Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I can't drive a drag very well at all... and with my brother with a stop watch in the passenger seat I managed to do mid 9 sec 0-100. RB30 manual box, Rb25de 240,000kms. I barely got any wheel spin and I would rev it up a bit to start but the revs would drop down to like idle and then climb lol. I was too nice to it. But its sounds like considering I was a bad driver 9 1/2 sec is pretty good lol.

I am sure it did it faster when it was auto simply because it would start better (since the auto slips kinda). I guess mid 7 or 8+ as an auto. Sure did feel fast off the mark as an auto and that I think is where most time is lost unless I am mistaken.

cheers

Edited by senilykSkylines

Ok, thats it.

Actually bothered to do this.

10 secs, auto NA SR20, simply foot down in drive, in straight auto mode. Filled to the brim of fuel, full weight nothing taken out. 218k kms on the clock.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzDd21y7nek

Edited by Ten Four

Hi guys, what would be the 0-100km/h time for a N/A nissan skyline manual coupe (untouched and unmodified)? I did a search around these forums, google etc couldn't find anything.

EDIT: Model is R34 25GT

Ok, thats it.

Actually bothered to do this.

10 secs, auto NA SR20, simply foot down in drive, in straight auto mode. Filled to the brim of fuel, full weight nothing taken out. 218k kms on the clock.

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=dzDd21y7nek

you didnt really answer his question...

he drives an R34 with a RB25DE in it . im also guessing you were not driving a skyline.

so

differnent car, different motor

HOWEVER, that time would be roughly the same.

you didnt really answer his question...

he drives an R34 with a RB25DE in it . im also guessing you were not driving a skyline.

so

differnent car, different motor

HOWEVER, that time would be roughly the same.

/facepalm

RB25DE Neo 200hp at fly yes? Manual = faster too with launch.

SR20DE non VVT AUTO 135hp @ fly..

Someone seriously can't drive. They SHOULD easily get high 7s (good driver) to mid low 8s (average performance car driver)

Edited by Ten Four

Cause there are people in here with R34s saying 10+secs for a R34 to 100.

If ^ car can do 10secs, then there are lots of shit drivers.

Quick youtube search. 8 secs, no launch.

Now close topic as question has been answered.

Edited by Ten Four

HOWEVER, that time would be roughly the same.

/facepalm

RB25DE Neo 200hp at fly yes? Manual = faster too with launch.

SR20DE non VVT AUTO 135hp @ fly..

Someone seriously can't drive. They SHOULD easily get high 7s (good driver) to mid low 8s (average performance car driver)

i originally said this becausethe SR20 (depending on the car - List of Cars With The SR20) you are capable of running low 8's

Edited by ML73ZR

Cause there are people in here with R34s saying 10+secs for a R34 to 100.

If ^ car can do 10secs, then there are lots of shit drivers.

Man the best I ever got from my auto turbo was ~7 seconds, I must be a really shit driver...

:(

<hangs face down in shame>

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...