours just dipping a Little between 4-6rpm

That's the same size as my cooler piping I guess there is hope for it yet :D

Got my T67 today and have a few questions.

It came with a 4" Anti surge compressor housing which i did not want i wanted a standard 4" Compressor housing. Will this matter that much?

What is the best way to block the water lines? The shorter of the 2 (Water return??) I was simply going to find a bolt wth the same pattern but shorter and bolt it in nice and tight with a coper washer.

Not sure what to do with the one that goes around the back of the block should i just cut it off shorter and fix a blocked off bit of hose on the other side? Or blank it off at the source, which im guessing is under the plenum?

Any help is appriciated keen to get her back together, tonight i have connected oil feed(One supplied with the turbo is a bit long) and return. Finished replacing exhaust manifold studds.

Also I have one of those NZ manifolds and i am not happy with the way the wastegate pipe comes out it is really really close to the body and air con lines.

Should i modify this pipe or just blank it off and run the gate off the turbin housing?

Also I have one of those NZ manifolds and i am not happy with the way the wastegate pipe comes out it is really really close to the body and air con lines.

Should i modify this pipe or just blank it off and run the gate off the turbin housing?

is this one of the mild steel ones from ebay? i was pretty keen to get one of these for my rb20 anymore negatives?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...