Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I know there are lots of variables but was just wondering what other older Nissans/Datsuns show on the tacho at 100kph.

My result is:

Skyline MR30, L24E, 3 speed auto (!), 83 series 1, 3500 RPM

Not so good on economy but hums along nicely on a good day.

cheers,

JH

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/355831-rpm-at-100-kph/
Share on other sites

I know there are lots of variables but was just wondering what other older Nissans/Datsuns show on the tacho at 100kph.

My result is:

Skyline MR30, L24E, 3 speed auto (!), 83 series 1, 3500 RPM

Not so good on economy but hums along nicely on a good day.

cheers,

JH

Hi John,

Your problem is the 3 speed transmission because top gear is 1:1 and not overdrive as in the later model 4 speed.

Have a play with this link and you will see what you have got.

http://www.testarossa.jp/utility/gear.html

Your gear ratios are: 1st: 2.458, 2nd: 1.458, 3rd: 1.000 and at the bottom after 6 is diff ratio: 3.9

Cheers, D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/355831-rpm-at-100-kph/#findComment-5695789
Share on other sites

Thanks Dennis,

Looks like I'm 'spot on' then. Not so bad for a car with 260,000km on the clock.

I'll be interested to see some real-life figures from a 4 sp auto and 5 sp manual. (Maybe you can take the PNV for a run.)

cheers,

JohnH

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/355831-rpm-at-100-kph/#findComment-5695814
Share on other sites

Just by using the Testarossa link and the right gear ratios the 4 speed auto has 0.686 overdrive and does 111kph @ 2500

The 5 speed MR30 with 3.9 diff & 0.833 od it does 92kph @ 2500 and 110kph @ 3000 in top gear.

The PNV however has an od of 0.813 just a tad higher, but with lower diff ratio of 4.11 and it does 89kph @ 2500 and 107kph @ 3000.

As a result of this, my modified L20et (umm 2818 L20et) PNV will have an 3.7:1 diff with a modified R32 GTSt gearbox with an 0.759 overdrive so that it will be a much better cruiser just chugging along on 106kph @ 2500 rpm off boost.

Cheers, D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/355831-rpm-at-100-kph/#findComment-5696022
Share on other sites

The most crytical part of kph @ rpm is your tyre size. Just changing from factory fitted 195/60 x 15 on an R30 to 205/60 x 15 which is the common & norm here in oz, it makes an incredible amount of diferrence to the end result.

D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/355831-rpm-at-100-kph/#findComment-5697151
Share on other sites

speedo doesnt work. have new speedo cable, just have to put it in.

When i sit with traffic on camden bypass at 100km/h, im doing 4000rpm!

so i sit on 3500rpm for economy's sake, and everyone is overtaking me

Took the air filter element out, held engine speed at about 3000rpm, spayed throttle body cleaner

up the air flow meter for about 30 seconds. No difference performance wise, but uses a lot less fuel and a bit smoother

(not that it wasnt smooth before)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/355831-rpm-at-100-kph/#findComment-5697809
Share on other sites

Its JAPANESE but its discernible through context..however i cannot find the ratio specs for the r30 4sp auto gearbox. Who has?

Thanks in advance.

EDIT:

I punched in 0.686 ratio for gear 4 with a diff of 3.9 - gave me 96k/h @ 2000 rpm and 121 k/h @ 2500 rpm - ABOUT RIGHT! guess she pulls her weight alrigght, considering she's done 140k since 1984.

Edited by samkhan86
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/355831-rpm-at-100-kph/#findComment-5699017
Share on other sites

Its JAPANESE but its discernible through context..however i cannot find the ratio specs for the r30 4sp auto gearbox. Who has?

Thanks in advance.

EDIT:

I punched in 0.686 ratio for gear 4 with a diff of 3.9 - gave me 96k/h @ 2000 rpm and 121 k/h @ 2500 rpm - ABOUT RIGHT! guess she pulls her weight alrigght, considering she's done 140k since 1984.

4 speed auto >>> 1st: 2.842, 2nd: 1.542, 3rd: 1.000 & 4th: 0.686. Reverse: 2.400 Diff: 3.9

Cheers, D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/355831-rpm-at-100-kph/#findComment-5699233
Share on other sites

I noticed no one is putting down what there miles per gallon is, since this is where the saving is,

I'm running a L24 inter-cooled Turbo, running EDIS ignition (waste spark), Megasquirt II using the version 3.0 board, running the latest MS Extra firmware,

3 inch mandrel bend exhaust, with a free flowing muffler, and 7 PSI for normal driving, switchable to 10, and 15 PSI

I just came back from a trip, 290ish kilometers, I sat on between 105-115k's 80% of the way,

and I'm getting 34.34 miles per gallon, or 8.22 liters per 100k's.

I'm very happy with this, good fuel economy, and plenty of power, when I put the foot down a little.

to get it running this good, I run it lean (2500 - 3600 RPM), AFR sits between 15 and 16.5 (light cruise), EGT sits about 770ish just before the turbo.

Nigel

Edited by noddle
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/355831-rpm-at-100-kph/#findComment-5701472
Share on other sites

Spec figures from carbuddy.com for L24E:

4sp auto 13.5L/100km city and 8.5L/100km highway.

3sp auto 14L/100km city and 10.5L/100lm highway.

5sp manual 13.5L/100km city and 8.5L/100km highway.

I'd like to try bigger wheels, only running 14's at the moment (195/65HR14). The speedo reading will be out with larger rims/tyres. My guess is that 5% larger outer diameter means 5% lower reading on the speedo - so when it says 95, actual speed is 100.

JH

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/355831-rpm-at-100-kph/#findComment-5702395
Share on other sites

Spec figures from carbuddy.com for L24E:

4sp auto 13.5L/100km city and 8.5L/100km highway.

3sp auto 14L/100km city and 10.5L/100lm highway.

5sp manual 13.5L/100km city and 8.5L/100km highway.

I'd like to try bigger wheels, only running 14's at the moment (195/65HR14). The speedo reading will be out with larger rims/tyres. My guess is that 5% larger outer diameter means 5% lower reading on the speedo - so when it says 95, actual speed is 100.

JH

Ummmm now we are talking tire sizes, well factory fitted 14" tires were 185/70 x 14 & 195/70 x 14 or Ti 195/60 x 15.

185/70 x 14 have a dynamic radius of 299mm

195/70 x 14 have a dynamic radius of 306mm

195/60 x 15 have a dynamic radius of 297mm & optional fit 205/60 x 15 is 303mm

And it's the dynamic radius that counts when it affects the speedo numbers.

And John, your 195/65 x 14 is 295mm

(figures compliments of http://www.toyo.com.au/Tyres.htm)

Cheers, D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/355831-rpm-at-100-kph/#findComment-5702552
Share on other sites

Ummmm now we are talking tire sizes...

Yes, we're wandering off the topic slightly but it's all related. Thanks for the tyre figures. I found this tyre calculator on a VW site: http://www.club80-90...0calculator.htm

I'll check my fuel economy and post some figures as well.

Meanwhile, it might be interesting to see some figures from even-earlier Skylines. The figures from '73 to '83 are all very similar.

cheers,

JH

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/355831-rpm-at-100-kph/#findComment-5702766
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...