Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dyno's don't read time, they read rpm vs power (or variants of that). You can see the power under the curve, but you can't really tell the actual response time of the setup.

Good point if you are locked into rpm.

Surely you could set up the bottom axis as time though? I guess some of the old software is probably limiting but it would be a very simple calculation for the people who make it.

  • 2 months later...

oh, yes those pics on RHD are the correct HKS front pipes. one thing to note, they are quoting ID as 70mmX2 and single 85mm. most other places seem to quote OD which makes these approx 75mm X2 and 90mm single when comparing to other exhausts. I'll still measure mine this weekend, but those are the ones. best front pipes I've ever seen. have flex joint, have very, very nice welding, flanges welded on the inside, good quality stainless, extra thick flanges to help stop distortion and etc etc. they are the goods.

Baron,

Just bought a set of front pipes (possibly Top secret drag)

They are 75mm ID into over 100mm ID merge, Coupling this with a pair of Midori Dumps, would this not be a better front front half for a GT-R ?

What an interesting time for this thread to get bumped to the top, only a couple of days before someone is doing -5's on a stroker motor. That timing is such a coincidence its not even funny

Haha. Interested in a set of GT RS's? Going cheap :thumbsup:

Haha,

Thanks for the offer but I'm looking at the same thing as you (-5's) But I only have a little 2.64 odd Litre to play with unlike you big Forklift boys :D

Waiting for my 044's to show so I can finish the fuel system !!!

3.0>2.8.

That is all.

haha paul - were u really that impressed with my rb2630 :)

i now have an rb26 & i personally wouldn't do another rb2630, the car becomes a 'chop shop' & besides that, rb26 revs much nicer & howls when compared to the 3ltr

i also think though, either stick with the rb26 OR if u want larger displacement go straight to a 3ltr or larger :)

Is that like 32>33?

Yeah right! :nyaanyaa:

haha paul - were u really that impressed with my rb2630 :)

i now have an rb26 & i personally wouldn't do another rb2630, the car becomes a 'chop shop' & besides that, rb26 revs much nicer & howls when compared to the 3ltr

i also think though, either stick with the rb26 OR if u want larger displacement go straight to a 3ltr or larger :)

I have said it before and I will say it again.... After driving your car (and I have since driven Steveo's) you would be silly NOT to go that way. They rev, they do everything a 26 based block does... just better. You only have to butcher the car if you have a 32... the other two is no real issue.

I will say this though... if you have the engine out and WANT to keep the original block you have rocks in your head by staying the standard stroke crank. 77.7 mm at the very minimum. It makes the car so much nicer to drive!

Something I do notice is that not alot of people take advantage of the 26 bore stroke ratio, so realistically for alot of people going the 3.0 litre for lazier power is indeed a good option, particularly if you are beginning a rebuild.

There are lots and lots of very fast 2.6 litre cars though, some of the fastest in the world even.

Something I do notice is that not alot of people take advantage of the 26 bore stroke ratio, so realistically for alot of people going the 3.0 litre for lazier power is indeed a good option, particularly if you are beginning a rebuild.

There are lots and lots of very fast 2.6 litre cars though, some of the fastest in the world even.

Racecar is different. For the street a nice fat twist curve rules... Can't always have 5k + on board.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • f**king around with the bro
    • Ludenham   44.2 tops day no issues  
    • Then today, I went to visit a man with an r33 hat Peter and Road and Race sorted the alignment. As it is being set up for general track/hillclimbs etc it has a heap of caster (7o), less camber than I am used to (1o front and 2o rear, as the caster looks after that in turns without the braking downsides), 3mm front toe out and 0 toe rear. Will see how that goes and track tyre wear to see if it does need more camber, but adjsustment is also limited with nismo arms and adjustable bushes at only 1 end. It does have a bent inner tie rod on the driver's side front but as it came up within spec I'll just leave that as is. So, that is getting close to my chapter of this story....could of tidy ups then a shakedown in early October before it finds a new home.
    • So, it went to Unigroup for a run in and tune on Friday, everything went (generally) well. In terms of fixes, the engine was good and there were no leaks. It needed plugs (I hadn't checked them because the coil pack cover was on a new engine and I couldn't imagine they weren't new.....but turns out the temporary plugs to just keep it sealed up were in there.....new plugs gapped to 0.8 and it was fine from there. Also, there was a little preload on the clutch slave which caused some slip. I haven't had the box off so I don't know what the clutch looks like; my guess it is brand new and the pedal had not been adjusted....backed that off a bit and it held fine. Last thing will have Dose crying....the idle especially when cold is a bit difficult between the cams, forward plenum, atmo blow off valve and an 80s air management system. It is fine when hot but a little uneven when cold, will see if I can sort or at least improve that one cold morning. Other than that, tuning went fine. It made 245 but was pulled back to 227 which 2 opportunities to improve in future. 1. The factory CAS is not great and was jumping around at high RPM, so Mark took 2 degrees out up top (that is why it stops making power and lost 20kw). Very safe this way and the extra power is available but will require a more modern ECU and better cam (or even better crank) sensor 2. The 2871 in factory housings is very big for a low mount, and the internal wastegate is too small, so it was creeping from mid range all the way to redline....the duty cycle on the boost controller is turned down a little for safety. That is much harder to fix, it would need a large external gate and that would require a whole bunch of other changes, so it will go as it is for now. It feels nice and healthy and safe, so should be good for about a billion laps like this.
    • what sort of caliper are they? If they are a slider and you gave everything a good clean, you might need to regrease the pins. My guess though is they will come good after some abuse as suggested above
×
×
  • Create New...