Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

Sorry to post what must be a very basic question.

I have just recently obtained a set of new tyres. Previously I had 4x 255/35/r18's.

However, when I went to replace them I was advised that smaller tyres are better for handling, in general. The car is a RWD Skyline, so I was advised I'd get far better handling by running something like 235's up front, and 255's at the rear.

I hadn't heard of anything like this before. Is this true? Is it just weight that would make a difference? We'll assume that the rims involved can fit both tyre widths fine, is there actually a disadvantage for running wider front tires on a RWD car?

Again, sorry if there's a lot of people facepalming away at what is a very basic question that I couldn't find any info on, anywhere.

... I was advised that smaller tyres are better for handling, in general.
... so I was advised I'd get far better handling by running something like 235's up front, and 255's at the rear.

These 2 statements contradict each other.

The tyres are there for GRIP. Wider tyres at the rear will, in general, increase the rear grip levels, and that may induce understeer. And, if you are going to fit 2 different size tyres front & rear, then you really should fit 2 different size rims front and rear, because tyres have an optimum rim width which they are designed to fit.

My 2c worth.

Sorry, I should revise and say that smaller tyres at the front

As in reducing size from a 255 to a 235 at the fronts would improve handling of the car in general, and that going larger would actually cause the car to handle worse. This was irrespective of rim size (i.e, with an appropriate rim for whatever tyre size ultimately selected)

Still stands - smaller tyre at the front / larger at the rear means that the rear has more grip, conversely the front has LESS grip. Result - understeer.

Consider the ultimate in tyre size discrepany in a Top Fuel dragster. They have minimal requirements for front grip because they basically don't need to turn corners, so have VERY SMALL front tyres, but have HUGE rear tyres for acceleration grip.

I realise that, which was why I was skeptical. Surely more tyre, more grip?

Unless he was suggesting somewhat of an offset to counter for a skyline's (somewhat) natural desire to ....oversteer? Uh. Would have thought they were more prone to understeer.

I'm just trying to understand why, when presented with a customer who wanted to buy 4x 255's, that he would try and sell them a cheaper tyre (as its smaller) under the premise of providing better handling.

The angle he was going was that it was physically harder to handle the car (i.e, turn the wheel) if you have big fat fronts.

Is this, for lack of a better term - Completely incorrect? Or one of those things thats technically correct but so infintely small an effect as so it wouldn't be there at all?

At carpark speeds you may notice it's slightly heavier, but thats what power steering is for. Highway speeds you won't notice a difference.

He probably tried to sell you the 235's beacause they're cheaper for him to buy, which means more profit when selling.

I'm guessing 235/40/18 to keep close to the same rolling diameter as the rear ?

well there are some reasons that might be true in some cases. but clearly as a general rule, wider tyres in the same compound will grip better.

some reasons smaller may be better:

* you can buy a better tyre for your money. A good 225 will certainly grip better than a bad 255

* tyre is too wide for the rim - 255 is too wide for an 8" rim but 225 is not

* wet and loose/gravel grip can be better with a narrow tyre because it cuts through the water/dirt to a better surface below.

but generally, a wider tyre grips better because each bit of rubber has longer off the road.

a wider tyre does NOT result in more rubber touching the road. the amount of rubber touching the road is the same for any tyre size for the same weight of car and same tyre pressure, it is just the shape of the rubber in the road that changes.

Thats more or less what I was thinking, the car had 255's all round before on Potenza RE050A's. He recommended I go smaller. I just found it odd. In the future I'm happy to go back to a 255 profile for better grip. I wasnt exactly being stingy, the tyres he ended up selling me (which grip well, at least atm for what the car is, I can't complain, though I don't notice the steering to be noticably better) were considerably cheaper than the ones I walked in and attempted to buy.

So as this is odd from a sales point of view, I thought I'd ask the wiser minds here. :P Thanks for the! feedback.

Yep smaller tyres give better handling. Wider tyres give better grip. When it comes to tyres then grip and handling are commonly considered to be inversely related, all other things being equal.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kinkstah, no, coilovers aren't illegal, especially as a bolt straight in. The illegal part will be if they're altering suspension geometry beyond factory limits, or the ride height is not legal.   Sounds like the blue slipper just didn't want to deal with any later possibility of mods appearing on the car.
    • The problem has always been that coilovers are able to be adjusted, almost at any time, to be too low. Most people who ever get/got defected for/with coilovers were actually afoul of the minimum ride height rule. So the interpretation by cops/inspectors was always that it is pointless to allow numpty to raise his coilovers and get the car inspected/cleared, then just drop them back down again as soon as they get around the corner from the inspection station.  This led to the interpretation that they were illegal unless rendered such that they can't be adjusted (ie, collars welded to the body, that sort of thing). That may or may not have ever actually been the official line, but I'm pretty sure it's not considered to be a solution these days. Coilovers themselves fall under clause 3.2 b of that manual, because they are an "installation of a variable ride height system" and they don't fit the exclusions in that clause (which point to air springs and other pneumatic adjusters). So, as per previous statements, they require engineering cert to be legal on the road. Once you have such cert, provided you do not adjust them outside the height range covered by the cert, you are OK. Without, you have an unroadworthy vehicle.
    • Here E10 is the cheapest fuel. And general advice is to not use it unless you hate your car. From what I remember it clogs up stuff in the fuel system or injectors?  With US/Canada being E10 across the board, does that mean that all fuel there is terrible?
    • Sorry, are coilovers ACTUALLY ILLEGAL in NSW? They aren't in Vic, as long as they retain 70% of stock travel and the car is above 100mm off the ground. Does NSW actually have a law making coilovers actually illegal? RWC/Blue Slip/Engineering people not knowing the actual f**king laws boils my blood. Demand them to point to the documentation that states a coilover is illegal. (it may exist in NSW ) Edit: I checked. They aren't. https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-02/RMS-infosheet-light-vehicle-modifications-manual-suspension-and-ride-height.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...