Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

just wanted to know what is teh difference on the turbos for GTR33??

I was looking at this one below from ebay; http://cgi.ebay.com.au/R33-GTR-Turbos-N1-Steel-Turbine-RB26-R32-R34-changeover-/120487485104?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item1c0d9d1eb0

R33 GTR Turbos N1 Steel Turbine RB26 R32 R34

and comparing to the -5 or -7

my aim is to get about 300kW on standard engine, power FC, adj cams and bleed valve....atm it is doing 265kW

help me guys, im confused....reason i want to go with the "R33 GTR Turbos N1 Steel Turbine RB26 R32 R34" is because they are cheap.....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358279-turbo-difference/
Share on other sites

Mind you to get a set of -9 with actuators you would be looking at $2700 being more than double the $1250.

Sure they might be a bit laggier than stock but I would think they could put down around 280-300rwkw without too much hassle.

I dunno I am curious too hear about these. I have a set of -9's waiting to go in but I was seriously considering these initially.

When could you expect 1 bar boost with these? around 4500-5000 rpm?

Basically -5 response (4500rpm before anything really happens)

With -7 power

Pretty poor IMO when the -7s are on almost 1000rpm sooner

1000rpm less response with 60-80rwkw less… The extra 1500 is worth it. Best value for money modification.

It’s also power delivery in/out of gears as well. Not what it makes on a loaded up dyno run.

Hey Ash, you always seem to know the g-o with forced air induction. I'm currently getting my 31 worked on at Chasers. It's a stock RB30ET using stock intake manifold, getting a new GT-3586, 45mm ext. wastegate, 3" exhaust, running a gtr cooler (not sure exact dimensions but big). I know i'm going to be making good power but what sort of spool time / response / lag do you think I will be looking at?

Cheers,

James

have a look at calaisturbo.com dude, that's pretty much the standard combo over there ;)

been 8years since I've really looked at 30et results.

stock exhaust manifold and cams will be your issues though with that turbo/motor combo. you need a bit of cam to get the ole SOHC working with a 35

Ook, cool, cheers. I didn't pick the turbo as I have no idea.....also getting ecu and fuel upgrades atm......plans to DET in future with 30 bottom end.

Not even sure of the turbo I blew up (bent shaft), people told me it looked like a factory 33gtr. Used to be spooled up @ 2000rpm in 2nd, 2800 in 4th, and pulled quite hard at 14lbs to redline, where possible, within limits of course. So quite punchy, and nice to drive. I'm worried it's gonna lag like a pig atm, but Chasers think that it'll be fine once tuned.

Thanks for your input.

Power vs lag = it'll be laggy with that turbo. No two ways around it regardless of what people tell you.

You can't bolt on a 700hp turbo and expect response :)

If you had some head work, cam, exhaust manifold and a 3.5-4" exhaust you'd make 350-370rwkw and this would obviously offset the lag in that respect. However my stab in the dark will be 300rwkw depending on how much boost can be wound in. Which is what a 3076 would have done :)

See how it goes either way.

Sweet, will do. If all goes to plan, you should see it next Sunday, providing its all together by then. The Haltech Sports 2000 is in and wired up, just stuffing around with cooler, exhaust & dump pipe, then tune. Worried that clutch won't hold up for dyno tune, if so my car wont be there.

Hey mate, did you used to hang around reservoir in the last couple of years. I have seen another orange 33 looks identical from what I remember. Haven't seen the car in over 18months. Not sure what the plates were, but basically, used to 'CR33M' every time I seen it. Coincidence? (havent seen any other orange 33's)

Sweet, will do. If all goes to plan, you should see it next Sunday, providing its all together by then. The Haltech Sports 2000 is in and wired up, just stuffing around with cooler, exhaust & dump pipe, then tune. Worried that clutch won't hold up for dyno tune, if so my car wont be there.

Hey mate, did you used to hang around reservoir in the last couple of years. I have seen another orange 33 looks identical from what I remember. Haven't seen the car in over 18months. Not sure what the plates were, but basically, used to 'CR33M' every time I seen it. Coincidence? (havent seen any other orange 33's)

Wasn't me mate. There is some guy up there that has a similar looking car to me. But think he has a top secret kit, no carbon lip spoiler and had a orange bonnet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just wire a multimeter in, sit it up like it's a gauge, go for a drive, read temp gauge, read multimeter, speak to phone and tell it to take notes.
    • This is the other log file, if only we had exhaust manifold pressure - would understand what's going on a bit better   Can you take a screenshot of your wastegate setup in the Kebabtech?   Engine Functions --> Boost Control (looks like this):  
    • You just need a datalogger of some sort. A handheld oscilloscope could do it, because it will make the trace visible on screen, so you can look at the peak, or whatever you need to look at. And there are cheap USB voltage loggers available too. You could get a 2 channel one and press a button to feed voltage to the second channel at points that you want to check the sensor voltage, when you knew what the guage was saying, for example.
    • it's not the issue with making power, it's the issue with controlling boost, and this isn't the first time I've seen a 6Boost having issue with controlling boost down low.   The boost control here looks interesting.   Looking at your logs, looks like it's set to open loop boost control strategy (which is fine). We can see VCT being kept on till about 6600RPM (no issue with that). Ignition timing (I'm assuming this is E85, seems within reason too, nothing too low, causing hot EGTS and boost spiking). There's about 15 degrees of advance when your boost shoots up, however can't be this as the timing isn't single digits. I'm assuming there's no EMAP data, as I wasn't able to find it in the logs. We can see your tuner sets the WG DC to 0% after 4300RPM, trying to control boost.   My thoughts, what frequency is your wastegate set to?  AND why aren't you using both ports for better control?
    • While that sounds reasonable, this is definitely a boost control problem, but the real question is why are you having the boost control problem? Which is why I pondered the idea that there's a problem at ~4000rpm related to head flow. In that instance, you are not yet under boost control - it's still ramping up and the wastegate is yet to gain authority. So, I'm thinking that if the wastegate is not yet open enough to execute control, but the compressor has somehow managed ot make a lot of flow, and the intake side of the head doesn't flow as well as the exhaust side (more on that later), then presto, high MAP (read that as boost overshoot). I have a number of further thoughts. I use butterfly valves in industrial applications ALL THE TIME. They have a very non-linear flow curve. That is to say that there is a linear-ish region in the middle of their opening range, where a 1% change in opening will cause a reasonably similar change in flow rate, from one place to another. So, maybe between 30% open and 60% open, that 1% change in opening gives you a similar 2% change in flow. (That 2% is pulled out of my bum, and is 2% of the maximum flow capacity of the valve, not 2% of the flow that happens to be going through the valve at that moment). That means that at 30% open, a 1% change in opening will give you a larger relative flow increase (relative to the flow going through the valve right then) compared to the same increment in opening giving you the same increment in flow in outright flow units. But at 60% opening, that extra 2% of max flow is relatively less than 1/2 the increase at 30% opening. Does that make sense? It doesn't matter if it doesn't because it's not the main point anyway. Below and above the linear-ish range in the middle, the opening-flow curve becomes quite...curved. Here's a typical butterfy valve flow curve. Note that there is a very low slope at the bottom end, quite steep linear-ish slope in the middle, then it rolls off to a low slope at the top. This curve shows the "gain" that you get from a butterfly valve as a function of opening%. Note the massive spike in the curve at 30%. That's the point I was making above that could be hard to understand. So here's the point I'm trying to make. I don't know if a butterfly valve is actually a good candiate for a wastegate. A poppet valve of some sort has a very linear flow curve as a function of opening %. It can't be anyelse but linear. It moves linearly and the flow area increases linearly with opening %. I can't find a useful enough CV curve for a poppet valve that you could compare against the one I showed for the butterfly, but you can pretty much imagine that it will not have that lazy, slow increase in flow as it comes off the seat. It will start flowing straight away and increase flow very noticeably with every increase in opening%. So, in your application, you're coming up onto boost, the wastegate is closed. Boost ramps up quite quickly, because that's really what we want, and all of a sudden it is approaching target boost and the thing needs to open. So it starts opening, and ... bugger all flow. And it opens some more, and bugger all more flow. And all the while time is passing, boost is overshooting further, and then finally the WG opens to the point where the curve starts to slope upwards and it gains authority amd the overshoot is brought under control and goes away, but now the bloody thing is too open and it has to go back the other way and that's hy you get that bathtub curve in your boost plot. My position here is that the straight gate is perhaps not teh good idea it looks like. It might work fine in some cases, and it might struggle in others. Now, back to the head flow. I worry that the pissy little NA Neo inlet ports, coupled with the not-very-aggressive Neo turbo cam, mean that the inlet side is simply not matched to the slightly ported exhaust side coupled with somewhat longer duration cam. And that is not even beginning to address the possibility that the overlap/relative timing of those two mismatched cams might make that all the worse at around 4000rpm, and not be quite so bad at high rpm. I would be dropping in at least a 260 cam in the inlet, if not larger, see what happens. I'd also be thinking very hard about pulling the straight gate off, banging a normal gate on there and letting it vent to the wild, just as an experiment.
×
×
  • Create New...