Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have searched all the threads I could find looking for the meaning of the DTC 1805 (Diagnostic Trouble Code).

Eventually I found an obscure web page that told me what this fault was. 1805 = Brake Pedal position (BPP) switch - circuit malfunction.

So at last a meaning. Further reader said that the car showed this fault when the ECU has not seen the brake pedal signal in a WHILE! Very vague but this were the words I read.

Further reading of the G35 service manual said that the ECU put the car in a Limp mode with the following effects.

At Idle = no change

Under hard acceleration = reduced response

I am not sure I saw much change in acceleration but I did have slightly better economy. So perhaps the response was slower.

Now why did I get this code....

In the quest for the best performing M35 I could drive i have been very open to the idea of trying new things to realize the real power of the motor. Having done most mods to the car to improve breating of the motor, stopping and handling, we had been looking to find a way to improve throttle response off the line. The ECU is very intrusive in this area limiting throttle to 35% below 10kph.

Some smart M35 owners worked out that that the ECU reads the BPP and delays throttle response by approx 2 seconds when released. So the plan was to cut the input wire to the ECU.

The result was very good with 100% of throttle available whilst still on the brake pedal allowing very fast launch.

BUT the ECU once again outfoxed us throwing a CODE and limiting our fun.

SO the solution.... I installed a switch to the wire (as some other have done) and the fault code disappears on the next drive. I was also getting DTC code 0235 (turbo boost sensor circuit) but I think this may be how the ECU was limiting the FUN factor but as I have a Profec B installed I may have been outsmarting the ECU.

So now the Switch really should be labeled FUN as per Leon's suggestion.

Cheers

Andy

post-41854-0-99757400-1307692993_thumb.png

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/367354-m35-dtc-code-1805/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

So it finally threw a code. Looks like a switch is the answer.

Did it cut the throttle though? I don't care if the light comes on...

I didn't notice a significant change but the car was running a little more economically.

When it threw the 1805 code it also threw the 0235 code (turbo boost circuit) so I suspect it was trying to limit boost. But as I have the Profec B fitted I think it was unable to limit boost :banana:thus the 0235 code.

So it finally threw a code. Looks like a switch is the answer.

How come Andy's car throws a code & others haven't as yet? Has he just travelled more km's, stopped/started more often or done something else to trigger the ECU into realising it hasn't seen the brake on for a "while"....

I love how our cars behave so differently. M35's are always keeping at least one of us thinking/guessing. There's nothing boring about our rides :)

With the switch situation;

Would it be possible to set up a Momentary type switch, with a delay board (i.e. Jaycar window delay, or similar for example) to break the BPP connection for say; 1 minute, then automatically re-engage, once the delay is finished?

That way when you wish to do a full throttle start; you push a Momentary switch to disengage the BPP circuit, and after a minute; (or 5 minutes, or 10 minutes; whatever) then you don't need to worry about flicking the switch back later.

Not really my area of expertise; but it might stop inadvertent loss of performance just because you forget to flick the toggle switch back.

Ahh, so Scotty's could have been on as well, just masked by other MILs. What about Aaron? No light yet? I haven't gone more than maybe 80kms since I did the mod, but have switched it out/in a few times & hence keeping me error free.

Would it be possible to set up a Momentary type switch, with a delay board (i.e. Jaycar window delay, or similar for example) to break the BPP connection for say; 1 minute, then automatically re-engage, once the delay is finished?

Sure, that wouldn't be very difficult, but I reckon if you were planning on driving hard it would be easier to flick a switch which leaves you ready for action the whole time. Then just turn it off when finished. If you forget (for the next week :)), the worst that will happen is a trouble light on the dash which is fixed by returning the switch to normal & a restart.

Sure, that wouldn't be very difficult, but I reckon if you were planning on driving hard it would be easier to flick a switch which leaves you ready for action the whole time. Then just turn it off when finished. If you forget (for the next week :)), the worst that will happen is a trouble light on the dash which is fixed by returning the switch to normal & a restart.

Ahh ok, I thought you needed to do a MIL reset; if all you have to do is turn the key off it's not a big deal. :thumbsup:

im in the same boat as scott wouldnt know due to the emanage..

maybe im due for a jaycar visit.. lol

same boat.........just bought a momentary switch though as it only needs a 1 connection every couple of hundred with the brake on.

are we sure thats all thats needed? the car being this smart i wouldnt be suprised if it detects a faulty connection thinking it comes on momentarily..

does the engine light dissapear as soon as it notices a connection?(for those without emanage)

There are many M35's getting around with the mod done now, none of the ones down here have the MIL up yet that I know of... Perhaps its just you Canadians? :nyaanyaa:

Im sure they will pop up eventually. I fitted a switch in one today, just next to the ecu. If the light comes on he will just switch it back on for a minute. We need to come up with a simple switch/circuit to automatically enable the brake circuit for a single pulse. Perhaps a momentary switch on the brake or handbrake?

There are many M35's getting around with the mod done now, none of the ones down here have the MIL up yet that I know of... Perhaps its just you Canadians? :nyaanyaa:

Im sure they will pop up eventually. I fitted a switch in one today, just next to the ecu. If the light comes on he will just switch it back on for a minute. We need to come up with a simple switch/circuit to automatically enable the brake circuit for a single pulse. Perhaps a momentary switch on the brake or handbrake?

Maybe connect the momentary switch to the park brake.

You always have you foot on the brake when you release the park brake.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...