Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Ppls,

Previously I thought the extra throttle body type device was a traction control thing which shut when wheelspin was evident.

I have since been told that this is actually a Variable Intake Flow thingo which acts to increase airflow speed at low rpm by closing like a normal throttle body, and then opening up at high rpm to give bulk airflow.

Now, PowerFCs are suppose to control all features of the engine management, and I would assume that this is a very important part of the Neo 6 engine.

To those who know, does the R-34 PowerFC allow you to control the activity of this throttle body device........??

I would assume that you could adjust this similar to the way you can with the NVCS.

Having said that though, it might have a link to TPS in order to give the best results depending on a lot of other variables......

Anybody with any experience??

Cheers

BASS OUT

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34851-r34-neo-straight-6-power-fc-question/
Share on other sites

Are you talking about the bit that sits across the inside of the plenum? it's open at low revs, then closes at high revs...speeds up the flow of air at high RPM. If you disconnect it you'll notice the car runs like a dog from about 3200-5000ish,then picks up in the last bit of the range.

Yep, that's the bit.

Any definent answers??

when I disconnected the plug to it last night, the Engine Warning light came and on the Slip/TCS off light lit up and I took it for a drive.

I didn't really notice a lot of difference but the car was cold and I couldn't really give it a good thrashing.

Guest RedLineGTR

The thing that is in front of the throttle body, is for the Traction Control System :D its what limits your revs when u are wheels spinning from the line, hence if you try to launch with the TCS on then you bog down quite bad. Hope it answers you question.

Guest RedLineGTR

The Power Fc will control everything the same as in other skylines (in one way or another) the Neo engine is tuned for more power (more R&D) over the past models. The TCS Has a Seperate ECU for what it does and u cant change any items of how it behaves with the power fc nor do i know any companys that have Tuned it in one way or another.

Guest RedLineGTR

I hope this is what u mean by your question. When the TCS is activated it is activated and if the car starts to slip highly then it kicks in just like i throttle body, like if you are on the pedal to the floor the TCS can ajust its throttle and limit your revs. If the system is off then the air flows how its meant to without any interuption.

My experience with the traction control is as follows.

Going around slight corners and nailing it, the car will pull lose power and then accelerate once grip is gained again.

But in the wet the car will drop spark and the engine will 'strobe' (for want of a better word) for a second and then accelerate, at which point traction will be lost again, and then it will strobe again.

I think maybe in moderate losses of traction, the blade might close, butin big ones it drops sparky and really pulles the reigns in.

If it only works for traction control, I wonder it there is any merit in using it as a variable intake diameter type device????

What makes you think it "drops sparky"? It just closes the valve completely starving the engine of air and probably cuts the fuel at the same time. If you cut spark it would backfire when you gave it back.

At it's most basic it just cuts power so you can get traction back and if you keep your foot down then it will spin the wheels again, thus restarting the whole process.

Abo Bob.

The sound it makes it identical to the sound that my car makes when misfiring on plugs that haven't been gapped properly.

That's why i made the assumption.

But I have been wrong before!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...