Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Could be a positive that the issue started when the car wasnt being driven hard, if somethings gone maybe it hasnt had a chance to do much damage.

Go for a highish comp 3.0 that will be super responsive and wont need lots of boost and the small turbo should be fine.

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It may as well be a different country as the vehicle legalities between QLD and VIC are completely different.

This is one of the things that cops will pick on and can mean the difference between being on your way and a defect which could find more things. And even possibly the deadly VASS!!

Could be a positive that the issue started when the car wasnt being driven hard, if somethings gone maybe it hasnt had a chance to do much damage.

Go for a highish comp 3.0 that will be super responsive and wont need lots of boost and the small turbo should be fine.

Why highish comp?

I would have thought a 2835ProS will spool up happily regardless.

A stock 30 bottom end would be cheap and do the job by my internet/keyboard warrior reckoning.

There are 2x types of return flow coolers. One has massive end tanks with the core sitting vertically while the other type has 2x small end tanks one side and 1x large end tank on another with the core sitting horizontally.

I would recommend the 2nd type which is 2x smaller coolers joint together giving greater overall length. In theory is more efficient in heat lose.

Why highish comp?

I would have thought a 2835ProS will spool up happily regardless.

A stock 30 bottom end would be cheap and do the job by my internet/keyboard warrior reckoning.

Highish comp as then less boost pressure and airflow is required to make nice power and it will be more responsive off boost. Same as how low compression requires more boost pressure and quite often a larger turbo to make the same power.

The 2835 Pro S will spool up fine as is but why not make it better if only 300rwkw is the goal.

I agree a stock 30 bottom would be fine but I dont think joey will be using a stock engine and if hes building you may as well build it the way you want it.

My mate had a turbocharged V6 with a 3082 turbo. With the factory engine of compression 9.2 the car was fantastic, super responsive and pulled very well, however when he blew the factory engine he rebuilt it for low compression ~8.5 and the car took longer to spool and lost some of its pull. It really needed a larger GT35 turbo to overcome the low compression and make good power but he got over spending money on it so left the GT30 on there. He would have been better off leaving the compression at 9.2 or even raising to say 9.5. It seems to be a good way to make good response and power with a smaller turbo.

yeh, it's possible to get a defect, EPA and VASS in the same adventure which would mean a HELL of a lot of tears, sweat and $

or f**k it gut it and track it... :P

Sorry to hear bout ya car Joe new slugs and a bearing kit she'll b right mate..Or yeah, Go crazy..

Hears a cool big end bearing story for ya..

Did it on the way homefrom a scoot down the franga freeway, driving home and she just goes clunk clunk clunk clunk clunk, makes it home where i parked it and fgured id deal with it in the morning.

So next morning a mate had dropped around to have a geezer at my busted vehicle..He was big into wearing white at the time too, white pants, white shoes, white shirt, bleached blonde hair, ya know how it is..

Anyways i pop the bonnet and hes looking as i cranked it went clunk clunk clunk again but not fire, so i tried again, next thing i see a fountain of oil and him stand up from looking under the bonnet dripped in oil from head to toe, I cracked up laughing of course..

Turns out a blockage somewhere (probably bits of bearing i guess) had split the filter open at the exact moment he stuck his head under there and spewed oil right into his face all over his nice whites and all over the road :blush: .

Edited by Arthur T3

Highish comp as then less boost pressure and airflow is required to make nice power and it will be more responsive off boost. Same as how low compression requires more boost pressure and quite often a larger turbo to make the same power.

The 2835 Pro S will spool up fine as is but why not make it better if only 300rwkw is the goal.

I agree a stock 30 bottom would be fine but I dont think joey will be using a stock engine and if hes building you may as well build it the way you want it.

My mate had a turbocharged V6 with a 3082 turbo. With the factory engine of compression 9.2 the car was fantastic, super responsive and pulled very well, however when he blew the factory engine he rebuilt it for low compression ~8.5 and the car took longer to spool and lost some of its pull. It really needed a larger GT35 turbo to overcome the low compression and make good power but he got over spending money on it so left the GT30 on there. He would have been better off leaving the compression at 9.2 or even raising to say 9.5. It seems to be a good way to make good response and power with a smaller turbo.

Obviously a higher comp engine will be more responsive, never get an argument from me on that front. Price of using a stock 30 bottom end might be a reason to go this way, after all RIPS can't have it all wrong.

I would argue your friend needed a smaller turbo to make some airflow down low to compensate for the lower compression. Going to a larger turbo (albeit larger turbine in your example) surely would have made it doggier down low.

why is everyone pushing for another monster engine build when its all been done before, he has a near perfect setup already ,just needs a new bearing or something, id consider some better pistons maybe even consider some slightly racier cams but probably wouldnt bother,just fix whats broke and get back to driving it..

PS..return flows are pox, build something ridiculous like mine :P

Edited by Arthur T3

For the theorists there has only ever been two ways to increase an engines output without raising the state of tune , first is increased capacity and the second is higher compression ratio .

An RB30 is about 20% larger than an RB25 and the extra (in theory) 20% torque means you don't have to lean on it as hard to make it go . It also means you can size your turbos slightly larger because you aren't lacking poke down low . I think this is why you used to see twin cam RB30s with a GT3582R and the largest 1.06 turbine housing on them . The higher compression ment more torque down low and the turbo wanted to go in the low 3000s engine rev range . I remember reading about people having high comp RB30s in Skylines and going most places effortlessly in 4th or 5th gear , floating along the expressways using little to no boost on the hills . Generally high compression ratios have always meant better part throttle torque and its why some later NA cars are getting up there . In a part throttle state there is limited cylinder filling because the throttle/s are limiting airflow . What the cylinders do get is compressed into a smaller clearance volume creating greater dynamic compression and in theory higher combustion pressure .

No doubt some of this effortless running would have been because Skylines are geared for 2/2.5L engines and would have surely had taller diffs if RB30 had been a factory option . From memory VLs had 3.45 diffs and seemed to pull them ok in admittedly a lighter car than an R33 or R34 RWD .

A .

why is everyone pushing for another monster engine build when its all been done before, he has a near perfect setup already ,just needs a new bearing or something, id consider some better pistons maybe even consider some slightly racier cams but probably wouldnt bother,just fix whats broke and get back to driving it..

PS..return flows are pox, build something ridiculous like mine :P

From what I remember joeyjoey is pushing the RB30, a few other people have said why not just fix whats broken. I am just going along with what the owner is saying.

Obviously a higher comp engine will be more responsive, never get an argument from me on that front. Price of using a stock 30 bottom end might be a reason to go this way, after all RIPS can't have it all wrong.

I would argue your friend needed a smaller turbo to make some airflow down low to compensate for the lower compression. Going to a larger turbo (albeit larger turbine in your example) surely would have made it doggier down low.

Yeah I didnt quite get my thoughts into words very well. The lower compression with the same turbo will have worse response and worse power everywhere on the same boost level. The only advantage of lower compression is if you are going to run huge boost with a big turbo or if the only fuel available is poor. If the max power desired is not huge then higher compression will have better response and require less boost, especially if using E85.

Let me get this straight I think the stock 30 bottom end from RIPS is sensational and would be excellent. If joeyjoey chooses to not buy a short block and instead gets someone to build him an engine then surely choosing a slightly different piston/rod combo would not be much (if any) more expensive. All I am doing is throwing around some ideas. Thanks for the theory disco, helps back my ramblings.

An RB30 is about 20% larger than an RB25 and the extra (in theory) 20% torque means you don't have to lean on it as hard to make it go .

this

I remember reading about people having high comp RB30s in Skylines and going most places effortlessly in 4th or 5th gear , floating along the expressways using little to no boost on the hills .

when on cruises al's and i tend to msh the twisties at about the same speed... he is always on the CB (handsfree one) asking me what gear i'm in, and i'm always at least 1 gear and a couple thousand revs higher

Yeah I didnt quite get my thoughts into words very well. The lower compression with the same turbo will have worse response and worse power everywhere on the same boost level. The only advantage of lower compression is if you are going to run huge boost with a big turbo or if the only fuel available is poor. If the max power desired is not huge then higher compression will have better response and require less boost, especially if using E85.

Let me get this straight I think the stock 30 bottom end from RIPS is sensational and would be excellent. If joeyjoey chooses to not buy a short block and instead gets someone to build him an engine then surely choosing a slightly different piston/rod combo would not be much (if any) more expensive. All I am doing is throwing around some ideas. Thanks for the theory disco, helps back my ramblings.

i appreciate the thoughts guys as i'm still undecided as exactly where to go with this.... i just cant bear to spend a couple of thou to just be where i was before... i'd rather spend 4k and have "modification"

You looking at this:

RB30 Stock internal bottom ends, with RIPS modifications, fully refreshed NZD$3,500 rwd or $4,750 4wd including adapter plate kit (suit up to 600hp and 7200 rpm)

http://www.ripsltd.com/products.html

$3500NZD is roughly $2650AUD, so hopefully get it to Melbourne for $3k AUD. Then labour and tuning.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...