Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just picked my self up a 93 GTS-t and just want to ask a couple of questions about the petrol tank.

Firstly the needle seems to be up and down sometimes so Im not sure how accurate it is so I'm wondering how many km on average I should get on a full tank?

Second when I start it up you can hear a sucking sound from the petrol tank and see fumes coming from the filling tube and im just wondering if thats normal?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/36223-question-about-a-gts-t/
Share on other sites

I bought my R33 GTS-t bout 4 months ago so I am a relative noob at this too.

Well I have never heard a sucking sound, and never thought to look back at the tank when i sart it up, but I do get approx 330k's out of top half of tank, and approx 200 out of bottom half, so all up I can squeeze 500k's out of one tank, _IF_ I drive around really gently and like a grandma, but usually get between 350-450 k's.

My problem is I get bad fumes in my cabin, but there is another thread on that and I am investiagting it further atm.

Sounds to me like your petrol cap needs replacing. i have a 93 or 4 (cant remember rightly) gtst and when i start i get no sucking noise or fumes.

I can only assume that the sucking noise is the car drawing air in through an air gap in the cap, maybe the same place the fumes are coming from.

when you go to fill it up do you get the "pop fissss" noise when u break the caps seal?

Depending on how hard you listen,

If its a small 'bubbling/guzzling' sound then its normal, but if you can hear something like air sucking then its not.

Also, the guage problem is very common on GTSt's, ive seen it on a few now including mine, its not that bad just somtimes you look at it and its on half full, you look back 10min later and its on 1/4.

i can get to the coast and back on a 1/4 of a tank :)

Depending on how i drive ofcourse

I get the same movement in my 32 - I think its a sign that the fuel sender is wearing out. I find it never reads LESS than whats in the tank, so if the gauge says EMPTY, then its empty - the warning light comes on anyway.

I'm getting around 400k around town and 550 - 600 highway.

Never had the vapour problem you describe, but then I never looked for it.

I have a 93 R33 GTST too - tho I only get about 330 - 340 kms at a PINCH from a tank - I ALWAYS try and put BP Ultimate in it and stay right away from 'crappymax' (Optimax)

Yeah I give it a little bit of a bootfull every now and then but mostly I don't drive it that hard------

Oh - and I only fit in about 45litres??

400 around town?? I WISH...

Have never heard any of the strange sounds you mention....

Warning light (fuel) ??? WTF?????? Do R33s have them???

I fill up when the fuel light comes on, Usually takes 58 to 60 litres, I prefer ultimate to optimax, however i have found i get more k's from opti, work that out! The sucking noise sounds suspicious, you should be able to get a fuel cap from a parts place like bursons, repco, autobarn etc. Good luck :D

Yea i just looked it up on motor trader, says 65L... maybe the smaller australian filler restrictor stops us filling it right up??

Definitely one of life's mysteries - I thought I had read somewhere (on the net) that the tankwas about 60-65L.

There IS no way mine takes ANYWAY near that - even when fuel indicator on bone dry E.

i think mine is stuffed, its a 93 GTSt, it sits on the full mark until i've done about 200km, then it will start going down. ill hit empty at about 350km, but when i fill up it won't take more than 50L. i've seen the fuel light come on once ever, and that was only when the gauge went below empty and i felt like i was running on fumes.

I bought my R33 GTS-t bout 4 months ago so I am a relative noob at this too.

 

Well I have never heard a sucking sound, and never thought to look back at the tank when i sart it up, but I do get approx 330k's out of top half of tank, and approx 200 out of bottom half, so all up I can squeeze 500k's out of one tank, _IF_ I drive around really gently and like a grandma, but usually get between 350-450 k's.

 

My problem is I get bad fumes in my cabin, but there is another thread on that and I am investiagting it further atm.

Hey Ska, I get bad fumes in my cabin also, can you pm me the thread about this or if you find out what causes it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...