Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Tried to post this earlier, had a few issues with my computer, I apologise if it is a double post.

Been scanning through the topics, and I can't really find a definative answer.

I have a 1998 Series 2 Nissan Stagea RS Four S(neo engined).

It has developed a strange boost issue, after using the turbo for a short period, it will go from making full boost to making only half boost.

If I stop the car and switch the ignition off, start it again and drive down the road, I will get full boost again for a short time, then the issue will return.

The car is standard apart from an apexi air filter.

Always run on 99 ron petrol.

When the car recieved a full service the mechanic noticed, the recirculating dump valve had been disconnected and blanked off. He reconnected it and plumbed it back in, however I didn't experience the boost loss immediately after this had been done.

Is it safe to run the car without the recirculating dump valve? I experienced no issues before the car was serviced, apart from coilpack failure, the car mis-fired and shuddered from 3800rpm to 5000rpm.

I have checked all the hoses and can't find any leaks.

I have been told it could be a temp sensor, near the top radiator hose.

The recirculating valve could be leaking.

The turbo actuator, could be sticking open.

Does anyone else have any suggestions, or let me know if you have experienced this problem.

Cheers everyone

I'm sure someone will be able to clarify this, but I used to have the same issue, it happened when I ran less then 98 octane fuel, engine would knock and computer would retard boost to factory 7 psi instead of the 11 that it normally ran, so if ur running increased boost on factory computer it could have something to do with this? Like I said I'm no expert just saying that was the case with mine, only use 98 octane and problem has not resurfaced

block vacuum lines to boost solenoid.

its for cold start boost and warm boost. it will also revert if boost is increased for whatever reason.

just bypass it by removing and blocking boost solenoid.

block vacuum lines to boost solenoid.

its for cold start boost and warm boost. it will also revert if boost is increased for whatever reason.

just bypass it by removing and blocking boost solenoid.

???what??

Test temp sensor by disconnecting the one that goes to the ecu - the three wire one not the two wire one (or the two wire not the one wire - don't have a car to look at just now).. The ecu will revert to stored maps. If it runs better that way get a new sensor. The sensors are relatively expensive and you don't want to replace it just to see.

???what??

Test temp sensor by disconnecting the one that goes to the ecu - the three wire one not the two wire one (or the two wire not the one wire - don't have a car to look at just now).. The ecu will revert to stored maps. If it runs better that way get a new sensor. The sensors are relatively expensive and you don't want to replace it just to see.

isnt there a line into a boost solenoid fron the wastegate vacum line. goes into a elctric module, and exits a vacuum line into the suction pipe(filter to turbo)

i saw a thread somewhere in the DIY section explaining how to bypass it to avoid that low boost setting, and runs all the time on hi boost.

i dont think i made sense.

You mean like this:

This is the 10 minute no cost boost to 0.5 bar rerouting of the vacuum hoses [thanks to SK]. Disconnect the two vacuum hoses from the solenoid. Then connect the boost feed (from the cross over pipe on the left of the picture) to the standard T piece. Connect one side of the T piece directly to the wastegate actuator (on the right of the picture). The remaining connection on the T piece goes back into the inlet via the BOV return pipe (on the standard fitting). Make sure to put the standard brass restrictor in that vacuum hose to bypass the desired amount back into the turbo inlet. The standard bypass hole of 1.25 mm bypasses enough air flow for 0.5 bar. (See photo)

PS: If you want more boost you can drill out the bypass, 1.5 mm = more boost (around 0.7 bar) 1.75mm = a bit more (around 1.0 bar).

there is no such thing as cold start / warm boost levels on the C34 stagea's, and for the RS4-S there is only one setting, 7psi (it does lift a little more after a fmic and exhaust is fitted). the auto's have the 2 stagea boost switching from 5 - 7psi. i'd say the solenoid is working perfectly fine considering your getting high boost, and that something is triggering it to turn off giving only safe low boost, my bet is with what Chris_Beli said, you are getting some knock causing the knock maps and low boost settings to kick in. turning the car off for a bit resets this.

Shaun, assuming your only running the stock boost control setup, first thing i'd be checking is the base timing with a timing light. it is possible that it has been set a little bit too high, therefore adding a few degrees to the stock timing maps and causing it to knock on load. is the apexi air filter you have a pod filter, if so do you have a heat shield around it? if not sucking in hot engine bay air wont be helping.

running the car with no recirculating BOV and stock ecu in most cases is a real pain in the ass because nissan uses a mass air flow meter to calculate load. with no BOV, when you back off your essentially stalling the airflow meter, no airflow across it means no fuel injected, which leads to constant engine stalling. thats just the main issue, there are others associated with it, do a search of SAU and you'll find tonnes of threads about it.

your car is trying to tell you something is wrong .

my car would do that some days if i launched it and wound out 3rd .

there is a big matrix in the manual for symptoms and possible faults .

solenoid off = 7 psi . solenoid on = 10/11 psi . it is on all the time unless something goes wrong .

unfortunately "boost solenoid remains off " come up very often in the chart so it doesnt narrow it down to much .

most likely too much boost . boost on my car became unstable with a fmic and cat back exhaust . could peak to .9 bar .

Thanks for all the suggestions, I am not running any sort of EBC, I added the airfilter after the problem had already started to happen. It is an apexi cone filter, fabricated my own heat shield, and left the airduct on the grill in place.

I will have the timing checked, however I have no idea what the standard timing should be.

Thanks for your help guys.

If anyone else has any ideas let me know.

running the car with no recirculating BOV and stock ecu in most cases is a real pain in the ass because nissan uses a mass air flow meter to calculate load. with no BOV, when you back off your essentially stalling the airflow meter, no airflow across it means no fuel injected, which leads to constant engine stalling. thats just the main issue, there are others associated with it, do a search of SAU and you'll find tonnes of threads about it.

Umm no...

Running no bov means you get reversion through the airflow meter.. air moving through piping gets to closed throttle body, bouncing back through piping and gets chopped up by the air still exiting the turbo, this is the TU-TU-TU sound that VL boys crave so badly.

What happens when this air passes back through the airflow meter is that it gets read again, the afm doesn't know which way the air is moving, just that there is air moving over it. So what happens is, the stock ecu sees more air and throws in more fuel. It is this over fuelling that causes the engine to stall.

Just to add, having the dump valve open to the atmosphere instead of plumbed in will cause your car to use excessive fuel as the ecu is programed to use the air that gets recycled and pumps fuel in. Unless you mean it was blocked off at the intake pipe side so the valve didn't work, then that will cause back spool and early failure of turbo.( topic for discussion, not everyone will agree to this as there was a few cars factory with out them.)

Umm no...

Running no bov means you get reversion through the airflow meter.. air moving through piping gets to closed throttle body, bouncing back through piping and gets chopped up by the air still exiting the turbo, this is the TU-TU-TU sound that VL boys crave so badly.

What happens when this air passes back through the airflow meter is that it gets read again, the afm doesn't know which way the air is moving, just that there is air moving over it. So what happens is, the stock ecu sees more air and throws in more fuel. It is this over fuelling that causes the engine to stall.

i understand what turbo reversion is, i ran may car for 6 months or so with it after my turbo upgrade. however i experienced the complete opposite to running rich and stalling. i could have worded it better than saying it stalled the maf completely, my maf output voltage would become very unstable and lower than normal idle time output voltage (so to me thats as good as a stalled meter) and the wideband O2 readout would lean out causing an engine stall.

thats just my experience and hence why i wrote it. i personally haven't seen an engine run rich during reversion, running an atmo bov i have though. i guess afm placement would have an impact on it and could give a different result, my afm/intake setup is very similar to stock in shape and distance from turbo.

anyway in either case it will cause the same result and i regards to the OP's original question the answer is still yes, it is a bad idea to run without a recirculating BOV.

I had no bov for a couple of days (while piping was being fab'd) and it acted pretty well the same as when running the atmo bov (my tune was well on the rich side anyway and you could see big clouds of black smoke heh).

It's interesting that the maf voltage was all screwy, unfortunately I didn't have my carpc at the time so no idea what maf voltage was doing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
×
×
  • Create New...