Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if the ECU is reset on CAR A,

will there be any engine performanc or fuel performnce difference compared to

a sedate driver ( Car B)

and

an aggresive driver( Car C);

when all 3 cars are then driven in an identical way.

Diferent forums comment about the ECU learning but others indicate the ECU is fixed at the factory and doesnt learn.I did ask somethinmg similar ,prior, but just need further clarification.

New ECU's (current type cars) can learn, e.g if you are an agrasive driver holds the revs longer.

I have felt this in a 03 car were i was agresive in driving and my dad wasnt and i did notice a diffrence in how it drove when we swaped cars. But i think the performance /fuel diffrence is small and realy comes down to how u drive.

The ecu trims fuel dependant on the o2 sensor's feedback voltage while cruising. Different ecu's learn or adjust different cells on the map.

Our M35 Stagea ecu's learn to a much higher load point than the older RB ones apparently. Too bloody smart, especially as it controls the throttle as well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...