Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, last week i got my car tuned (finally) ended up running haltech e11 v2 and we got 260rwkw on only 14psi and 400nm torque. Could'nt go any more as auto started slipping and small intercooler seen the air temp to 70+ degrees. Still stoked as hell though it goes like a cut cat!

Now what i cant figure out is why i fill my (small) catch can so fast, it fills with clean oil that doesnt smell burnt at all and only seems to come from the passenger side cam cover breather, iv got the can plumbed back (sucking oil through system) i get no smoke that i can see at all out of exhaust.

My pcv? valve is clean and working too.

Im running an N1 pump and 0w-40 edge sport oil, done full build- rods, cp forgies, oversize bore, port n polish and heaps more.

Strange thing is on the dyno it didnt get a drop of oil in can, but driving on road it does (only when WOT)

My theory = oil filling cam cover faster than it can drain back helped by g-forces of acceleration therefore running into can when theres nowhere else for it to go.

Motor is 2500km old and runs smooth as.

I cant remember is there a drain in head at back of the passenger side cam cover? if not my idea might be correct?

I do run about 20mm overfull of oil to avoid getting any air up etc.

I think thats all i can tell you all

Sorry didnt add its an rb25det...

Edited by abr33

You have an N1 oil pump flowing to much oil into the head to which a stock RB has that problem from factory so all the oil is stuck in the head and none in the sump you might want to get it fixed asap as you will prob spin a bearing or something else.

As above you need oil restrictors put into the block to stop this from happening or a gravity fed oil return line from the back of the head into the sump (personally I have both and the N1 pump and no oil in catch can or the blow-by hose)

Cheers jez, found a few good threads!

How would it get on by tigging on a fitting to back of cam cover (exhaust side) and running a hose down to sump possibly in with the turbo oil return line? just how much oil needs to flow down?

nah a fitting is tapped into the middle of the head and a hose is run down the intake side and plumbed into the sump

Like this:

http://www.spoolimpo...OilDrainKit.asp

(although this shows it going down the hot side which I would imagine that hose would simply fail)

Edited by blinksta

Looks alright, and yeah i imagine the hose would melt...

Recon before pulling head off its worth trying running return from the cam cover down?

Im only reving it to about 7500, most that have the issue iv now read about are revving them a fair bit harder than that?

Plus i see that running from rear of head is obviously lower, but providing you can get enough drainage, and not be filling catch can, and have enough oil in sump to not run out, your winning right?

And sorry about starting new thread on a known topic, i was searching with all the wrong words before

I know the pain of having the head removed for something so simple, but these are the two main fixes (that I know of) to stop flowing to much oil in the head and none in the sump.

If the problem continues you could possibly have to re-build the engine again because no oil would be getting to the oil squirters (amoungst other things) underneath the piston which is then a domino effect.

End of the day as long as the sump has sufficient oil to continue operating under full load then everything is fine (famous last word :nyaanyaa:).

Failing that you can just not go WOT :teehee:

Edited by blinksta

0-40w wont be helping you..too thin..

this is a 40year old engine design, it was made to run on 20/50w when new. least i would use is 10/40,, just my view..

Edited by rockabilly

Is this a street car or a track/drift/drag car?

If its only a street car then your probably better of putting the standard oil pump back on, that should fix your problem.

nah a fitting is tapped into the middle of the head and a hose is run down the intake side and plumbed into the sump

Like this:

http://www.spoolimpo...OilDrainKit.asp

(although this shows it going down the hot side which I would imagine that hose would simply fail)

you do it to the exhaust side for a reason, the rotation of the crank aids drainage on that side.

If you're trying to get excess oil from the head to the sump, you need a drain on the exhaust side from the head, down to the sump.

If you're trying to lower the crank pressure in respect to the head to also help drainage, you run one on the inlet side of the motor. It all has to do with the way the crank is spinning.

Do you still have the front oil drain on the passenger side connected, and not blocked?

I use it on the road, i may take it to track for fun but nothing serious. I do still have the front exh side drain and it works.

If i put a restrictor in with thin oil will it supply enough to the lifters?

Or if i was to put stock pump on, will it supply enough oil to everything?

SO, do i neave n1 on and restrict with drain back pipe, or put stock pump on with thicker oil?

And will the stock pump handle up to 8k revs and pushing 350kw? (thats my next tune goal)

OR, do i run thick oil and keep running the n1 pump?

Which is the best solution for street/very occasional drag use?

p.s. i do overfill the oil by near 2L because iv heard if this problem once before

thanks for the input

Personally i think 2 litres overfilled is way too much, usually only gtr boys do it due to the extra g forces, and only by 1 litre, however it may have saved your engine. Im pretty sure to fit the rear oil drain you have to pull the head anyway, and to fit an oil pump, you have to pull the timing belt and sump. If it were me , i would use thicker oil only .5 litre overfill, and boot it once, check the catch can, if it is dry, then boot it twice and check again.

There is a lot of debate ver the head drains, but i cant see them making anything worse. I would be pulling the head if the oil doesnt fix it, and doing the restrictors and the drain if you are inclined.

Used to happen to my RB25DET at only 7000 rev/min max. It is a known issue. I don't know why there are so many different answers. One theory is that pressure builds up in the sump preventing oil from returning. In any case restrictors to the supply and extra drainage seems to be necessary.

Used to happen to my RB25DET at only 7000 rev/min max. It is a known issue. I don't know why there are so many different answers. One theory is that pressure builds up in the sump preventing oil from returning. In any case restrictors to the supply and extra drainage seems to be necessary.

so many different answers?

i only hear the one set of answers, the cause, from what i have read, has nothing to do with sump pressure, its purely because at WOT for extended periods of time will empty the sump into the head due to a lack of drainage back to the sump, obviously with that much oil in the head and a vent drawing air out from that area it is obvious that it will draw oil out with it.

2 litres is too much to over fill it, from what i have read for general street with a bit of "spirited" driving an extra 500ml and for track days an extra litre.

ok so running thicker oil should help alot, but say i rev it right out for a while say doing a top speed run, with thicker oil in it will it still eventually pump it all to the head or will extra .5 to 1L make it physically impossible to pump the sump dry?

Further to that, why did it not breath a drop on the dyno? or is the issue only present when g forces are in play?

thicker oil might help it not be sucked out the vent tube as easy but since it is thicker and flows slower it would take longer to get back to the sump so it would make that problem worse, the only way to fix the problem is head off and do all the fixes, revving it less would also help or fitting a standard oil pump.

If ur catch can is connected to the air intake of the turbo, try just having that line breathing to atmosphere so there is no vaccuum action sucking the oil from the head.

If the problem is still there try get some cam cover baffles. I think tomei make them. Helps stop the oil making its

Way out

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
    • Short inlet runners cost quite a bit. Dulls off the off-boost torque, and delays boost onset, because arrival of boost is driven by gas flow is a product of the ability to flow air which is torque. This is the reason that the stock manifolds have longer runners. On a 3L, or bigger, you can usually accept the compromise of giving away some torque because the extra capacity gives you a little extra to waste. But on a smaller motor, there's not a lot there to start with. Example, I swapped RB20 out of my R32, 25NeoDET in its place. The "wall of torque" that I experienced afterwards made it all worthwhile. That's because I came from RB20 land where torque is not a thing. But I would not do anything, anything at all, to reduce the low/mid torque I have now, because I remember what it is like to not have it!
    • Really, low/midrange torque goes really bad?? I want decent acceleration, maybe I use a stock rb25det neo manifold?    
×
×
  • Create New...