Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey fellas,

Hoping to get some more front camber and a touch less roll for the R32 GTR and was wondering what the likes of you motorsport guys use (Roy, Beer Baron, Marlin etc).

I've done some searching but don't seem to be able to find any clear answers on good brands.

There's a tonne of Japanese brands, whiteline etc but am hoping to get some feed back from guys who race/ take their cars out on the track.

Cheers,

Ollie.

Edited by OLLIE_NZ

Do you want adjustable arms or just bushes.

For arms it is very hard to go past Ikeya Formula but will pay through the nose for their quality.

I'm not 100% sure but most of the Jap brand sway bars are non adjustable.

Cool, the cheapy ones are ok....ish...but weigh a tonne (my cheapy front arms were more than double the weight of the standard ones) and the bearings flog out pretty quick.

I dont have any experience with Cusco products but I hear they are ok.

upper arms for a 32gtr are a nightmare. especially if you run a bit of extra caster as well.

I have to run standard arms and can have adjustable bushes...so that's what I run. But I have to replace the bushes every 3-4 race meets

upper arms for a 32gtr are a nightmare. especially if you run a bit of extra caster as well.

I have to run standard arms and can have adjustable bushes...so that's what I run. But I have to replace the bushes every 3-4 race meets

Duncan is right the front arms on an R32 are a horror story. If you just use the Whiteline bushes & go near a track you destroy the bushes unless you keep the stock castor rods. Even then I am not sure they last very well.

This is what I did.

Bought the Nismo front end suspension link kit. This gets you a longer LCA (which helps a little), a revised upper link mounting bracket (which helps eliminate the too much castor trashing bushes issue) and a castor rod which I didn't use.

Then having given up trying to find anything decent I had some upper arms made & used a Whiteline bush kit. That way you get to choose the castor & the camber. If you want the thing to be half decent on the track without resorting to stupid spring rates you will need over four degrees of each.

Sway bars are Cusco rear & Whiteline front. The Whiteline ones are a bit crap because they are solid bar & weigh a tonne. Cusco & Nismo (I think) ones are atleast hollow but are non adjustable. The adjustability on the Whiteline ones is a bit bullshit anyway becasue the front is always full soft & the rear full hard.

You also need an attessa controller (for more front bias) which allows you to run a harder rear spring for a little less understeer.

Not sure which Cusco arms are being referred to (Above, a couple posts back) but they weight a tonne and use bearing which I would imagine would last atleast 5 minutes. I have a pair with stuffed bearings in the shed at home. I wouldn't recommend them.

Edited by djr81

I'll echo what the other guys said. front upper arms are a pain in a 32 if you plan on running decent castor and camber at the same time. the castor basically subjects the upper arm to a twisting motion and it flogs out whatever bush or bearing is in there.

depends how hardcore you want to go and what the budget is. I'll give you 2 options.

budget option:

get standard front upper arms cut and shut (shorter = more camber) and add adjustable bushes to fine tune (whatever brand you want). also add some grease nipples so you can lube the bushes with arms on the car.

get some whiteline swaybars front and rear (I agree with DJR, I had them on one of my 32s and only ever ran full soft front and full hard rear, tried other settings but just made it want to push understeer into the corner and mid corner)

get cusco castor rods. good value, have proper 3 piece steel rods ends (not cast) and have good dust boots. and are cheapish.

the $$$ option is:

stick with the upper arms mentioned above, or run the noltec arms (may be out of production, I have a set and they have by far lasted the longest, they are a sliding style arm and have grease nipples built in, keeping the bushes lubed seems to keep them alive much longer). The cusco arms are fixed length and are ok (i have them on my other 32) but not fantastic for the money, same goes with the ikeya upper arms.

get some front lower control arms. ikeya are the best by far and incorporate new castor rods too so you don't need to buy others. this means you can adjust camber with the lower arm too, and even get a bit more front track if you have an adjustable upper arm to go with it.

get either cusco sway bars (good option, lightweight, not too expnesive but not adjustable), or if money is no object get the ARC bars (stupid expensive but excellent and come with rose jointed adjustable links which work very well - i have these on my other 32).

as far as brands go, all the cheap chinese arms that are dog bone shaped are pretty rubbish. they are usually too long so when you wind them in the two ends touch inside the cuff which means they need cutting, on top of that I've had one set and the bearings lasted literally about 300km on road and 1 track day. they look like they use skateboard wheel bearings!

jap brands, basically all the ikeya formula gear works well and is built to withstand nuclear blasts. most of the serious track cars (that aren't restricted by rules) use their arms in aus and in japan. I have supplied heaps of guys in aus with ikeya gear and they last long enough to go from car to car...

cusco gear is a bit more entry level but these days is nicely made and well designed and lasts pretty well. fairly good value.

ARC sway bars are nice but their other suspension gear is a bit dated now. well they make nice strut braces but they do the job no better than your average $100 one. not sure strut braces even count as suspension parts...

most of the other brands I steer away from. there's some good 'boutique' type brands like nagisa auto etc but basically everything you need can be bought from ikeya formula and/or cusco.

  • Like 1

Just a couple of things to note about the upper arms:

There are TWO measurements you need to think about. The first is obvious - the length of the arms. The second less so. As you can see from the photo the arm is not straight - the outside pivot is forward of the inside pivot.

From right to left the arms are:

1 Standard. 182mm long (from memory) and has an offset of about 15mm

2. Cusco that is 10mm shorter than stock & with an offset of 22mm for LESS castor hence less load on the bearings (in this case)

3. Shorter arm I had made to basically replicate the Cusco dims but use Whiteline bushes.

4. Shorter (again) arm with less offset.

The thing is you can only run such an offset with the modified inner mounting bracket from Nismo otherwise it just tears itself to bits.

Also the white bush you can see is one turned up out of Nylon because the Whiteline one is too soft & keeps failing. Nylon hasnt given up yet after alot of track days.

post-5134-0-25486600-1298863864_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1

yeah well explained. so basically with the nismo inner arm mounts due to how they are inclined a bit towards the front of the car you can run arms with less offset yeah? so the 'twist' is taken up in the bracket not the arm?

I like the idea of nylon bushes. I like your djr81 mk 3 arms, with short length and less offset. I guess it explains why the cusco arms live longer as with more offset they effectively steal a bit of castor in favour of keeping their bearings from failing.

I wish you could just purchase the bloody nismo inner mounts separately. I guess the LCA is useful too but if you already have say ikeya LCA's it's a lot to spend just to get 2 brackets. I have seen what looked like modified standard brackets before too and to go 1 step further I've seen a 32 with 33 style upright and upper arm which is an even better solution as you can adjust both sides of the arm however you wish to give it camber whilst keeping it moving through a nice straight arc.

yeah well explained. so basically with the nismo inner arm mounts due to how they are inclined a bit towards the front of the car you can run arms with less offset yeah? so the 'twist' is taken up in the bracket not the arm?

Yeah the rear of the two drilled holes is lower and the front ones are closer to the centre. So the arm (bushes really) is loaded less with more castor.

The wheel needs to sit in the middle of the wheel arch so as the castor angle increases the amount of twist increases. Less castor (like Cusco arms) less load.

I like the idea of nylon bushes. I like your djr81 mk 3 arms, with short length and less offset. I guess it explains why the cusco arms live longer as with more offset they effectively steal a bit of castor in favour of keeping their bearings from failing.

The nylon bush was a cheap and nasty fix that I got done for beer. Turns out it was a permanent fix. You only need one per side.

I wish you could just purchase the bloody nismo inner mounts separately. I guess the LCA is useful too but if you already have say ikeya LCA's it's a lot to spend just to get 2 brackets. I have seen what looked like modified standard brackets before too and to go 1 step further I've seen a 32 with 33 style upright and upper arm which is an even better solution as you can adjust both sides of the arm however you wish to give it camber whilst keeping it moving through a nice straight arc.

The cost of the Nismo bits is pretty stupid given:

1. The bracket is a stock bracket with different drill holes and a coat of silver paint.

2. The LCA is a stock bit with the outer pick up point moved 5mm or so outwards. Also painted silver.

3. The castor rod is a stock item but a few mm shorter & you guessed it, painted silver.

But they fix problems, increase castor & camber so in the end you take the pain. The worst of it is ripping out the ABS unit just to get the LHS one in and having to bleed the brakes.

As djr81 mention the nismo gear is nice but very $$$ and the adjustment it gives you is still very limited

Nismo give the follow specs for the Circuit Link Set

Changes

* Effective length of the tension rod has been shortened (-5mm) to provide optimum caster angle.

* Effective length of transverse link has been lengthened (+4mm) to provide optimal camber angle.

*The position of the installation holes on the upper arm of the upper link bracket has been changed to restrict the twisting that can result from high caster position, and provide optimal camber angle.

* Changes in alignment, on standard vehicle height (Designed value):

Caster angle: Before installation: 3°40’; after installation: 4°25’

Camber angle: Before installation: -0°55’; after installation: -1°25’

The figures above may vary by ±0.45, depending on individual vehicle characteristics.

I just pick myself up a second hand Link Set plus upper arm from japan and price was still well over $500 for all the gear (FYI brand new the Link set not inc the upper arm is around 90,000yen And i am unsure if you can still buy the nismo upper arm)

600x4502011020800058.jpg

For Swaybar if you want adjustable and willing to pay the extra cash go ARC, however you are looking at around $1000 for both the F and R sway bar. Cusco is alot better price at around $400-$500ish for the set. Nismo are alittle more $$$ around $600 (ran nismo sway bars on my previous track car gts-t and found them to be great)

Pic of the Ikeya fourmula upper arm to compare to the nismo one

aqua_a32-img600x450-1298811094prviuz20175.jpg

BTW Ollie, what suspension will you be running and spring rate?

Edited by Kaido_RR

Also go over to the ikeya Formula website http://www.ikeya-f.co.jp/en/index.html they have some interesting information regarding they arms set. If i was going full out i would use the Ikeya Formula gear however it will not be cheap :(

o.gif

gtrfrontlow2.jpg

Edited by Kaido_RR

Back in the olden days Nismo did actually make an adjustable arm. Now all it appears to be is a stock unit with harder bushes = waste of money.

But that does help make sense of some of the references in the Nismo cattle dogs.

post-5134-0-36339600-1298874185_thumb.jpeg

  • Like 1

Back in the olden days Nismo did actually make an adjustable arm. Now all it appears to be is a stock unit with harder bushes = waste of money.

But that does help make sense of some of the references in the Nismo cattle dogs.

wonder why nismo went to non-adjustable arm. From everything i read adjustable arms are no good due to the vibration losing the adjustable nuts? true or myth ?

Yeah the rear of the two drilled holes is lower and the front ones are closer to the centre. So the arm (bushes really) is loaded less with more castor.

The wheel needs to sit in the middle of the wheel arch so as the castor angle increases the amount of twist increases. Less castor (like Cusco arms) less load.

The nylon bush was a cheap and nasty fix that I got done for beer. Turns out it was a permanent fix. You only need one per side.

The cost of the Nismo bits is pretty stupid given:

1. The bracket is a stock bracket with different drill holes and a coat of silver paint.

2. The LCA is a stock bit with the outer pick up point moved 5mm or so outwards. Also painted silver.

3. The castor rod is a stock item but a few mm shorter & you guessed it, painted silver.

But they fix problems, increase castor & camber so in the end you take the pain. The worst of it is ripping out the ABS unit just to get the LHS one in and having to bleed the brakes.

you forgot they also have harder bushes in the castor rod, not just silver paint and a few lass mm!

yeah the only bit I want is the mounts too. they are a FKER to get out if you are lazy like me and don't want to remove other gear. as you found out nissan decided to utilise the nice big studs they are mounted with to bolt the ABS to the inner guard. thanks a lot!! and trying to get a spanner onto those nuts on the pass side is not easy from memory.

the old nismo arms should be quite useful if anyone could find some that were still in good shape and providing they go short enough.

wonder why nismo went to non-adjustable arm. From everything i read adjustable arms are no good due to the vibration losing the adjustable nuts? true or myth ?

kaido, if vibration causing nuts and bolts to undo was a serious problem we'd all be fcked with wheels falling off and cars rattling to pieces. I've run sliding arms with bolts for years without them slipping. nissan just switched to the tight arse option of re-selling stock arms with harder bushes (painted silver). the other problem with all the nismo bits is NONE are adjustable so you just have to close your eyes and hope like hell they are perfect for your car, ride height, driving style, spring rate and type of tyre.....ummm. saves on alignment though as you can't change anything except F+R toe and rear camber (just like standard).

kaido, if vibration causing nuts and bolts to undo was a serious problem we'd all be fcked with wheels falling off and cars rattling to pieces. I've run sliding arms with bolts for years without them slipping. nissan just switched to the tight arse option of re-selling stock arms with harder bushes (painted silver). the other problem with all the nismo bits is NONE are adjustable so you just have to close your eyes and hope like hell they are perfect for your car, ride height, driving style, spring rate and type of tyre.....ummm. saves on alignment though as you can't change anything except F+R toe and rear camber (just like standard).

cheers. It was a gamble for me to go the nismo gear.. I didn't want to spend the big bucks to kit out everything in Ikeya but i wanted some improvement over the std gear hopefully the nismo gear gives me that little extra.

Little off topic but what do you guys run in the rear? After installing my suspension and and adjusting the height i have way to much camber in the rear (2 degree+), which i am surprise as the car isn't that low

if on a budget in the rear go cusco rear upper arms and ikeya traction rods (or any brand traction rod really, just that from memory cusco don't make 32 ones, if the do now just get both in cusco).

rear camber is adjustable from the factory though (not much). have you adjusted it out using that? still if you have over 2 degrees neg the factory adjustment won't be enough to get to a more sensible amount. again though it depends on what tyres you're running.

cheers. It was a gamble for me to go the nismo gear.. I didn't want to spend the big bucks to kit out everything in Ikeya but i wanted some improvement over the std gear hopefully the nismo gear gives me that little extra.

Little off topic but what do you guys run in the rear? After installing my suspension and and adjusting the height i have way to much camber in the rear (2 degree+), which i am surprise as the car isn't that low

You can use the Whiteline kit on the rear on both the inner & outer pivots. Also on the traction arms which is sort of a good idea to reduce bump steer although to be honest I never really had an issue with it.

Anyway if you use the bushes set the outer ones to as long an effective length as you can. Reason being that once they are on the car they are a complete &$%^ to adjust with the wheels on. Which they will be if you are trying to align the thing.

But having done all that you will struggle to get down to -1.5 degrees.

So aftermarket is not such a bad idea.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Next on the to-do list was an oil and filter change. Nothing exciting to add here except the oil filter is in a really stupid place (facing the engine mount/subframe/steering rack). GReddy do a relocation kit which puts it towards the gearbox, I would have preferred towards the front but there's obviously a lot more stuff there. Something I'll have to look at for the next service perhaps. First time using Valvoline oil, although I can't see it being any different to most other brands Nice... The oil filter location... At least the subframe wont rust any time soon I picked up a genuine fuel filter, this is part of the fuel pump assembly inside the fuel tank. Access can be found underneath the rear seat, you'll see this triangular cover Remove the 3x plastic 10mm nuts and lift the cover up, pushing the rubber grommet through The yellow fuel line clips push out in opposite directions, remove these completely. The two moulded fuel lines can now pull upwards to disconnect, along with the wire electrical plug. There's 8x 8mm bolts that secure the black retaining ring. The fuel pump assembly is now ready to lift out. Be mindful of the fuel hose on the side, the hose clamp on mine was catching the hose preventing it from lifting up The fuel pump/filter has an upper and lower section held on by 4 pressure clips. These did take a little bit of force, it sounded like the plastic tabs were going to break but they didn't (don't worry!) The lower section helps mount the fuel pump, there's a circular rubber gasket/grommet/seal thing on the bottom where the sock is. Undo the hose clip on the short fuel hose on the side to disconnect it from the 3 way distribution pipe to be able to lift the upper half away. Don't forget to unplug the fuel pump too! There's a few rubber O rings that will need transferring to the new filter housing, I show these in the video at the bottom of this write up. Reassembly is the reverse Here's a photo of the new filter installed, you'll be able to see where the tabs are more clearing against the yellow OEM plastic Once the assembly is re-installed, I turned the engine over a few times to help build up fuel pressure. I did panic when the car stopped turning over but I could hear the fuel pump making a noise. It eventually started and has been fine since. Found my 'lucky' coin underneath the rear seat too The Youtube video can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLJ65pmQt44&t=6s
    • It was picked up on the MOT/Inspection that the offside front wheel bearing had excessive play along with the ball joint. It made sense to do both sides so I sourced a pair of spare IS200 hubs to do the swap. Unfortunately I don't have any photos of the strip down but here's a quick run down. On the back of the hub is a large circular dust cover, using a flat head screw driver and a mallet I prised it off. Underneath will reveal a 32mm hub nut (impact gun recommended). With the hub nut removed the ABS ring can be removed (I ended up using a magnetic pick up tool to help). Next up is to remove the stub axle, this was a little trickier due to limited tools. I tried a 3 leg puller but the gap between the hub and stub axle wasn't enough for the legs to get in and under. Next option was a lump hammer and someone pulling the stub axle at the same time. After a few heavy hits it released. The lower bearing race had seized itself onto the stub axle, which was fine because I was replacing them anyway. With the upper bearing race removed and the grease cleaned off they looked like this The left one looked pristine inside but gave us the most trouble. The right one had some surface rust but came apart in a single hit, figure that out?! I got a local garage to press the new wheel bearings in, reassemble was the opposite and didn't take long at all. Removing the hub itself was simple. Starting with removing the brake caliper, 2x 14mm bolts for the caliper slider and 2x 19mm? for the carrier > hub bolts. I used a cable tie to secure the caliper to the upper arm so it was out of the way, there's a 10mm bolt securing the ABS sensor on. With the brake disc removed from the hub next are the three castle nuts for the upper and lower ball joints and track rod end. Two of these had their own R clip and one split pin. A few hits with the hammer and they're released (I left the castle nuts on by a couple of turns), the track rod ends gave me the most grief and I may have nipped the boots (oops). Fitting is the reversal and is very quick and easy to do. The lower ball joints are held onto the hub by 2x 17mm bolts. The castle nut did increase in socket size to 22mm from memory (this may vary from supplier) The two front tyres weren't in great condition, so I had those replaced with some budget tyres for the time being. I'll be replacing the wheels and tyres in the future, this was to get me on the road without the worry of the police hassling me.
    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
×
×
  • Create New...