Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Am I reading it wrong, at a glance its richer than 12:1 from 4000rpm - what would you expect to run AFR wise at 15psi?

Talking about the dip, it gets better afterwards, you can drive through it, but dips as it starts to make power.

Id drop the exhaust before the cat and do another run.

But to be honest the 3076 doesnt really wake up until 18+ psi

and the response looks pretty good to me.

So check for obvious retrictions in the exhaust, and drop it for the next dyno run, Im not sure its that as the power doesnt drop off up top.

next would be throw more boost at the thing and see if the power goes up.

Only other thing I feel worth mentioning is, that the .63 will be choking the 76mm comp wheel, so you will never get the most from the turbo.

Is it internal gate or external gate?

Internal gate, 18psi actuator, aftermarket 3' inch dump, aftermarket 3' cat and back exhaust, but standard manifold using spacer, tuned @ 15psi because of standard head gasket...?

Internal gate, 18psi actuator, aftermarket 3' inch dump, aftermarket 3' cat and back exhaust, but standard manifold using spacer, tuned @ 15psi because of standard head gasket...?

Push 20psi and tune it harder.

Can I get a +1?

Internal gate, 18psi actuator, aftermarket 3' inch dump, aftermarket 3' cat and back exhaust, but standard manifold using spacer, tuned @ 15psi because of standard head gasket...?

My standard head gasket has had nearly 100,000km of >15psi (its hit 30psi after I did something silly once) and its intact, they can't be THAT bad.

Power curve looks about right. Could be that the dyno is reading lower than others. Are you running the stock intake pipe from the pod filter to the turbo?

Is there a reason your only running at that boost level? Seems abit low

Internal gate, 18psi actuator, aftermarket 3' inch dump, aftermarket 3' cat and back exhaust, but standard manifold using spacer, tuned @ 15psi because of standard head gasket...?

Power curve looks about right. Could be that the dyno is reading lower than others. Are you running the stock intake pipe from the pod filter to the turbo?

Is there a reason your only running at that boost level? Seems abit low

80mm metal intake pipe, tuner believes stock head gasket won't hold higher boost than 15psi, the car has got 115000kms on the clock and hasn't run any more than 1bar of boost it's whole life...?

80mm metal intake pipe, tuner believes stock head gasket won't hold higher boost than 15psi, the car has got 115000kms on the clock and hasn't run any more than 1bar of boost it's whole life...?

With a good tune it should, my GT3076R first went on my car at around the 100,000km mark (I can't remember exactly when) and the motor has not been opened since I got it at 60,000km, presumeably not before then either. It is now at around 197,000km and I first had it tuned to 15psi... and has since been tuned on 17psi (probably done 40,000km or so at that level).

I've mentioned the actuator should be upgraded earlier in this thread, I had similar spool to this with the one supplied.

Is it a real 3076??? sounds more like one of those choke-aholic hybrids?

I'm a bit suss on the turbine housing, it could be a dodgy hybrid, the rest of it is the real deal. I noticed from looking at the back (exhaust side) of many GT3076 turbo's that there are two different types (apart from size) of internal style housings the open type (like stock turbo, this what mine looks like) and partition type, between turbine wheel and internal wastegate. Could that be the answer, choke-aholic hybrid turbine housing..?

The boost curve on that looks much like when I had the soft actuator, get a big can actuator and that'll really liven things up - the one supplied seems to open at about 11-12psi no matter what you do and makes it feel quite lazy.

In regards to the power made, mine still made pretty decent power on 15psi - GT3076Rs work fairly well at 1bar still, they just come into their own versus small turbos at higher boost... more due to the smaller turbos maxing out than the GT3076R NEEDING lots of boost.

Maybe that dyno is particularly harsh? Does it feel fairly quick on the road once boost is built up or is it definitely feeling like the 230kw number suggests?

It feels like 230kw, but i was hoping for more like what your car is putting out... It has a new 18psi actuator, which was specifically ordered for this turbo... Aftermarket 3' inch dump, single pipe not split system, aftermarket 3' cat and back exhaust, but standard manifold using spacer, 80mm metal intake pipe, tuner believes stock head gasket won't hold higher boost than 15psi, the car has got 115000kms on the clock and hasn't run any more than 1bar of boost it's whole life...

As I mentioned to trident150v - I'm a bit suss on the turbine housing, it could be a dodgy hybrid, the rest of it is the real deal. I noticed from looking at the back (exhaust side) of many GT3076 turbo's that there are two different types (apart from size) of internal style housings the open type (like stock turbo, this what mine looks like) and partition type, between turbine wheel and internal wastegate. Could that be the answer, choke-aholic hybrid turbine housing..?

And leaning out at 4-45000rpm, do you get any knock?

na he wouldnt, andy (hyperdrive owner/tuner) is real conservative on timing, especially around peak torque. on cars with mods like this one he always tunes down to 11.5:1 at peak torque then back up to 12:1 after that

OP: i have a proper garrett internal gate housing and dump pipe to suit for this turbo if your interested?

Edited by JonnoHR31

na he wouldnt, andy (hyperdrive owner/tuner) is real conservative on timing, especially around peak torque. on cars with mods like this one he always tunes down to 11.5:1 at peak torque then back up to 12:1 after that

OP: i have a proper garrett internal gate housing and dump pipe to suit for this turbo if your interested?

Yeah, i would be interested, send more info on what you've got..

yea that's true guy's,

when my stock turbo died i was looking for turbo replacement and thought just to replace injectors, turbo and AFM and tune, that was like 1 1/2 year ago.

anyway i wanted my car on the road asp i did bit research on turbo and they were all positive comments so i bought turbo ,

then went to cypher to do all the mods zack told me to buy 6boost manifold and that i would benifit from set of cams, he advised me go external gate ,

i did of bit search and it would of cost me $800 to replace exaust housing on turbo then 6 boost and manifold $2000 so i was like nah i don't want to spend any more money and that is where i made biggest mistake i already paid for tune over 1000 for 3 retune's ,

so i bought 6 boost low mount manifold which i have issues with heat my engine bay gets way to hot i thought to take it off and do Ceramic coating and wrap it with heat tape.

Also thanks to Andrew at Hyperdrive did a great Job on my last tune previously tuned twice by cypher was very disappointed.

Andrew said it was pinging like 150 sometimes luckily i come to him before i blew my engine, he also said that timing was bit off and that he corrected the fuel issue as well, he got it sorted low pings nothing over 25-30.

christo76 i hope you sort out you problem and enjoy your car as much as you can.

I need to sort out my problem as well but was thinking of selling it as i just got new job and require something more economical.

The tune definetely seems on the safe side. AFR's are quite rich, running quite low boost and we also don't know what the timing map looks like. Could be running bugger all timing aswell.

Sure there could be a slight problem with the setup but it also could just be a very safe tune.

Also don't touch the headgasket, there is no need.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...