Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Modern medicine is alright...it has definitely extended our average life span. But at the same time, so much of the need for modern medicine is caused by our modern lifestyles themselves. When you simplify the lifestyle, you simplify everything that goes with it. At least you would get to work outdoors lol. Modern technology hasn't really freed up our lifestyles...supposedly we're more stressed and working more hours than ever. Even if we had more free time, we'd just fill it up with shit to do.

Yeah there are animals, off the top of my head all I can think of are tortoises and whales, but on the whole...most in the animal kingdom don't live anywhere as long as we do.

Well one could make the point that our supreme physical and mental attributes are our adaptation to our environment, being Earth. I mean, other cunning animals such as lions use their cerebral thinking to catch prey and sit atop the food chain...hence they are the kings of the jungle.

but lions dont live anywhere near jungles.

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes there are many animals that dont live as long as we do. But maybe thats what we should be doing? I mean go back to egypt they only live till they were 30-40 on a good week. And Birds how did we adapt? Look around us everything has been changed to suit our needs and desires that is not adapting.

adapting present participle of a·dapt (Verb)

1. Make (something) suitable for a new use or purpose; modify. We never changed, we changed the enviroment.

2. Become adjusted to new conditions.

In which way, shape or form have we adapted to Earth or anything on it? We have invented things so that we can live there that isn't adapting to the condition that is create a subenviroment that suits the animal. I mean i can make a fish live in a desert by giving it a fish tank and a cooling system. But thats not the animal really adapting is it?

Edited by beemae30

Yes there are many animals that dont live as long as we do. But maybe thats what we should be doing? I mean go back to egypt they only live till they were 30-40 on a good week. And Birds how did we adapt? Look around us everything has been changed to suit our needs and desires that is not adapting.

adapting present participle of a·dapt (Verb)

1. Make (something) suitable for a new use or purpose; modify. We never changed, we changed the enviroment.

2. Become adjusted to new conditions.

In which way, shape or form have we adapted to Earth or anything on it? We have invented things so that we can live there that isn't adapting to the condition that is create a subenviroment that suits the animal. I mean i can make a fish live in a desert by giving it a fish tank and a cooling system. But thats not the animal really adapting is it?

Well, we did adapt/change to suit our environment...we didn't go inventing things and sub-environments from the start. What about the hunter-gatherer ages? If you keep in mind that our ancestors (depending which religious or scientific beliefs you subscribe to) roamed this earth thousands / millions of years ago...we did physically adapt over time to suit our environment. Not to mention we evolved from single cell organisms, and evolution is intertwined with adaptation. But whether we physically adapt ourselves or foster an environment to suit us, either is still a form of adapting. Animals would do it too if they had the brains. They dig holes in the ground to hibernate, they build nests...is that not changing the environment to suit the creature?

Looking at your definition of adapting though...it seems to have two broad definitions, the latter of which kind of supports what you said. However, the first definition does not specify if it is the creature of the environment being changed to suit the other. Could be either, and really, adaptation takes place regardless of what is being modified. And for that matter, it's not a completely one sided process either...animals adapt to other animals (predators, prey etc.) adapting, which are legitimately a part of the first animal's environment. It's all too intertwined for us to seperate it like you have. All we can say is that if a species has survived, then it has adapted.

/Darwin

In which way, shape or form have we adapted to Earth or anything on it? We have invented things so that we can live there that isn't adapting to the condition that is create a subenviroment that suits the animal.

Do you not have an immune system, or have you forgotten it exists?

Are you and everyone around you albinos, where you don't tan in exposure to UV light?

Has your body never had as a coccyx or an appendix?

We might supplement these natural features with developments from our own intelligence, but to say the human body by itself has never adapted (either in the short term with things such as the immune system or melanin, or in the long term with vestigial features) is obviously false. The fact that we're not extinct is proof enough of that.

Yes in the last 10,000 yrs we have evolved to suit our enviromental infulences. Not adapted we never radically altered ourselves knowingly to suit a situation. Tell me in the last 100 yrs of industrilisation have we adapted to any enviroment? All we do is change the enviroment to help us.

Yes in the last 10,000 yrs we have evolved to suit our enviromental infulences. Not adapted we never radically altered ourselves knowingly to suit a situation.

Now you're just shifting the goalposts. There was no timeline mentioned in your original definition for "adapt". "Adjusting to new conditions" (as per your supplied Definition 2) would include evolution.

At any rate, my immune system example still applies. You start off without an immunity to a disease, and once infected you either die or that system adapts to deal with it.

As does tanning. Europeans have only lived in Australia for approximately 225 years. The ones that came over on the First Fleet will be as pasty-white as the Poms that still live in the UK today, compared to Anglo Saxons that have lived here all their lives. Their body rapidly (compared to evolution) adjusted its skin tone to suit the local environment.

Of course if you go and then redefine "rapid" down to talking about minutes (rather than your century timeline) then I guess I'd be wrong again. :rolleyes:

Yes in the last 10,000 yrs we have evolved to suit our enviromental infulences. Not adapted we never radically altered ourselves knowingly to suit a situation. Tell me in the last 100 yrs of industrilisation have we adapted to any enviroment? All we do is change the enviroment to help us.

We do both...as I said it's not a one sided thing.

What creature do you know of that has evolved radically over 100 years? Adaptation and evolution is a very slow process, and about the quickest non-bacterial species to do it are humans, with or without our brains. Case in point, someone from 200-300 years ago would probably die from exposure to a modern day influenza virus...for us it's a week or two off work.

I recall something about white settlers spreading disease to indigenous peeps and many dying from it.

Humans sure have evolved.

As mentioned, look at the immune system, how the immune have evolved to remember the invaders, and produce antibodies to handle those said invaders the next time they attack.

Then the teeth structure of people, molars, incisors, canines indicated that people are herbivores, and we have adapted and evolved to actually be able to handle plant foods and meat as well. The length of intestines are too short relative to body length for a purely plant based diet, and too long for a purely carnivorous diet. Another fact that we actually have adapted to surroundings and food..

Yeah, thread was way too serious.

My take: Global warming is real, its been happening for millenia. We may have helped it to happen this time, but it was likely going to happen anyway just not quite as quickly maybe.

What can we do about it:

1. Panic and form Climate Change committees

2. Allow ppl like Al Gore to find a new career and make heaps of $$$$ which does nothing for any of us.

3. All go back to horses and Amish style living.

4. Have a war or stop all wars [i'm not sure which here].

5. Stop all car racing and any other unnecessary burning of fossil fuels.

6. Make all our armies, navies, and airforce stop doing pointless stuff.

7. Ban Macca's [we all know that GW started with themanyway].

8. Use renewable energy.

9. Make new taxes like Carbon ones

10. bans on all sorts of polluting things like cows farting etc

But it won't help, cos global warming/climate change is a natural thing that occurs irrespective of what anyone does.

BTW I'm an agnostic

Given the widely noted increase in the warming effects of rising greenhouse gas concentrations, it has been unclear why global surface temperatures did not rise between 1998 and 2008

http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/pnas-201102467.pdf

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok guys thank you very much. GCG highflow it is then 🙂 
    • forgot to mention that when it does this it does not kill the engine, but I have not kept the pedal down long enough to let it, as I see no reason to beat up on it as its got to be something simple, small and dumb causing this.  And as soon as I let off pedal, the engine returns to its normal super smooth operation and rpms re-stabilize quickly, once below 4k. 
    • neither stumble or cut really seem to be an appropriate term....hard to explain its like a rev limiter but at 4k, but it violently shakes engine and entire vehicle as the rpms will not rise over 4k, even with slow acceleration. as soon as it hits 4k, it sounds like entire spark is lost entirely. plugs were 1.1 which I used as such, but later put in new plugs gapped down to .8 changed back after issue arose when I replaced the coils, still does it with either plug gap...damn and it was all running so good.
    • Oh how times have changed! I actually lean it out relative to my water/methanol injector duty cycle. The methanol adds a lot of fueling and you can then lean it out even more due to reduced knock. 
    • Yeah my thoughts are the same, a well thought out WMI setup, would be slightly ahead of just straight E85 and you're also chemically intercooling the charged air, dropping it even further. This is why you need to add so much more fuel as soon as you spray. I remember someone taking me through their set up before (Dennis, has a R33, lives around Cabramatta - no idea if he's still around on this forum). He would target AFR 10:1 on 98, then as WMI ramped on, AFR would lean back up to 11:1. Amazingly, he did this all through his PowerFC, a relay to cut power to his EBC solenoid if there was not enough line pressure on his WMI kit. And of course, if there wasn't any boost made above gate pressure, you wouldn't be accessing the load cells with heaps of timing for WMI. One downside to that rudimentary setup, once the WMI came on, the EBC would unleash the dragon, and of course all the timing. Tyres would fry lol.
×
×
  • Create New...