Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Over the last few months while saving I have narrowed my choice of an intercooler down to the HKS Type S kit or the HKS Type R kit for my R33 GTSt. My current power target is to get around 200 rwkw but could possibly be aiming at achieving 230-240 rwkw in the future with the help of a HKS 2540 or more than likely a similarly sized Garret turbo, Power FC, Injectors, fuel pump etc, etc, but these upgrades are just a possibility. Anyway here are my questions.

If I purchased the Type R kit and never went ahead with upgrading to a larger turbo etc, would the thicker core of the Type R have an adverse affect on engine response over the Type S core at this power level (around 200 rwkw’s)?

What are any other advantages with the Type R core over the Type S apart from the thicker core size (greater ability to cool air)? Lower pressure drop over the core? I am a big believer in matching the right size intercooler for the right power level and that bigger is not always better, in my case would the Type R be overkill for my needs, remembering that I may at some stage be aiming to get 230-240 rwkw’s?

Not having seen both kits before, are the intercooler piping designs identical (air exists out of core at passenger side, enters engine bay, goes over radiator and then in throttle body)? Are the pipes of the same diameter (another question related to engine response)?

Finally, aluminium or mild steel piping in regards to rust. Im not particularly worried about the difference of the two piping materials on absorbing heat from the engine bay, I think the difference between the two would be minimal. But am concerned if there are any problems with the mild steel rusting etc, probably not too much of an issue but I though id ask anyway.

Hmmm, that’s about it! Any help or input on the topic would be much appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/36533-hks-intercooler-kits/
Share on other sites

here are pics to my hks type S intercooler install, firstly the piping goes nowhere near the engine bay as they plug back into the original turbo and inlet manifold pipes (well atleast is for the R34)

http://www.pbase.com/franks/07dec02_fmic_install

i have 199.5rwkw with the following modifications on c&v's dyno in sydney

-0.8bar boost on stock turbo using apexi avcr

-powerfc tuned by c&v

-hks typeS front mount intercooler

-stock air box with high flow panel

-trust dd cat back exhaust with hiflow cat

-hks front and dump pipes

so your target power is pretty spot on with your planned modifications and similarly with mine as i plan on running about 1.1bar through a 2530 turbo and im hoping for around 230rwkw...

a thicker i/c core helps reduce pressure drop across the core so your throttle response should be better id imagine.

when evaluating the performance of intercooler systems you can really only evaluate thermal and pressure efficiencies. ie. how well the i/c system reduces the compressed air temps from your turbo back down to ambient temperatures and how much pressure it loses to cool that air down.

afaik, the taller the core the greater thermal efficiency it has, the thicker the core the better pressure efficiency it has. so, if the difference between the typeS and R is solely thickness, then overall, the R would be better due to its better pressure efficiency. as for it matching the power levels your after im sure both would do equally aswell as each other.

i didnt think any interooler piping comes in mild steel?

In reguards to rust, i have had the steel pipes from the type-s kit installed on my car for the past 4-5 months now and there isnt a spec of rust anywhere inside or out. The pipes are coated or painted with something aswell so its not just bare metal, seems pretty good to me

Thanks Frank’s very helpful response and nice pictures! I am pretty sure I have seen the Type S kit for the R33 and from what I can remember the return goes through the bay not next to the cooler. I guess the R34 design is different, I could be wrong though.

I guess I was worried about the larger volume of the core rather than a difference in pressure drop that may cause an issue with response. As I would assume the difference in any pressure drop between the two cores would be minimal (could be wrong here as well).

Thanks Meshmesh I will have a look at those. I couldn’t really find was I was looking for with some searches I tried before, maybe these will give me a clearer idea.

Ah yeah, not mild steel, just steel piping… oops…

here are pics to my hks type S intercooler install, firstly the piping goes nowhere near the engine bay as they plug back into the original turbo and inlet manifold pipes (well atleast is for the R34)

http://www.pbase.com/franks/07dec02_fmic_install

i have 199.5rwkw with the following modifications on c&v's dyno in sydney

-0.8bar boost on stock turbo using apexi avcr

-powerfc tuned by c&v

-hks typeS front mount intercooler

-stock air box with high flow panel

-trust dd cat back exhaust with hiflow cat

-hks front and dump pipes

so your target power is pretty spot on with your planned modifications and similarly with mine as i plan on running about 1.1bar through a 2530 turbo and im hoping for around 230rwkw...

a thicker i/c core helps reduce pressure drop across the core so your throttle response should be better id imagine.

when evaluating the performance of intercooler systems you can really only evaluate thermal and pressure efficiencies. ie. how well the i/c system reduces the compressed air temps from your turbo back down to ambient temperatures and how much pressure it loses to cool that air down.  

afaik, the taller the core the greater thermal efficiency it has, the thicker the core the better pressure efficiency it has. so, if the difference between the typeS and R is solely thickness, then overall, the R would be better due to its better pressure efficiency. as for it matching the power levels your after im sure both would do equally aswell as each other.

i didnt think any interooler piping comes in mild steel?

What kind of front bar is that Franks?

Did you have to cut much away from it?

Thanks meshmesh, saves me posting it again. To answer Nismo_AU's question, for 240 rwkw you should aim for around 20 litres of intercooler and pipework. That is if you want to maintain standard type response. That means;

**600 X 300 X 65 tube and fin intercooler

**63 mm pipework from turbo to intercooler

**75 mm pipework from intercooler to throttle body

Note that, in order to achieve 20 litres with these dimensions, you have to use the 120 degree bend at the throttle body style of pipework.

We only use aluminium pipework, weighs heaps less than mild or stainless steel and is cheaper. Aluminium heats up faster but it cools down quicker, so I don't think there is any real difference there.

Hope that helps

abobob, that is a Top Secret copy (not a very good one). Supplied and fitted by Carmate about a year and abit ago. drive-in and drive-out $800.

cutting? hahah only a slight bit on both sides of the core where the pipes exit the core....and i stuffed it up too :P im not the best with an air saw - but im getting better :D:) :)

goodluck nismo_au

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...