Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wow amazing! About bloody time some one updated the "spark plug". Was actually discussing this with my mate a few months back talking about how there really havn't been any proper advancements in spark plugs for decades other than using precious metals as electrodes.

i would be concerned about the battery's ability to handle the laser ignition...

Batteries provide a huge amount of capacitance, so I cant see any obvious problem. What am i missing?

Pfft - diesels have been running without spark plugs for a century. Nothing new here.

how the hell does that compare? diesels have a compression ratio of something like 20:1 to ignite the fuel. try using that kind of compression in a petrol engine.

Batteries provide a huge amount of capacitance, so I cant see any obvious problem. What am i missing?

i have no idea about batteries, that's my problem, i'm looking forward to see what can be done about these laser ignition systems, and would they be relevant to our aging RB engines?

i have no idea about batteries, that's my problem, i'm looking forward to see what can be done about these laser ignition systems, and would they be relevant to our aging RB engines?

That's exactly what I was wondering. Surely the roll-out of this technology would require serious modification to existing vehicles? Ecu, coilpacks, for a start would probably need a change.

i would reckon its not just supplying a current, but also the timing and such, not sure how electrical signals work, but maybe, there can be a "translator" sort of thing that changes the signal for the sparkplugs to something relevant to the lasers?

i would reckon its not just supplying a current, but also the timing and such, not sure how electrical signals work, but maybe, there can be a "translator" sort of thing that changes the signal for the sparkplugs to something relevant to the lasers?

Hmmmm sounds cheap lol. It'd need a retune to take full effect of the new technology though.

Lol I guess if they lasted a lifetime though they may pay for themselves (it'll be a while before the new technology becomes that reliable)

i wonder how they'd get around the carbon build up on the lazer lens. unless it closed somehow.

Maybe like a spark plug does now - the laser could burn off any carbon.

Next step to upgrade the tech on an RB would be direct injection since that's a mature technology already. The laser stuff is a while away if it ever gets into production.

I reckon internal combustion has got a fair bit of life left in it. Either ethanol or gas (Australia has shedloads of gas. There's just been a $90 billion 20 year deal signed with China).

In regards to the battery issue...BMW and M-Benz have been pushing for 48Volt sytems for a few years now.

They say they have gone as far as they can using 12 volt

these cars have elec brakes/steering/throttle/suspention & 11ty diffent computers etc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...