Jump to content
SAU Community

6765 Precision Turbos? On Rb30

cribba

By cribba,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

cribba Rookie

cribba

Posted
Posted (edited)

hi im just upgrading my gt35r on my rb26/30. im looking into the 6765 precision turbo, i like the specs of the turbo and its great the fact i dont have to change to a t4 flange. ive heard a lot of good things about these turbos. has anyone used these on an rb30 and can give some feedback on housings and so forth? im aiming round the 700hp with not having a big lag monster i think will be ideal. any ideas are welcome thanks?

Edited by cribba
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/365779-6765-precision-turbos-on-rb30/
Share on other sites
HYPED6 Collaborator

HYPED6

Posted
Posted

I have seen, in person, not just heard about 35R's being just out of puff at over 400rwkw for extended periods of use.

Now, I love the turbo. I still believe that a 35R is the perfect balance between response and reasonable power output.

What I also believe is that when pushed for extended periods at power levels at above 400rwkw a 66mm compressor turbo is a better choice.

Its not that the 35R cant do it, its that you have to really push the turbo to do it for extended periods.

Now, 400rwkw means= 400rwkw on a dyno dynamics dyno, in the correct shootout mode, in this case 6F with the air temp sensor hanging up on the wall not in the engine bay.

EGT's also under 800C normally 750C just to ensure the longevity of the turbo. The correct fuel used for the application.

I could easily make 450rwkw on the dyno with air temp in the engine bay and in some random ramp rate but thats hardly comparing apples with apples.

HYPED6 Collaborator

HYPED6

Posted
Posted

I havent done back to back on a 6765 but I can tell youi that a 37-88 is a much better setup for over 400rwkw, Has almost (within 300rpm) the same responce as a 35 with .8 rear.

I have even tried a plain bearing 66mm with a .64 T4 rear housing. Tiny litle bit more lag than a 35r with .8 on a 26 but has the scope for 450rwkw.

For under 400rwkw the 35 is a perfect turbo :)

cribba Rookie

cribba

Posted
  • Author
Posted

hey guys there was nothing wrong with the 35r dont get wrong it was a great turbo. but i no if i kept pushing it too what it was going it might do damage. thought i would upgrade to something a little larger and not work it as hard. i was pushin out round the 400kw. good power for that turbo. i am thirsty for a little power and have something reliable. it doesnt get driven on the street much now more a track car. does anyone no the exducer size of the compressor wheel on a 6765? i heard there the same size as a to4z just want to double check?

cribba Rookie

cribba

Posted
  • Author
Posted

hey guys, look theres nothing wrong with the 35r, i was more than happy with it. but i didnt want it to let go pushing it all the time. i was making round 400kw. i would like to get something a little larger and not push it as hard. the car doesnt get driven on the street much anymore, more a track car. does anyone no the exducer size of the compressor wheel on a 6765? i heard they are the same as a t04z just wanted to double check? thanks for help

mico Proficient

mico

Posted
Posted

yeah its good mate still waiting on parts tho :( seriously tho is the gtx too expensive ?? its got another 150hp over the one u have, and will bolt straight on to your existing dump, mani, oil/water lines intake etc etc. by the time u modify everythin to fit the precision u will probably have spent the same.

black bnr32 Community Regular

black bnr32

Posted
Posted (edited)

6765 on a 3L us-spec S50 BMW

http://forums.bimmer...34&d=1306267312

http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1658765

or

http://store.forcedp...y_Code=Turbo-FP

Edited by black bnr32
Ryan1200 Proficient

Ryan1200

Posted
Posted

thanks to mico, found the spec on the wheels of the 6765. compessor wheel 65mm inducer 87.5mm exducer. turbine wheel- 74mm inducer 65mm exducer. similiar specs to a to4z. should come on boost similiar to the 35r id say

67mm compressor inducer.

I have a 6765 in the forsale section atm although its a T4 version so not much good in this situation.. From my research this turbo will be a far bit lazier than a 35R it will be comparable to a t04z and make GT4294 power.. If mine doesnt sell shortly ill have some results to post up in the next month or so. Will be able to compare my old twin hks 2530's setup on a built 2.6 to 6765 .81 6boost T4 open manifold.. :yes:

Lithium Grand Master

Lithium

Posted
Posted

The PT6765 is quite a bit laggier than a GT35R, they're more comparable with a T04Z. Even the smaller Precision PT6262 is laggier than a GT35R, though would also be a bit of an upgrade.

The GT3794R seem like an awesome piece of work though is again laggier than GT3582R, would be my pick of the bunch though :)

cribba Rookie

cribba

Posted
  • Author
Posted

67mm compressor inducer.

I have a 6765 in the forsale section atm although its a T4 version so not much good in this situation.. From my research this turbo will be a far bit lazier than a 35R it will be comparable to a t04z and make GT4294 power.. If mine doesnt sell shortly ill have some results to post up in the next month or so. Will be able to compare my old twin hks 2530's setup on a built 2.6 to 6765 .81 6boost T4 open manifold.. :yes:

that sounds great mate, good luck with yours

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • GTSBoy
      DeAgostini 1/8 scale BNR32 Nissan Skyline GT-R Nismo

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      That's hilariously putrid!
    • GTSBoy
      R33 Fuel Pump & Brakes after alarm swap

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...